Put the SPR registration macros in a header that is accessible outside
of cpu_init.c. The following patches will move CPU-specific code to
separate files and will need to access it.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-26-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The following patches will move CPU-specific code into separate files,
so expose the most used SPR registration functions:
register_sdr1_sprs | 22 callers
register_low_BATs | 20 callers
register_non_embedded_sprs | 19 callers
register_high_BATs | 10 callers
register_thrm_sprs | 8 callers
register_usprgh_sprs | 6 callers
register_6xx_7xx_soft_tlb | only 3 callers, but it helps to
keep the soft TLB code consistent.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-25-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Initial intent for the spr_tcg header was to expose the spr_read|write
callbacks that are only used by TCG code. However, although these
routines are TCG-specific, the KVM code needs access to env->sprs
which creation is currently coupled to the callback registration.
We are probably not going to decouple SPR creation and TCG callback
registration any time soon, so let's rename the header to spr_common
to accomodate the register_*_sprs functions that will be moved out of
cpu_init.c in the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-24-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This function registers just one SPR and has only two callers, so open
code it.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-23-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The important part of this function is that it applies to non-embedded
CPUs, not that it also applies to the 601. We removed support for the
601 anyway, so rename this function.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-22-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The init_proc_755 function is identical to the 745 one except for the
755-specific registers. I think it is worth it to make them share
code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-21-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
init_proc_603 is defined after init_proc_e300, so I had to move some
code around to make it work.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-19-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is done to improve init_proc readability and to make subsequent
patches that touch this code a bit cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-18-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is done to improve init_proc readability and to make subsequent
patches that touch this code a bit cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-17-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is just to have 755-specific registers contained into a function,
intead of leaving them open-coded in init_proc_755. It makes init_proc
easier to read and keeps later patches that touch this code a bit
cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-16-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 745 and 755 can share the HID registration, so move it all into
register_755_sprs, which applies for both CPUs.
Also rename that function to register_745_sprs, since the 745 is the
earliest of the two. This will help with separating 755-specific
registers in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-14-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Move some of the 440 registers that are being repeated in the 440*
CPUs to register_440_sprs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We're considering these two to be from different CPU families, so
duplicate some code to keep them separate.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We're considering these two to be in different CPU families (6xx and
7xx), so keep their SPR registration separate.
The code was copied into register_G2_sprs and the common function was
renamed to apply only to the 755.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Make sure that every register_*_sprs function only has calls to
spr_register* to register individual SPRs. Do not allow nesting. This
makes the code easier to follow and a look at init_proc_* should
suffice to know what SPRs a CPU has.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Now that the 601 was removed, all of our CPUs have a timebase, so that
can be moved into the common function.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The top level init_proc calls register_generic_sprs but also registers
some other SPRs outside of that function. Let's group everything into
a single place.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The G2LE CPU initialization code is the same as the G2. Use the latter
for both.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The /* XXX : not implemented */ comments all over cpu_init are
confusing and ambiguous.
Do they mean not implemented by QEMU, not implemented in a specific
access mode? Not implemented by the CPU? Do they apply to just the
register right after or to a whole block? Do they mean we have an
action to take in the future to implement these? Are they only
informative?
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce virtual hypervisor methods that can support a "Nested KVM HV"
implementation using the bare metal 2-level radix MMU, and using HV
exceptions to return from H_ENTER_NESTED (rather than cause interrupts).
HV exceptions can now be raised in the TCG spapr machine when running a
nested KVM HV guest. The main ones are the lev==1 syscall, the hdecr,
hdsi and hisi, hv fu, and hv emu, and h_virt external interrupts.
HV exceptions are intercepted in the exception handler code and instead
of causing interrupts in the guest and switching the machine to HV mode,
they go to the vhyp where it may exit the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall with the
interrupt vector numer as return value as required by the hcall API.
Address translation is provided by the 2-level page table walker that is
implemented for the bare metal radix MMU. The partition scope page table
is pointed to the L1's partition scope by the get_pate vhc method.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-9-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This moves the logic to reset the QEMU exception state into its own
function.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
[ clg: checkpatch fixes ]
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-8-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The virtual hypervisor currently always intercepts and handles
hypercalls but with a future change this will not always be the case.
