Address all compiler complaints from -Wshadow in qemu-nbd. Several
instances of 'int ret' became shadows when commit 4fbec260 added 'ret'
at a higher scope in main. More interesting was the 'void *ret'
capturing the result of a pthread; where we were conceptually doing
'(void*)(intptr_t)EXIT_FAILURE != NULL' which just feels wrong (even
though it happens to compile correctly), so it was worth a better
cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230922205019.2755352-2-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
This is confusing as one 'action' variable is used for storing
a SCMP_ enum value, while the other 'action' variable is used
for storing a SECCOMP_ enum value.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230922160644.438631-3-berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Both instances of 'ret' are used to store a gnutls API return code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230922160644.438631-2-berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
This patch fixes the warning of shadowed local variable:
../hw/i386/intel_iommu.c: In function ‘vtd_address_space_unmap’:
../hw/i386/intel_iommu.c:3773:18: warning: declaration of ‘size’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
3773 | uint64_t size = mask + 1;
| ^~~~
../hw/i386/intel_iommu.c:3747:12: note: shadowed declaration is here
3747 | hwaddr size, remain;
| ^~~~
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230922160410.138786-1-peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
commit 8137355e85 ("aspeed/timer: Fix behaviour running Linux")
introduced a MAX() expression to calculate the next timer deadline :
return calculate_time(t, MAX(MAX(t->match[0], t->match[1]), 0));
The second MAX() is not necessary since the compared values are an
unsigned and 0. Simply remove it and fix warning :
../hw/timer/aspeed_timer.c: In function ‘calculate_next’:
../include/qemu/osdep.h:396:31: warning: declaration of ‘_a’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
396 | typeof(1 ? (a) : (b)) _a = (a), _b = (b); \
| ^~
../hw/timer/aspeed_timer.c:170:12: note: in expansion of macro ‘MAX’
170 | next = MAX(MAX(calculate_match(t, 0), calculate_match(t, 1)), 0);
| ^~~
../hw/timer/aspeed_timer.c:170:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘MAX’
170 | next = MAX(MAX(calculate_match(t, 0), calculate_match(t, 1)), 0);
| ^~~
/home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-aspeed.git/include/qemu/osdep.h:396:31: note: shadowed declaration is here
396 | typeof(1 ? (a) : (b)) _a = (a), _b = (b); \
| ^~
../hw/timer/aspeed_timer.c:170:12: note: in expansion of macro ‘MAX’
170 | next = MAX(MAX(calculate_match(t, 0), calculate_match(t, 1)), 0);
| ^~~
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20230922155924.1172019-5-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Remove superfluous local 'irq' variables and use the one define at the
top of the routine. This fixes warnings in aspeed_soc_ast2600_realize()
such as :
../hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c: In function ‘aspeed_soc_ast2600_realize’:
../hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c:420:18: warning: declaration of ‘irq’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
420 | qemu_irq irq = aspeed_soc_get_irq(s, ASPEED_DEV_TIMER1 + i);
| ^~~
../hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c:312:14: note: shadowed declaration is here
312 | qemu_irq irq;
| ^~~
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20230922155924.1172019-3-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Remove superfluous local 'data' variable and use the one define at the
top of the routine. This fixes :
../hw/i2c/aspeed_i2c.c: In function ‘aspeed_i2c_bus_recv’:
../hw/i2c/aspeed_i2c.c:315:17: warning: declaration of ‘data’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
315 | uint8_t data;
| ^~~~
../hw/i2c/aspeed_i2c.c:288:13: note: shadowed declaration is here
288 | uint8_t data;
| ^~~~
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20230922155924.1172019-2-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
The STE_CTXPTR() and STE_S2TTB() macros both extract two halves
of an address from fields in the STE and combine them into a
single value to return. The current code for this uses a GCC
statement expression. There are two problems with this:
(1) The type chosen for the variable in the statement expr
is 'unsigned long', which might not be 64 bits
(2) the name chosen for the variable causes -Wshadow warnings
because it's the same as a variable in use at the callsite:
In file included from ../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c:34:
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c: In function ‘smmu_get_cd’:
../../hw/arm/smmuv3-internal.h:538:23: warning: declaration of ‘addr’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
538 | unsigned long addr; \
| ^~~~
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c:339:23: note: in expansion of macro ‘STE_CTXPTR’
339 | dma_addr_t addr = STE_CTXPTR(ste);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c:339:16: note: shadowed declaration is here
339 | dma_addr_t addr = STE_CTXPTR(ste);
| ^~~~
Sidestep both of these problems by just using a single
expression rather than a statement expr.
