init_proc_603 is defined after init_proc_e300, so I had to move some
code around to make it work.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-19-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is done to improve init_proc readability and to make subsequent
patches that touch this code a bit cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-18-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is done to improve init_proc readability and to make subsequent
patches that touch this code a bit cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-17-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is just to have 755-specific registers contained into a function,
intead of leaving them open-coded in init_proc_755. It makes init_proc
easier to read and keeps later patches that touch this code a bit
cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-16-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 745 and 755 can share the HID registration, so move it all into
register_755_sprs, which applies for both CPUs.
Also rename that function to register_745_sprs, since the 745 is the
earliest of the two. This will help with separating 755-specific
registers in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-14-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Move some of the 440 registers that are being repeated in the 440*
CPUs to register_440_sprs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We're considering these two to be from different CPU families, so
duplicate some code to keep them separate.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We're considering these two to be in different CPU families (6xx and
7xx), so keep their SPR registration separate.
The code was copied into register_G2_sprs and the common function was
renamed to apply only to the 755.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Make sure that every register_*_sprs function only has calls to
spr_register* to register individual SPRs. Do not allow nesting. This
makes the code easier to follow and a look at init_proc_* should
suffice to know what SPRs a CPU has.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Now that the 601 was removed, all of our CPUs have a timebase, so that
can be moved into the common function.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The top level init_proc calls register_generic_sprs but also registers
some other SPRs outside of that function. Let's group everything into
a single place.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The G2LE CPU initialization code is the same as the G2. Use the latter
for both.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The /* XXX : not implemented */ comments all over cpu_init are
confusing and ambiguous.
Do they mean not implemented by QEMU, not implemented in a specific
access mode? Not implemented by the CPU? Do they apply to just the
register right after or to a whole block? Do they mean we have an
action to take in the future to implement these? Are they only
informative?
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Since we've split the exception code by exception model, the exception
model IDs are becoming less useful. These two can be merged.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We don't need three separate exception model IDs for the 603, 604 and
G2.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The PowerPC 601 processor is the first generation of processors to
implement the PowerPC architecture. It was designed as a bridge
processor and also could execute most of the instructions of the
previous POWER architecture. It was found on the first Macs and IBM
RS/6000 workstations.
There is not much interest in keeping the CPU model of this
POWER-PowerPC bridge processor. We have the 603 and 604 CPU models of
the 60x family which implement the complete PowerPC instruction set.
Cc: "Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203142756.1302515-1-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This CPU was partially removed due to lack of support in 2017 by commit
aef7796057 ("ppc: remove non implemented cpu models").
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220128221611.1221715-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 602 was derived from the PowerPC 603, for the gaming market it
seems. It was hardly used and no firmware supporting the CPU could be
found. Drop support.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 405 MSR has the Machine Check Enable bit. We're making use of it
when dispatching Machine Check, so add the bit to the msr_mask.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Bit 13 is the Wait State Enable bit. Give it its proper name.
As far as I can see we don't do anything with MSR_POW for the 405, so
this change has no effect.
Suggested-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
ISA v2.03 introduced Floating Round to Integer instructions : frin,
friz, frip, and frim. Add them to POWER5+.
The PPC_FLOAT_EXT flag also includes the fre (Floating Reciprocal
Estimate) instruction which was introduced in ISA v2.0x. The
architecture document says its optional and that might be the reason
why it has been kept under the PPC_FLOAT_EXT flag. This means 970 CPUs
can not use it under QEMU, which doesn't seem to be a problem.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
popcntb instruction was added in ISA v2.02. Add support for POWER5+
processors since they implement ISA v2.03.
PPC970 CPUs implement v2.01 and do not support popcntb.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220105095142.3990430-2-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is the combination of frozen bit and counter type, on a per
counter basis. So far this is only used by HFLAGS_INSN_CNT, but
will be used more later.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
[danielhb: fixed PMC4 cyc_cnt shift, insn run latch code,
MMCR0_FC handling, "PMC[1-6]" comment]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220103224746.167831-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Rework slightly ppc_cpu_dump_state() to replace the various 'if'
statements with a 'switch'.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211222064025.1541490-9-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220103063441.3424853-10-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The PID SPR of the 405 CPU contains the translation ID of the TLB
which is a 8-bit field. Enforce the mask with a store helper.
