RVG behaves like a profile: a single flag enables a set of bits. Right
now we're considering user choice when handling RVG and zicsr/zifencei
and ignoring user choice on MISA bits.
We'll add user warnings for profiles when the user disables its
mandatory extensions in the next patch. We'll do the same thing with RVG
now to keep consistency between RVG and profile handling.
First and foremost, create a new RVG only helper to avoid clogging
riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(). We do not want to annoy users with
RVG warnings like we did in the past (see 9b9741c38f), thus we'll only
warn if RVG was user set and the user disabled a RVG extension in the
command line.
For every RVG MISA bit (IMAFD), zicsr and zifencei, the logic then
becomes:
- if enabled, do nothing;
- if disabled and not user set, enable it;
- if disabled and user set, throw a warning that it's a RVG mandatory
extension.
This same logic will be used for profiles in the next patch.
Note that this is a behavior change, where we would error out if the
user disabled either zicsr or zifencei. As long as users are explicitly
disabling things in the command line we'll let them have a go at it, at
least in this step. We'll error out later in the validation if needed.
Other notable changes from the previous RVG code:
- use riscv_cpu_write_misa_bit() instead of manually updating both
env->misa_ext and env->misa_ext_mask;
- set zicsr and zifencei directly. We're already checking if they
were user set and priv version will never fail for these
extensions, making cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() redundant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-16-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Previous patches added several g_hash_table_insert() patterns. Add two
helpers, one for each user hash, to make the code cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-15-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The profile support is handling multi-letter extensions only. Let's add
support for MISA bits as well.
We'll go through every known MISA bit. If the profile doesn't declare
the bit as mandatory, ignore it. Otherwise, set the bit in env->misa_ext
and env->misa_ext_mask.
Now that we're setting profile MISA bits, one can use the rv64i CPU to boot
Linux using the following options:
-cpu rv64i,rva22u64=true,rv39=true,s=true,zifencei=true
In the near future, when rva22s64 (where, 's', 'zifencei' and sv39 are
mandatory), is implemented, rv64i will be able to boot Linux loading
rva22s64 and no additional flags.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-14-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We have two instances of the setting/clearing a MISA bit from
env->misa_ext and env->misa_ext_mask pattern. And the next patch will
end up adding one more.
Create a helper to avoid code repetition.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-13-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We already track user choice for multi-letter extensions because we
needed to honor user choice when enabling/disabling extensions during
realize(). We refrained from adding the same mechanism for MISA
extensions since we didn't need it.
Profile support requires tne need to check for user choice for MISA
extensions, so let's add the corresponding hash now. It works like the
existing multi-letter hash (multi_ext_user_opts) but tracking MISA bits
options in the cpu_set_misa_ext_cfg() callback.
Note that we can't re-use the same hash from multi-letter extensions
because that hash uses cpu->cfg offsets as keys, while for MISA
extensions we're using MISA bits as keys.
After adding the user hash in cpu_set_misa_ext_cfg(), setting default
values with object_property_set_bool() in add_misa_properties() will end
up marking the user choice hash with them. Set the default value
manually to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-12-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The TCG emulation implements all the extensions described in the
RVA22U64 profile, both mandatory and optional. The mandatory extensions
will be enabled via the profile flag. We'll leave the optional
extensions to be enabled by hand.
Given that this is the first profile we're implementing in TCG we'll
need some ground work first:
- all profiles declared in riscv_profiles[] will be exposed to users.
TCG is the main accelerator we're considering when adding profile
support in QEMU, so for now it's safe to assume that all profiles in
riscv_profiles[] will be relevant to TCG;
- we'll not support user profile settings for vendor CPUs. The flags
will still be exposed but users won't be able to change them;
- profile support, albeit available for all non-vendor CPUs, will be
based on top of the new 'rv64i' CPU. Setting a profile to 'true' means
enable all mandatory extensions of this profile, setting it to 'false'
will disable all mandatory profile extensions of the CPU, which will
obliterate preset defaults. This is not a problem for a bare CPU like
rv64i but it can allow for silly scenarios when using other CPUs. E.g.
an user can do "-cpu rv64,rva22u64=false" and have a bunch of default
rv64 extensions disabled. The recommended way of using profiles is the
rv64i CPU, but users are free to experiment.