For CMD_ADDR, we got the type of the variable right but still
run into -Wshadow problems:
In file included from ../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c:34:
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c: In function ‘smmuv3_range_inval’:
../../hw/arm/smmuv3-internal.h:334:22: warning: declaration of ‘addr’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
334 | uint64_t addr = high << 32 | (low << 12); \
| ^~~~
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c:1104:28: note: in expansion of macro ‘CMD_ADDR’
1104 | dma_addr_t end, addr = CMD_ADDR(cmd);
| ^~~~~~~~
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c:1104:21: note: shadowed declaration is here
1104 | dma_addr_t end, addr = CMD_ADDR(cmd);
| ^~~~
so convert it too.
CD_TTB has neither problem, but it is the only other macro in
the file that uses this pattern, so we convert it also for
consistency's sake.
We use extract64() rather than extract32() to avoid having
to explicitly cast the result to uint64_t.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230922152944.3583438-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Avoid shadowing a variable in smmuv3_notify_iova():
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c: In function ‘smmuv3_notify_iova’:
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c:1043:23: warning: declaration of ‘event’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=local]
1043 | SMMUEventInfo event = {.inval_ste_allowed = true};
| ^~~~~
../../hw/arm/smmuv3.c:1038:19: note: shadowed declaration is here
1038 | IOMMUTLBEvent event;
| ^~~~~
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230922152944.3583438-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Avoid shadowing a local variable in arm_sysctl_write():
../../hw/misc/arm_sysctl.c: In function ‘arm_sysctl_write’:
../../hw/misc/arm_sysctl.c:537:26: warning: declaration of ‘val’ shadows a parameter [-Wshadow=local]
537 | uint32_t val;
| ^~~
../../hw/misc/arm_sysctl.c:388:39: note: shadowed declaration is here
388 | uint64_t val, unsigned size)
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230922152944.3583438-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Avoid shadowing a local variable in do_process_its_cmd():
../../hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c:548:17: warning: declaration of ‘ite’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
548 | ITEntry ite = {};
| ^~~
../../hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c:518:13: note: shadowed declaration is here
518 | ITEntry ite;
| ^~~
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230922152944.3583438-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Code changes in acpi that addresses all compiler complaints coming from enabling
-Wshadow flags. Enabling -Wshadow catches cases of local variables shadowing
other local variables or parameters. These makes the code confusing and/or adds
bugs that are difficult to catch. See also
Subject: Help wanted for enabling -Wshadow=local
Message-Id: <87r0mqlf9x.fsf@pond.sub.org>
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87r0mqlf9x.fsf@pond.sub.org
The code is tested to build with and without the flag turned on.
