When closing variables during 'coroutine.close' or 'lua_resetthread',
the status of a coroutine must be set to LUA_OK; a coroutine should
not run with any other status. (See assertion in 'lua_callk'.)
After the reset, the status should be kept as normal, as any error
was already reported.
Instead of assuming that shrinking a block may be an emergency
collection, use an explicit field ('gcstopem') to stop emergency
collections while GC is working.
More uses of macros 'likely'/'unlikely' (renamed to
'l_likely'/'l_unlikely'), both in range (extended to the
libraries) and in scope (extended to hooks, stack growth).
To-be-closed variables are linked in their own list, embedded into the
stack elements. (Due to alignment, this information does not change
the size of the stack elements in most architectures.) This new list
does not produce garbage and avoids memory errors when creating tbc
variables.
Initial implementation to allow yields inside '__close' metamethods.
This current version still does not allow a '__close' metamethod
to yield when called due to an error. '__close' metamethods from
C functions also are not allowed to yield.
When a stack grows, its extra area can be in use, and it becomes part
of the common area. So, the extra area must be kept correct all the
times. (Bug introduced by commit 5aa36e894f5.)
Hashes for long strings are computed only when they are used as keys
in a table, not a too common case. And, in that case, it is to easy to
force collisions changing only the characters which are not part of the
hash.
The stack size is derived from 'stack_last', when needed. Moreover,
the handling of stack sizes is more consistent, always excluding the
extra space except when allocating/deallocating the array.
The previous stackless implementations marked all 'luaV_execute'
invocations as fresh. However, re-entering 'luaV_execute' when
resuming a coroutine should not be a fresh invocation. (It works
because 'unroll' called 'luaV_execute' for each call entry, but
it was slower than letting 'luaV_execute' finish all non-fresh
invocations.)
A "with stack" implementation gains too little in performance to be
worth all the noise from C-stack overflows.
This commit is almost a sketch, to test performance. There are several
pending stuff:
- review control of C-stack overflow and error messages;
- what to do with setcstacklimit;
- review comments;
- review unroll of Lua calls.
OLD1 objects can be potentially anywhere in the 'allgc' list (up
to 'reallyold'), but frequently they are all after 'old1' (natural
evolution of survivals) or do not exist at all (when all objects die
young). So, instead of 'markold' starts looking for them always
from the start of 'allgc', the collector keeps an extra pointer,
'firstold1', that points to the first OLD1 object in the 'allgc' list,
or is NULL if there are no OLD1 objects in that list.
The field 'L->oldpc' is not always updated when control returns to a
function; an invalid value can seg. fault when computing 'changedline'.
(One example is an error in a finalizer; control can return to
'luaV_execute' without executing 'luaD_poscall'.) Instead of trying to
fix all possible corner cases, it seems safer to be resilient to invalid
values for 'oldpc'. Valid but wrong values at most cause an extra call
to a line hook.
'lua_resetthread' should reset the CallInfo list before calling
'luaF_close'. luaF_close can call functions, and those functions
should not run with dead functions still in the CallInfo list.
Collisions in short strings occurr just by their existence, when
internalizing them. (Collisions in long strings is caused/controlled
by the program, when adding them as keys to the same table.)
New threads were being created with very small C-stack limits.
This is not a problem for coroutines, because 'lua_resume' sets
a new limit, but not all threads are coroutines.
- Better documentation in 'testes/cstack.lua' about using
'debug.setCstacklimit' to find a good limit.
- Constant LUAI_MAXCSTACK gets added CSTACKERR (extra stack for
error handling), so that it is compatible with the argument to
'debug.setCstacklimit'.
To-be-closed variables in C use 'ci.nresults' to code that there is
a variable to be closed in that function. The intialization of the
base C level (the one "running" when calling API functions outside
any Lua call) did not initialize 'ci.nresults', creating (correct)
warnings in valgrind.
The limit LUAI_MAXCCALLS was renamed LUAI_MAXCSTACK, which better
represents its meaning. Moreover, its definition was moved to
'luaconf.h', given its importance now that Lua does not use
a "stackless" implementation.
- The warning functions get an extra parameter that tells whether
message is to be continued (instead of using end-of-lines as a signal).
- The user data for the warning function is a regular value, instead
of a writable slot inside the Lua state.
After a major bad collection (one that collects too few objects),
next collection will be major again. In that case, avoid switching
back to generational mode (as it will have to switch again to
incremental to do next major collection).