Add a helper for the test so the logic is abstracted from the mechanism.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-7-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
In prepartion for implementing a full partition table option for
vhyp, update the get_pate method to take an lpid and return a
success/fail indicator.
The spapr implementation currently just asserts lpid is always 0
and always return success.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
[ clg: checkpatch fixes ]
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-6-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The radix on vhyp MMU uses a single-level radix table walk, with the
partition scope mapping provided by the flat QEMU machine memory.
A subsequent change will use the two-level radix walk on vhyp in some
situations, so provide a helper which can abstract that logic.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-5-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Invalid or missing partition table entry exceptions should cause HV
interrupts. HDSISR is set to bad MMU config, which is consistent with
the ISA and experimentally matches what POWER9 generates.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
[ clg: checkpatch fixes ]
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-2-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
ISA v3.1 changed some VSX instructions behavior by changing what the
other words/doubleword in the result should contain when the result is
only one word/doubleword. e.g. xsmaxdp operates on doubleword 0 and
saves the result also in doubleword 0.
Before, the second doubleword result was undefined according to the
ISA, but now it's stated that it should be zeroed.
Even tough the result was undefined before, hardware implementing these
instructions already filled these fields with 0s. Changing every ISA
version in QEMU to this behavior makes the results match what happens
in hardware.
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220204181944.65063-1-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We don't really need to check for exception model while applying
AIL. We can check the lpcr_mask for the presence of
LPCR_AIL/LPCR_HAIL.
This removes one more instance of passing the exception model ID
around.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We currently abort QEMU during the dispatch of an interrupt if we try
to set MSR_HV without having MSR_HVB in the msr_mask. I think we
should verify this for all MSR bits. There is no reason to ever have a
MSR bit set if the corresponding bit is not set in that CPU's
msr_mask.
Note that this is not about the emulated code setting reserved
bits. We clear the new_msr when starting to dispatch an exception, so
if we end up with bits not present in the msr_mask that is a QEMU
programming error.
I kept the HSRR verification for BookS because it is the only CPU
family that has HSRRs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Make the cpu-specific powerpc_excp_* functions a bit simpler by moving
the bounds check and logging to powerpc_excp.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Now that all CPU families have their own separate exception
dispatching code we can remove powerpc_excp_legacy.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 7xx CPUs don't have alternate/hypervisor Save and Restore
Registers, so we can set SRR0 and SRR1 directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This code applies only to the 7xx CPUs, so we can remove the switch
statement.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Thre is no HV support in the 7xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Remove the BookE code and add a comment explaining why we need to keep
hypercall support even though this CPU does not have a hypervisor
mode.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no ESR in the 7xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no MSR_HV in the 7xx so remove the LPES0 handling.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no MSR_HV in the 7xx.
Also remove 40x and BookE code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Differences from the generic powerpc_excp code:
- Not BookE, so some MSR bits are cleared at interrupt dispatch;
- No MSR_HV;
- No power saving states;
- No Hypervisor Emulation Assistance;
- Not 64 bits;
- No System call vectored;
- No Alternate Interrupt Location.
Exceptions used:
POWERPC_EXCP_ALIGN
POWERPC_EXCP_DECR
POWERPC_EXCP_DLTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_DSI
POWERPC_EXCP_DSTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_EXTERNAL
POWERPC_EXCP_FPU
POWERPC_EXCP_IABR
POWERPC_EXCP_IFTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_ISI
POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK
POWERPC_EXCP_PERFM
POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM
POWERPC_EXCP_RESET
POWERPC_EXCP_SMI
POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL
POWERPC_EXCP_THERM
POWERPC_EXCP_TRACE
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for PowerPC 7xx CPUs
(740, 745, 750, 750cl, 750cx, 750fx, 750gx, 755). This commit copies
powerpc_excp_legacy verbatim so the next one has a clean diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Since we've split the exception code by exception model, the exception
model IDs are becoming less useful. These two can be merged.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 6xx CPUs don't have alternate/hypervisor Save and Restore
Registers, so we can set SRR0 and SRR1 directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-12-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This code applies only to the 6xx CPUs, so we can remove the switch
statement.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no HV support in the 6xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no Hypervisor mode in the 6xx CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