CC: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
CC: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@linaro.org>
CC: mst@redhat.com
CC: imammedo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230922124203.127110-1-anisinha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fixes build with -Wshadow=local
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Message-ID: <20230922105742.81317-1-berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Rename SysBusDevice variable to avoid this warning :
../hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c: In function ‘spapr_phb_realize’:
../hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c:1872:24: warning: declaration of ‘s’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=local]
1872 | SpaprPhbState *s;
| ^
../hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c:1829:19: note: shadowed declaration is here
1829 | SysBusDevice *s = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);
| ^
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20230918145850.241074-8-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Remove extra 'drc_index' variable to avoid this warning :
../hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c: In function ‘rtas_ibm_configure_connector’:
../hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c:1240:26: warning: declaration of ‘drc_index’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
1240 | uint32_t drc_index = spapr_drc_index(drc);
| ^~~~~~~~~
../hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c:1155:14: note: shadowed declaration is here
1155 | uint32_t drc_index;
| ^~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20230918145850.241074-7-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Remove extra 'i' variable to fix this warning :
../hw/ppc/spapr.c: In function ‘spapr_init_cpus’:
../hw/ppc/spapr.c:2668:13: warning: declaration of ‘i’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
2668 | int i;
| ^
../hw/ppc/spapr.c:2645:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
2645 | int i;
| ^
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20230918145850.241074-5-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Introduce a helper routine defining one CPU device node to fix this
warning :
../hw/ppc/spapr.c: In function ‘spapr_dt_cpus’:
../hw/ppc/spapr.c:812:19: warning: declaration of ‘cs’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
812 | CPUState *cs = rev[i];
| ^~
../hw/ppc/spapr.c:786:15: note: shadowed declaration is here
786 | CPUState *cs;
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20230918145850.241074-4-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
this fixes numerous warnings of this type :
In file included from ../hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c:43:
../hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c: In function ‘spapr_dt_phb’:
../include/hw/ppc/fdt.h:18:13: warning: declaration of ‘ret’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
18 | int ret = (exp); \
| ^~~
../hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c:2355:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘_FDT’
2355 | _FDT(bus_off = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, 0, phb->dtbusname));
| ^~~~
../hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c:2311:24: note: shadowed declaration is here
2311 | int bus_off, i, j, ret;
| ^~~
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20230918145850.241074-2-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
hw/intc/openpic.c: In function ‘openpic_gbl_write’:
hw/intc/openpic.c:614:17: warning: declaration of ‘idx’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
614 | int idx;
| ^~~
hw/intc/openpic.c:568:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
568 | int idx;
| ^~~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904162824.85385-3-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
softmmu/memory.c: In function ‘mtree_print_mr’:
softmmu/memory.c:3236:27: warning: declaration of ‘ml’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
3236 | MemoryRegionList *ml;
| ^~
softmmu/memory.c:3213:32: note: shadowed declaration is here
3213 | MemoryRegionList *new_ml, *ml, *next_ml;
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-22-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
hw/mips/boston.c:472:5: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, name, "reg", reg_base, reg_size);
^
include/sysemu/device_tree.h:129:13: note: expanded from macro 'qemu_fdt_setprop_cells'
int i;
^
hw/mips/boston.c:461:9: note: previous declaration is here
int i;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-21-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
linux-user/strace.c: In function ‘print_sockaddr’:
linux-user/strace.c:370:17: warning: declaration of ‘i’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
370 | int i;
| ^
linux-user/strace.c:361:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
361 | int i;
| ^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-20-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
util/vhost-user-server.c: In function ‘set_watch’:
util/vhost-user-server.c:274:20: warning: declaration of ‘vu_fd_watch’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
274 | VuFdWatch *vu_fd_watch = g_new0(VuFdWatch, 1);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
util/vhost-user-server.c:271:16: note: shadowed declaration is here
271 | VuFdWatch *vu_fd_watch = find_vu_fd_watch(server, fd);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-18-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