For now we'll handle multi-letter extensions only. MISA extensions need
additional steps that we'll take care later. At this point we can boot a
Linux buildroot using rva22u64 using the following options:
-cpu rv64i,rva22u64=true,sv39=true,g=true,c=true,s=true
Note that being an usermode/application profile we still need to
explicitly set 's=true' to enable Supervisor mode to boot Linux.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-11-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
KVM does not have the means to support enabling the rva22u64 profile.
The main reasons are:
- we're missing support for some mandatory rva22u64 extensions in the
KVM module;
- we can't make promises about enabling a profile since it all depends
on host support in the end.
We'll revisit this decision in the future if needed. For now mark the
'rva22u64' profile as unavailable when running a KVM CPU:
$ qemu-system-riscv64 -machine virt,accel=kvm -cpu rv64,rva22u64=true
qemu-system-riscv64: can't apply global rv64-riscv-cpu.rva22u64=true:
'rva22u64' is not available with KVM
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-10-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The rva22U64 profile, described in:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/profiles.adoc#rva22-profiles
Contains a set of CPU extensions aimed for 64-bit userspace
applications. Enabling this set to be enabled via a single user flag
makes it convenient to enable a predictable set of features for the CPU,
giving users more predicability when running/testing their workloads.
QEMU implements all possible extensions of this profile. All the so
called 'synthetic extensions' described in the profile that are cache
related are ignored/assumed enabled (Za64rs, Zic64b, Ziccif, Ziccrse,
Ziccamoa, Zicclsm) since we do not implement a cache model.
An abstraction called RISCVCPUProfile is created to store the profile.
'ext_offsets' contains mandatory extensions that QEMU supports. Same
thing with the 'misa_ext' mask. Optional extensions must be enabled
manually in the command line if desired.
The design here is to use the common target/riscv/cpu.c file to store
the profile declaration and export it to the accelerator files. Each
accelerator is then responsible to expose it (or not) to users and how
to enable the extensions.
Next patches will implement the profile for TCG and KVM.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-9-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Named features (zic64b the sole example at this moment) aren't expose to
users, thus we need another way to expose them.
Go through each named feature, get its boolean value, do the needed
conversions (bool to qbool, qbool to QObject) and add it to output dict.
Another adjustment is needed: named features are evaluated during
finalize(), so riscv_cpu_finalize_features() needs to be mandatory
regardless of whether we have an input dict or not. Otherwise zic64b
will always return 'false', which is incorrect: the default values of
cache blocksizes ([cbom/cbop/cboz]_blocksize) are set to 64, satisfying
the conditions for zic64b.
Here's an API usage example after this patch:
$ ./build/qemu-system-riscv64 -S -M virt -display none
-qmp tcp:localhost:1234,server,wait=off
$ ./scripts/qmp/qmp-shell localhost:1234
Welcome to the QMP low-level shell!
Connected to QEMU 8.1.50
(QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"rv64"}
{"return": {"model":
{"name": "rv64", "props": {... "zic64b": true, ...}}}}
zic64b is set to 'true', as expected, since all cache sizes are 64
bytes by default.
If we change one of the cache blocksizes, zic64b is returned as 'false':
(QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"rv64","props":{"cbom_blocksize":128}}
{"return": {"model":
{"name": "rv64", "props": {... "zic64b": false, ...}}}}
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-8-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
zic64b is defined in the RVA22U64 profile [1] as a named feature for
"Cache blocks must be 64 bytes in size, naturally aligned in the address
space". It's a fantasy name for 64 bytes cache blocks. The RVA22U64
profile mandates this feature, meaning that applications using this
profile expects 64 bytes cache blocks.
