the BAR-printing function to print a name for the register, factor out
a common register-bits function which can handle the fact that type 2
headers have a different size than is usual, and actually do something
useful with the rest of the bits in the type 2 header.
printing into a function, add a bit more pretty-printing of existing stuff.
Implement pretty-printers for type 1 and type 2 headers. (Right now,
these are just quick stabs based on some on-line bridge docs that I have
handy on my laptop. Mmmm, meetings. I'll check the bits when I get
back within reach of my official docs.)
* print all configuration space registers. Then, where possible,
interpret them. (That is, PRESENT ALL THE DATA, then interpret it --
don't hide data behind interpretation. Also, when interpreting
fields, try to print out the specific value that's being interpreted.)
* handle different header types.
* allow caller to specify a function which can interpret the
device-dependent header and is responsible for pretty-printing it.
It spews (use 'options MSGBUFSIZE=...' 8-), but when you want the data,
you really want _all_ of it.
Still needs some cleanup and additional code (e.g. interepretation
of PCI-PCI (type 1) and PCI-Cardbus (type 2(?)) bridge headers).
(1) remove the 'UNSUPP' keyword from the device list,
because it can't be reasonably used (becuase different
devices may be supported on different machines, for
good reason).
(2) enhance pci_devinfo so that class/subclass information
is optional (so pci_devinfo can be used by drivers that
match classes of devices, and want to look up the
devices' names easily).
(3) more known vendors and devices.
vendor & product IDs and class information, which is printed if device
isn't found. Optionally (via "PCIVERBOSE" option) does table lookup
to try to see if it knows what the device really is (informational only...).
(pci_attach_subdev()). remove pciattach() function and the pcicd cfdriver
struct, the former because thre are a lot of attachment actions which really
are machine-dependent (perhaps even "most"), and the latter because now that
both pcimatch() and pciattach() are machine-dependent it's bad style to
declare them here and it gains nothing.
drochner