In file included from crypto/cipher.c:140:
crypto/cipher-gnutls.c.inc: In function ‘qcrypto_gnutls_cipher_encrypt’:
crypto/cipher-gnutls.c.inc:116:17: warning: declaration of ‘err’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
116 | int err = gnutls_cipher_init(&handle, ctx->galg, &gkey, NULL);
| ^~~
crypto/cipher-gnutls.c.inc:94:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
94 | int err;
| ^~~
---
crypto/cipher-gnutls.c.inc: In function ‘qcrypto_gnutls_cipher_decrypt’:
crypto/cipher-gnutls.c.inc:177:17: warning: declaration of ‘err’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
177 | int err = gnutls_cipher_init(&handle, ctx->galg, &gkey, NULL);
| ^~~
crypto/cipher-gnutls.c.inc:154:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
154 | int err;
| ^~~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-17-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
hw/nios2/10m50_devboard.c: In function ‘nios2_10m50_ghrd_init’:
hw/nios2/10m50_devboard.c:101:22: warning: declaration of ‘dev’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
101 | DeviceState *dev = qdev_new(TYPE_NIOS2_VIC);
| ^~~
hw/nios2/10m50_devboard.c:60:18: note: shadowed declaration is here
60 | DeviceState *dev;
| ^~~
hw/nios2/10m50_devboard.c:110:18: warning: declaration of ‘i’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
110 | for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
| ^
hw/nios2/10m50_devboard.c:67:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
67 | int i;
| ^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-15-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
hw/m68k/virt.c:263:13: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
BOOTINFOSTR(param_ptr, BI_COMMAND_LINE,
^
hw/m68k/bootinfo.h:47:13: note: expanded from macro 'BOOTINFOSTR'
int i; \
^
hw/m68k/virt.c:130:9: note: previous declaration is here
int i;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-13-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
hw/arm/allwinner-r40.c:412:14: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
for (int i = 0; i < AW_R40_NUM_MMCS; i++) {
^
hw/arm/allwinner-r40.c:299:14: note: previous declaration is here
unsigned i;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-10-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
hw/arm/virt.c:821:22: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
qemu_irq irq = qdev_get_gpio_in(vms->gic,
^
hw/arm/virt.c:803:13: note: previous declaration is here
int irq;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-9-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
target/mips/tcg/nanomips_translate.c.inc:4410:33: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
int32_t imm = extract32(ctx->opcode, 1, 13) |
^
target/mips/tcg/nanomips_translate.c.inc:3577:9: note: previous declaration is here
int imm;
^
target/mips/tcg/translate.c:15578:19: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
for (unsigned i = 1; i < 32; i++) {
^
target/mips/tcg/translate.c:15567:9: note: previous declaration is here
int i;
^
target/mips/tcg/msa_helper.c:7478:13: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
MSA_FLOAT_MAXOP(pwx->w[0], min, pws->w[0], pws->w[0], 32);
^
target/mips/tcg/msa_helper.c:7434:23: note: expanded from macro 'MSA_FLOAT_MAXOP'
float_status *status = &env->active_tc.msa_fp_status;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-5-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Per Peter Maydell analysis [*]:
The hvf_vcpu_exec() function is not documented, but in practice
its caller expects it to return either EXCP_DEBUG (for "this was
a guest debug exception you need to deal with") or something else
(presumably the intention being 0 for OK).
The hvf_sysreg_read() and hvf_sysreg_write() functions are also not
documented, but they return 0 on success, or 1 for a completely
unrecognized sysreg where we've raised the UNDEF exception (but
not if we raised an UNDEF exception for an unrecognized GIC sysreg --
I think this is a bug). We use this return value to decide whether
we need to advance the PC past the insn or not. It's not the same
as the return value we want to return from hvf_vcpu_exec().
Retain the variable as locally scoped but give it a name that
doesn't clash with the other function-scoped variable.
This fixes:
target/arm/hvf/hvf.c:1936:13: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
int ret = 0;
^
target/arm/hvf/hvf.c:1807:9: note: previous declaration is here
int ret;
^
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAFEAcA_e+fU6JKtS+W63wr9cCJ6btu_hT_ydZWOwC0kBkDYYYQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-4-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
tcg/tcg.c:2551:27: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
MemOp op = get_memop(oi);
^
tcg/tcg.c:2437:12: note: previous declaration is here
TCGOp *op;
^
accel/tcg/tb-maint.c:245:18: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
for (int i = 0; i < V_L2_SIZE; i++) {
^
accel/tcg/tb-maint.c:210:9: note: previous declaration is here
int i;
^
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-2-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Variables declared in macros can shadow other variables. Much of the
time, this is harmless, e.g.:
#define _FDT(exp) \
do { \
int ret = (exp); \
if (ret < 0) { \
error_report("error creating device tree: %s: %s", \
#exp, fdt_strerror(ret)); \
exit(1); \
} \
} while (0)
Harmless shadowing in h_client_architecture_support():
target_ulong ret;
[...]