To make the upcoming RVA22U64 implementation complete, we'll zic64b as
a 'named feature', not a regular extension. This means that:
- it won't be exposed to users;
- it won't be written in riscv,isa.
This will be extended to other named extensions in the future, so we're
creating some common boilerplate for them as well.
zic64b is default to 'true' since we're already using 64 bytes blocks.
If any cache block size (cbo{m,p,z}_blocksize) is changed to something
different than 64, zic64b is set to 'false'.
Our profile implementation will then be able to check the current state
of zic64b and take the appropriate action (e.g. throw a warning).
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/releases/download/v1.0/profiles.pdf
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-7-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
QEMU already implements zicbom (Cache Block Management Operations) and
zicboz (Cache Block Zero Operations). Commit 59cb29d6a5 ("target/riscv:
add Zicbop cbo.prefetch{i, r, m} placeholder") added placeholders for
what would be the instructions for zicbop (Cache Block Prefetch
Operations), which are now no-ops.
The RVA22U64 profile mandates zicbop, which means that applications that
run with this profile might expect zicbop to be present in the riscv,isa
DT and might behave badly if it's absent.
Adding zicbop as an extension will make our future RVA22U64
implementation more in line with what userspace expects and, if/when
cache block prefetch operations became relevant to QEMU, we already have
the extension flag to turn then on/off as needed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-6-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We don't have any form of a 'bare bones' CPU. rv64, our default CPUs,
comes with a lot of defaults. This is fine for most regular uses but
it's not suitable when more control of what is actually loaded in the
CPU is required.
A bare-bones CPU would be annoying to deal with if not by profile
support, a way to load a multitude of extensions with a single flag.
Profile support is going to be implemented shortly, so let's add a CPU
for it.
The new 'rv64i' CPU will have only RVI loaded. It is inspired in the
profile specification that dictates, for RVA22U64 [1]:
"RVA22U64 Mandatory Base
RV64I is the mandatory base ISA for RVA22U64"
And so it seems that RV64I is the mandatory base ISA for all profiles
listed in [1], making it an ideal CPU to use with profile support.
rv64i is a CPU of type TYPE_RISCV_BARE_CPU. It has a mix of features
from pre-existent CPUs:
- it allows extensions to be enabled, like generic CPUs;
- it will not inherit extension defaults, like vendor CPUs.
This is the minimum extension set to boot OpenSBI and buildroot using
rv64i:
./build/qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic -M virt \
-cpu rv64i,sv39=true,g=true,c=true,s=true,u=true
Our minimal riscv,isa in this case will be:
# cat /proc/device-tree/cpus/cpu@0/riscv,isa
rv64imafdc_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zca_zcd#
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/profiles.adoc
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We'll add a new bare CPU type that won't have any default priv_ver. This
means that the CPU will default to priv_ver = 0, i.e. 1.10.0.
At the same we'll allow these CPUs to enable extensions at will, but
then, if the extension has a priv_ver newer than 1.10, we'll end up
disabling it. Users will then need to manually set priv_ver to something
other than 1.10 to enable the extensions they want, which is not ideal.
Change the setter() of extensions to allow user enabled extensions to
bump the priv_ver of the CPU. This will make it convenient for users to
enable extensions for CPUs that doesn't set a default priv_ver.
This change does not affect any existing CPU: vendor CPUs does not allow
extensions to be enabled, and generic CPUs are already set to priv_ver
LATEST.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-4-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Our current logic in get/setters of MISA and multi-letter extensions
works because we have only 2 CPU types, generic and vendor, and by using
"!generic" we're implying that we're talking about vendor CPUs. When adding
a third CPU type this logic will break so let's handle it beforehand.
In set_misa_ext_cfg() and set_multi_ext_cfg(), check for "vendor" cpu instead
of "not generic". The "generic CPU" checks remaining are from
riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties() and cpu_add_multi_ext_prop() before
applying default values for the extensions.