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211222064025.1541490-8-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220103063441.3424853-9-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 405 timers were broken when booke support was added. Assumption
was made that the register numbers were the same but it's not :
SPR_BOOKE_TSR (0x150)
SPR_BOOKE_TCR (0x154)
SPR_40x_TSR (0x3D8)
SPR_40x_TCR (0x3DA)
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Fixes: ddd1055b07 ("PPC: booke timers")
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211222064025.1541490-5-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220103063441.3424853-6-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
PM_RUN_INST_CMPL, instructions completed with the run latch set, is
the architected PowerISA v3.1 event defined with PMC4SEL = 0xFA.
Implement it by checking for the CTRL RUN bit before incrementing the
counter. To make this work properly we also need to force a new
translation block each time SPR_CTRL is written. A small tweak in
pmu_increment_insns() is then needed to only increment this event
if the thread has the run latch.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211201151734.654994-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
MMCR1 determines the events to be sampled by the PMU. Updating the
counters at every MMCR1 write ensures that we're not sampling more
or less events by looking only at MMCR0 and the PMCs.
It is worth noticing that both the Book3S PowerPC PMU, and this IBM
Power8+ PMU that we're modeling, also uses MMCRA, MMCR2 and MMCR3 to
control the PMU. These three registers aren't being handled in this
initial implementation, so for now we're controlling all the PMU
aspects using MMCR0, MMCR1 and the PMCs.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211201151734.654994-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Calling pmu_update_cycles() on every PMC read/write operation ensures
that the values being fetched are up to date with the current PMU state.
In theory we can get away by just trapping PMCs reads, but we're going
to trap PMC writes to deal with counter overflow logic later on. Let's
put the required wiring for that and make our lives a bit easier in the
next patches.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211201151734.654994-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This patch adds the barebones of the PMU logic by enabling cycle
counting. The overall logic goes as follows:
- MMCR0 reg initial value is set to 0x80000000 (MMCR0_FC set) to avoid
having to spin the PMU right at system init;
- to retrieve the events that are being profiled, pmc_get_event() will
check the current MMCR0 and MMCR1 value and return the appropriate
PMUEventType. For PMCs 1-4, event 0x2 is the implementation dependent
value of PMU_EVENT_INSTRUCTIONS and event 0x1E is the implementation
dependent value of PMU_EVENT_CYCLES. These events are supported by IBM
Power chips since Power8, at least, and the Linux Perf driver makes use
of these events until kernel v5.15. For PMC1, event 0xF0 is the
architected PowerISA event for cycles. Event 0xFE is the architected
PowerISA event for instructions;
- if the counter is frozen, either via the global MMCR0_FC bit or its
individual frozen counter bits, PMU_EVENT_INACTIVE is returned;
- pmu_update_cycles() will go through each counter and update the
values of all PMCs that are counting cycles. This function will be
called every time a MMCR0 update is done to keep counters values
up to date. Upcoming patches will use this function to allow the
counters to be properly updated during read/write of the PMCs
and MMCR1 writes.
Given that the base CPU frequency is fixed at 1Ghz for both powernv and
pseries clock, cycle calculation assumes that 1 nanosecond equals 1 CPU
cycle. Cycle value is then calculated by adding the elapsed time, in
nanoseconds, of the last cycle update done via pmu_update_cycles().
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211201151734.654994-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This patch starts an IBM Power8+ compatible PMU implementation by adding
the representation of PMU events that we are going to sample,
PMUEventType. This enum represents a Perf event that is being sampled by
a specific counter 'sprn'. Events that aren't available (i.e. no event
was set in MMCR1) will be of type 'PMU_EVENT_INVALID'. Events that are
inactive due to frozen counter bits state are of type
'PMU_EVENT_INACTIVE'. Other types added in this patch are
PMU_EVENT_CYCLES and PMU_EVENT_INSTRUCTIONS. More types will be added
later on.