ret = do_client_architecture_support(cpu, spapr, vec, fdt_bufsize);
if (ret == H_SUCCESS) {
_FDT((fdt_pack(spapr->fdt_blob)));
[...]
}
return ret;
However, we can get in trouble when the shadowed variable is used in a
macro argument:
#define QOBJECT(obj) ({ \
typeof(obj) o = (obj); \
o ? container_of(&(o)->base, QObject, base) : NULL; \
})
QOBJECT(o) expands into
({
---> typeof(o) o = (o);
o ? container_of(&(o)->base, QObject, base) : NULL;
})
Unintended variable name capture at --->. We'd be saved by
-Winit-self. But I could certainly construct more elaborate death
traps that don't trigger it.
To reduce the risk of trapping ourselves, we use variable names in
macros that no sane person would use elsewhere. Here's our actual
definition of QOBJECT():
#define QOBJECT(obj) ({ \
typeof(obj) _obj = (obj); \
_obj ? container_of(&(_obj)->base, QObject, base) : NULL; \
})
Works well enough until we nest macro calls. For instance, with
#define qobject_ref(obj) ({ \
typeof(obj) _obj = (obj); \
qobject_ref_impl(QOBJECT(_obj)); \
_obj; \
})
the expression qobject_ref(obj) expands into
({
typeof(obj) _obj = (obj);
qobject_ref_impl(
({
---> typeof(_obj) _obj = (_obj);
_obj ? container_of(&(_obj)->base, QObject, base) : NULL;
}));
_obj;
})
Unintended variable name capture at --->.
The only reliable way to prevent unintended variable name capture is
-Wshadow.
One blocker for enabling it is shadowing hiding in function-like
macros like
qdict_put(dict, "name", qobject_ref(...))
qdict_put() wraps its last argument in QOBJECT(), and the last
argument here contains another QOBJECT().
Use dark preprocessor sorcery to make the macros that give us this
problem use different variable names on every call.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230921121312.1301864-8-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the
code needlessly hard to understand. Tracked down with -Wshadow=local.
Clean up: delete inner declarations when they are actually redundant,
else rename variables.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230921121312.1301864-7-armbru@redhat.com>
Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the
code needlessly hard to understand. Tracked down with -Wshadow=local.
Clean up: delete inner declarations when they are actually redundant,
else rename variables.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230921121312.1301864-6-armbru@redhat.com>
Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the
code needlessly hard to understand. Tracked down with -Wshadow=local.
Clean up: rename both the pair of parameters and the pair of local
variables. While there, move the local variables to function scope.
Suggested-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230921121312.1301864-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the
code needlessly hard to understand. Tracked down with -Wshadow=local.
Clean up: delete inner declarations when they are actually redundant,
else rename variables.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230921121312.1301864-4-armbru@redhat.com>
Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the
code needlessly hard to understand. Tracked down with -Wshadow=local.
Clean up: delete inner declarations when they are actually redundant,
else rename variables.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <20230921121312.1301864-3-armbru@redhat.com>
qemu_rdma_save_page() reports polling error with error_report(), then
succeeds anyway. This is because the variable holding the polling
status *shadows* the variable the function returns. The latter
remains zero.
Broken since day one, and duplicated more recently.
Fixes: 2da776db48 (rdma: core logic)
Fixes: b390afd8c5 (migration/rdma: Fix out of order wrid)
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <20230921121312.1301864-2-armbru@redhat.com>