This leaves us with:
- vendor CPUs will not allow extension enablement, all other CPUs will;
- generic CPUs will inherit default values for extensions, all others
won't.
And now we can add a new, third CPU type, that will allow extensions to
be enabled and will not inherit defaults, without changing the existing
logic.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We want to add a new CPU type for bare CPUs that will inherit specific
traits of the 2 existing types:
- it will allow for extensions to be enabled/disabled, like generic
CPUs;
- it will NOT inherit defaults, like vendor CPUs.
We can make this conditions met by adding an explicit type for the
existing vendor CPUs and change the existing logic to not imply that
"not generic" means vendor CPUs.
Let's add the "vendor" CPU type first.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231218125334.37184-2-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Add support for amocas.w/d/q instructions which are part of the ratified
Zacas extension: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-zacas
Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <rbradford@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231207153842.32401-2-rbradford@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
kvm_riscv_reg_id() returns an id encoded with an ulong size, i.e. an u32
size when running TARGET_RISCV32 and u64 when running TARGET_RISCV64.
Rename it to kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong() to enhance code readability. It'll
be in line with the existing kvm_riscv_reg_id_<size>() helpers.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231208183835.2411523-6-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Create a RISCV_CONFIG_REG() macro, similar to what other regs use, to
hide away some of the boilerplate.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231208183835.2411523-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER regs are always u64 according to the KVM API, but at
this moment we'll return u32 regs if we're running a RISCV32 target.
Use the kvm_riscv_reg_id_u64() helper in RISCV_TIMER_REG() to fix it.
Reported-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231208183835.2411523-4-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_D regs are always u64 size. Using kvm_riscv_reg_id() in
RISCV_FP_D_REG() ends up encoding the wrong size if we're running with
TARGET_RISCV32.
Create a new helper that returns a KVM ID with u64 size and use it with
RISCV_FP_D_REG().
Reported-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231208183835.2411523-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_F regs have u32 size according to the API, but by using
kvm_riscv_reg_id() in RISCV_FP_F_REG() we're returning u64 sizes when
running with TARGET_RISCV64. The most likely reason why no one noticed
this is because we're not implementing kvm_cpu_synchronize_state() in
RISC-V yet.
Create a new helper that returns a KVM ID with u32 size and use it in
RISCV_FP_F_REG().
Reported-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231208183835.2411523-2-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
mvendorid is an uint32 property, mimpid/marchid are uint64 properties.
But their getters are returning bools. The reason this went under the
radar for this long is because we have no code using the getters.
The problem can be seem via the 'qom-get' API though. Launching QEMU
with the 'veyron-v1' CPU, a model with:
VEYRON_V1_MVENDORID: 0x61f (1567)
VEYRON_V1_MIMPID: 0x111 (273)
VEYRON_V1_MARCHID: 0x8000000000010000 (9223372036854841344)
This is what the API returns when retrieving these properties:
(qemu) qom-get /machine/soc0/harts[0] mvendorid
true
(qemu) qom-get /machine/soc0/harts[0] mimpid
true
(qemu) qom-get /machine/soc0/harts[0] marchid
true
After this patch:
(qemu) qom-get /machine/soc0/harts[0] mvendorid
1567
(qemu) qom-get /machine/soc0/harts[0] mimpid
273
(qemu) qom-get /machine/soc0/harts[0] marchid
9223372036854841344
Fixes: 1e34150045 ("target/riscv/cpu.c: restrict 'mvendorid' value")
Fixes: a1863ad368 ("target/riscv/cpu.c: restrict 'mimpid' value")
Fixes: d6a427e2c0 ("target/riscv/cpu.c: restrict 'marchid' value")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231211170732.2541368-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The Sv32 page-based virtual-memory scheme described in RISCV privileged
spec Section 5.3 supports 34-bit physical addresses for RV32, so the
PMP scheme must support addresses wider than XLEN for RV32. However,
PMP address register format is still 32 bit wide.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Klokov <ivan.klokov@syntacore.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231123091214.20312-1-ivan.klokov@syntacore.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
If CPU does not implement the Vector extension, it usually means
mstatus vs hardwire to zero. So we should not allow write a
non-zero value to this field.
Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20231215023313.1708-1-zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
According to the specification, the th.dcache.cvall1 can be executed
under all priviledges.
The specification about xtheadcmo located in,
https://github.com/T-head-Semi/thead-extension-spec/blob/master/xtheadcmo/dcache_cval1.adoc
Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Message-ID: <20231208094315.177-1-zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The RISC-V v spec 16.6 section says that the whole vector register move
instructions operate as if EEW=SEW. So it should depends on the vsew
field of vtype register.
Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231129170400.21251-3-max.chou@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The ratified version of RISC-V V spec section 16.6 says that
`The instructions operate as if EEW=SEW`.
So the whole vector register move instructions depend on the vtype
register that means the whole vector register move instructions should
raise an illegal-instruction exception when vtype.vill=1.
Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20231129170400.21251-2-max.chou@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The term "iothread lock" is obsolete. The APIs use Big QEMU Lock (BQL)
in their names. Update the code comments to use "BQL" instead of
"iothread lock".
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-5-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
The name "iothread" is overloaded. Use the term Big QEMU Lock (BQL)
instead, it is already widely used and unambiguous.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-4-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
The name "iothread" is overloaded. Use the term Big QEMU Lock (BQL)
instead, it is already widely used and unambiguous.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-3-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The
actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly
referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The
locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and
qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread().
The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was
split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main
loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing
a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL.
The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the
locking APIs to:
- void bql_lock(void)
- void bql_unlock(void)
- bool bql_locked(void)
There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches
will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be
updated in later patches.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Introduce the target/loongarch/tcg directory. Its purpose is to hold the TCG
code that is selected by CONFIG_TCG
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
Message-Id: <20240102020200.3462097-2-gaosong@loongson.cn>
gdbstub.c is not specific to TCG and can be used by
other accelerators, such as KVM accelerator
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
Message-Id: <20240102020200.3462097-1-gaosong@loongson.cn>
The mcycle/minstret counter's stop flag is mistakenly updated on a copy
on stack. Thus the counter increments even when the CY/IR bit in the
mcountinhibit register is set. This commit corrects its behavior.
Fixes: 3780e33732 (target/riscv: Support mcycle/minstret write operation)
Signed-off-by: Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
This is a simple cleanup, since env is passed to qemu_irq_ack it can be
accessed from inside qemu_irq_ack. Just drop this parameter.
Co-developed-by: Frederic Konrad <konrad.frederic@yahoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Clément Chigot <chigot@adacore.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20240105102421.163554-7-chigot@adacore.com>
Use generic cpu_model_from_type() when the CPU model name needs to
be extracted from the CPU type name.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231114235628.534334-23-gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
No changes in the output from the following command.
[gshan@gshan q]$ ./build/qemu-system-tricore -cpu ?
Available CPUs:
tc1796
tc1797
tc27x
tc37x
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231114235628.534334-21-gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Before it's applied:
[gshan@gshan q]$ ./build/qemu-or1k -cpu ?
Available CPUs:
or1200
any
After it's applied:
[gshan@gshan q]$ ./build/qemu-or1k -cpu ?
Available CPUs:
any
or1200
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231114235628.534334-17-gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
No changes in the output from the following command.
[gshan@gshan q]$ ./build/qemu-system-hppa -cpu ?
Available CPUs:
hppa
hppa64
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231114235628.534334-13-gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
No changes in the output from the following command.
[gshan@gshan q]$ ./build/qemu-hexagon -cpu ?
Available CPUs:
v67
v68
v69
v71
v73
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231114235628.534334-12-gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