Let's also add the required PMU cycle overflow timers. They will be used
to trigger cycle overflows when cycle events are being sampled. This
timer will call cpu_ppc_pmu_timer_cb(), which in turn calls
fire_PMC_interrupt(). Both functions are stubs that will be implemented
later on when EBB support is added.
Two new helper files are created to host this new logic.
cpu_ppc_pmu_init() will init all overflow timers during CPU init time.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211201151734.654994-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
When Altivec support was added to the e6500 kernel in 2012[1], the
QEMU code was not changed, so we don't register the VPU/VPUA
exceptions for the e6500:
qemu: fatal: Raised an exception without defined vector 73
Note that the error message says 73, instead of 32, which is the IVOR
for VPU. This is because QEMU knows only knows about the VPU interrupt
for the 7400s. In theory, we should not be raising _that_ VPU
interrupt, but instead another one specific for the e6500.
We unfortunately cannot register e6500-specific VPU/VPUA interrupts
because the SPEU/EFPDI interrupts also use IVOR32/33. These are
present only in the e500v1/2 versions. From the user manual:
e500v1, e500v2: only SPEU/EFPDI/EFPRI
e500mc, e5500: no SPEU/EFPDI/EFPRI/VPU/VPUA
e6500: only VPU/VPUA
So I'm leaving IVOR32/33 as SPEU/EFPDI, but altering the dispatch code
to convert the VPU #73 to a #32 when we're in the e6500. Since the
handling for SPEU and VPU is the same this is the only change that's
needed. The EFPDI is not implemented and will cause an abort. I don't
think it worth it changing the error message to take VPUA into
consideration, so I'm not changing anything there.
This bug was discussed in the thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2021-06/msg00222.html
1- https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/cd66cc2ee52
Reported-by: <mario@locati.it>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213133542.2608540-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
They have been there since 2007 without any board using them, most
were protected by a TODO define. Drop support.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211202191108.1291515-1-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The exception model id for 601v has been removed without mention
why. I assume it was inadvertent and restore it here.
Fixes: b632a148b6 ("target-ppc: Use QOM method dispatch for MMU fault handling")
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211208123029.2052625-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 603e uses the same exception code as 603 so we don't need a
dedicated entry for it.
This is only a removal of redundant code, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211208123029.2052625-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The Floating-point Unavailable and Decrementer interrupts are being
registered at the same 0x900 address. The FPU should be at 0x800
instead.
Verified on MPC555, MPC860 and MPC885 user manuals.
Reported-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211208123029.2052625-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
(Applies to 7441, 7445, 7450, 7451, 7455, 7457, 7447, 7447a and 7448)
The QEMU-side software TLB implementation for the 7450 family of CPUs
is being removed due to lack of known users in the real world. The
last users in the code were removed by the two previous commits.
A brief history:
The feature was added in QEMU by commit 7dbe11acd8 ("Handle all MMU
models in switches...") with the mention that Linux was not able to
handle the TLB miss interrupts and the MMU model would be kept
disabled.
At some point later, commit 8ca3f6c382 ("Allow selection of all
defined PowerPC 74xx (aka G4) CPUs.") enabled the model for the 7450
family without further justification.
We have since the year 2011 [1] been unable to run OpenBIOS in the
7450s and have not heard of any other software that is used with those
CPUs in QEMU. Attempts were made to find a guest OS that implemented
the TLB miss handlers and none were found among Linux 5.15, FreeBSD 13,
MacOS9, MacOSX and MorphOS 3.15.
All CPUs that registered this feature were moved to an MMU model that
replaces the software TLB with a QEMU hardware TLB
implementation. They can now run the same software as the 7400 CPUs,
including the OSes mentioned above.
References:
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/812398https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/86
- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2021-11/msg00289.html
message id: 20211119134431.406753-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211130230123.781844-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The e600 CPU is a successor of the 7448 and like all the 7450s CPUs,
it has an optional software TLB feature.
We have determined that there is no OS software support for the 7450
software TLB available these days. See the previous commit for more
information.
This patch disables the SPRs and instructions related to software TLB
from the e600 CPU.
No functional change intended. These facilities should be used by the
OS in interrupt handlers for interrupts that QEMU never generates.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211130230123.781844-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
(Applies to 7441, 7445, 7450, 7451, 7455, 7457, 7447 and 7447a)*
We have since 2011 [1] been unable to run OpenBIOS in the 7450s and
have not heard of any other software that is used with those CPUs in
QEMU. A current discussion [2] shows that the 7450 software TLB is
unsupported in Linux 5.15, FreeBSD 13, MacOS9, MacOSX and MorphOS
3.15. With no known support in firmware or OS, this means that no code
for any of the 7450 CPUs is ever ran in QEMU.
Since the implementation in QEMU of the 7400 MMU is the same as the
7450, except for the software TLB vs. hardware TLB search, this patch
changes all 7450 cpus to the 7400 MMU model. This has the practical
effect of disabling the software TLB feature while keeping other
aspects of address translation working as expected.
This allow us to run software on the 7450 family again.
*- note that the 7448 is currently aliased in QEMU for a 7400, so it
is unaffected by this change.
1- https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/812398https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/86
2- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2021-11/msg00289.html
message id: 20211119134431.406753-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211130230123.781844-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Record DAR, DSISR, and exception_index. That last means
that we must exit to cpu_loop ourselves, instead of letting
exception_index being overwritten.
This is exactly what the user-mode ppc_cpu_tlb_fill does,
so simply rename it as ppc_cpu_record_sigsegv.
Reviewed-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
I noticed -cpu help printing enough trailing spaces to make the output
at least 84 characters wide. Looks ugly unless the terminal is wider.
Ugly or not, trailing spaces are stupid.
The culprit is this line in x86_cpu_list_entry():
qemu_printf("x86 %-20s %-58s\n", name, desc);
This prints a string with minimum field left-justified right before a
newline. Change it to
qemu_printf("x86 %-20s %s\n", name, desc);
which avoids the trailing spaces and is simpler to boot.
A search for the pattern with "git-grep -E '%-[0-9]+s\\n'" found a few
more instances. Change them similarly.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211009152401.2982862-1-armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Problem state needs to be able to read and write the PMU counters,
otherwise it won't be aware of any sampling result that the PMU produces
after a Perf run.
This patch does that in a similar fashion as already done in the
previous patches. PMCs 5 and 6 have a special condition, aside from the
constraints that are common with PMCs 1-4, where they are not part of the
PMU if MMCR0_PMCC is 0b11.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211018010133.315842-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Similar to the previous patch, let's add problem state read/write access to
the MMCR2 SPR, which is also a group A PMU SPR that needs to be filtered
to be read/written by userspace.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211018010133.315842-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Userspace need access to PMU SPRs to be able to operate the PMU. One of
such SPRs is MMCR0.
MMCR0, as defined by PowerISA v3.1, is classified as a 'group A' PMU
register. This class of registers has common read/write rules that are
governed by MMCR0 PMCC bits. MMCR0 is also not fully exposed to problem
state: only MMCR0_FC, MMCR0_PMAO and MMCR0_PMAE bits are
readable/writable in this case.
This patch exposes MMCR0 to userspace by doing the following:
- two new callbacks, spr_read_MMCR0_ureg() and spr_write_MMCR0_ureg(),
are added to be used as problem state read/write callbacks of UMMCR0.
Both callbacks filters the amount of bits userspace is able to
read/write by using a MMCR0_UREG_MASK;
- problem state access control is done by the spr_groupA_read_allowed()
and spr_groupA_write_allowed() helpers. These helpers will read the
current PMCC bits from DisasContext and check whether the read/write
MMCR0 operation is valid or noti;
- to avoid putting exclusive PMU logic into the already loaded
translate.c file, let's create a new 'power8-pmu-regs.c.inc' file that
will hold all the spr_read/spr_write functions of PMU registers.
The 'power8' name of this new file intends to hint about the proven
support of the PMU logic to be added. The code has been tested with the
IBM POWER chip family, POWER8 being the oldest version tested. This
doesn't mean that the PMU logic will break with any other PPC64 chip
that implements Book3s, but rather that we can't assert that it works
properly with any Book3s compliant chip.
CC: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gromero@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211018010133.315842-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
