Fix typos, and make the example work out of the box.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201217071450.701909-1-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
The 'ch' will be NULL in the following stack:
send_notify_iov()->fuse_send_msg()->virtio_send_msg(), and
this may lead to NULL pointer dereferenced in virtio_send_msg().
But send_notify_iov() was never called, so remove the useless code
about send_notify_iov() to fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20201214121615.29967-1-alex.chen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Miklos confirms it's *only* the FUSE_FORGET request that the client can
use for decrementing "lo_inode.nlookup".
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1222f01555
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201208073936.8629-1-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Currently lo_flush() is written in such a way that it expects to receive
a FLUSH requests on a regular file (and not directories). For example,
we call lo_fi_fd() which searches lo->fd_map. If we open directories
using opendir(), we keep don't keep track of these in lo->fd_map instead
we keep them in lo->dir_map. So we expect lo_flush() to be called on
regular files only.
Even linux fuse client calls FLUSH only for regular files and not
directories. So put a check for filetype and return EBADF if
lo_flush() is called on a non-regular file.
Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201211142544.GB3285@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
If remote posix locks are not enabled (lo->posix_lock == false), then disable
code paths taken to initialize inode->posix_lock hash table and corresponding
destruction and search etc.
lo_getlk() and lo_setlk() have been modified to return ENOSYS if daemon
does not support posix lock but client still sends a lock/unlock request.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201207183021.22752-3-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
We setup per inode hash table ->posix_lock to support remote posix locks.
But we forgot to initialize this table for root inode.
Laszlo managed to trigger an issue where he sent a FUSE_FLUSH request for
root inode and lo_flush() found inode with inode->posix_lock NULL and
accessing this table crashed virtiofsd.
May be we can get rid of initializing this hash table for directory
objects completely. But that optimization is for another day.
Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201207195539.GB3107@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
The current timestamp format doesn't help me visually notice small jumps
in time ("small" as defined on human scale, such as a few seconds or a few
ten seconds). Replace it with a local time format where such differences
stand out.
Before:
> [13316826770337] [ID: 00000004] unique: 62, opcode: RELEASEDIR (29), nodeid: 1, insize: 64, pid: 1
> [13316826778175] [ID: 00000004] unique: 62, success, outsize: 16
> [13316826781156] [ID: 00000004] virtio_send_msg: elem 0: with 1 in desc of length 16
> [15138279317927] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Got VU event
> [15138279504884] [ID: 00000001] fv_queue_set_started: qidx=1 started=0
> [15138279519034] [ID: 00000003] fv_queue_thread: kill event on queue 1 - quitting
> [15138280876463] [ID: 00000001] fv_remove_watch: TODO! fd=9
> [15138280897381] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Waiting for VU event
> [15138280946834] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Got VU event
> [15138281175421] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Waiting for VU event
> [15138281182387] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Got VU event
> [15138281189474] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Waiting for VU event
> [15138309321936] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Unexpected poll revents 11
> [15138309434150] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Exit
(Notice how you don't (easily) notice the gap in time after
"virtio_send_msg", and especially the amount of time passed is hard to
estimate.)
After:
> [2020-12-08 06:43:22.58+0100] [ID: 00000004] unique: 51, opcode: RELEASEDIR (29), nodeid: 1, insize: 64, pid: 1
> [2020-12-08 06:43:22.58+0100] [ID: 00000004] unique: 51, success, outsize: 16
> [2020-12-08 06:43:22.58+0100] [ID: 00000004] virtio_send_msg: elem 0: with 1 in desc of length 16
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Got VU event
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000001] fv_queue_set_started: qidx=1 started=0
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000003] fv_queue_thread: kill event on queue 1 - quitting
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000001] fv_remove_watch: TODO! fd=9
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Waiting for VU event
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Got VU event
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Waiting for VU event
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Got VU event
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.34+0100] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Waiting for VU event
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.37+0100] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Unexpected poll revents 11
> [2020-12-08 06:43:29.37+0100] [ID: 00000001] virtio_loop: Exit
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201208055043.31548-1-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Right now we create a thread pool and main thread hands over the request
to thread in thread pool to process. Number of threads in thread pool
can be managed by option --thread-pool-size.
In tests we have noted that many of the workloads are getting better
performance if we don't use a thread pool at all and process all
the requests in the context of a thread receiving the request.
Hence give user an option to be able to run virtiofsd without using
a thread pool.
To implement this, I have used existing option --thread-pool-size. This
option defines how many maximum threads can be in the thread pool.
Thread pool size zero freezes thead pool. I can't see why will one
start virtiofsd with a frozen thread pool (hence frozen file system).
So I am redefining --thread-pool-size=0 to mean, don't use a thread pool.
Instead process the request in the context of thread receiving request
from the queue.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201109143548.GA1479853@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
We have four HMP commands which have a single-character abbreviated
version: cont ('c'), quit ('q'), print ('p') and help ('h'). For
cont, quit and print, we list the abbreviation first in the help
documentation and the command name. This has the odd effect that in
the full 'help' command list these commands end up sorted out of
alphabetical order (they end up after all the other commands that
start with the same letter). As it happens, the only place this
currently changes the order is for 'cont'.
Abbreviation first is also not a very logical order, and it doesn't
match what we use for 'help' (which is 'help|?'). Put the full
command name first in both the help text and the .name field for
cont, quit and print.
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1614609
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201121151711.20783-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Delete '#' and use '0x' prefix instead
Signed-off-by: Yutao Ai <aiyutao@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20201125014514.55562-4-aiyutao@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Fix the errors by add {}
Signed-off-by: Yutao Ai <aiyutao@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20201125014514.55562-3-aiyutao@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Move the open brace '{' following struct go on the same line
Signed-off-by: Yutao Ai <aiyutao@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20201125014514.55562-2-aiyutao@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Coverity always complains about switch-case statements that fall through
the next one when there is no comment in between - which could indicate
a forgotten "break" statement. Instead of handling these issues after
they have been committed, it would be better to avoid them in the build
process already. Thus let's enable the -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning now.
The "=2" level seems to be a good compromise between being too strict and
too generic about the possible comments, so we'll start with "=2" for now.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-13-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Add missing 'break' to fix:
hw/rtc/twl92230.c: In function ‘menelaus_write’:
hw/rtc/twl92230.c:713:5: error: label at end of compound statement
713 | default:
| ^~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211154605.511714-1-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, the compiler complains
about a missing fallthrough annotation in this file. Looking at the code,
the fallthrough is indeed wanted here, so let's add a proper comment.
Message-Id: <20201217154138.1547274-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The softfloat tests are external repositories, so we do not care
about implicit fallthrough warnings in this code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-12-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To be able to compile this file with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough,
we need to add some fallthrough annotations to the case statements
that might fall through. Unfortunately, the typical "/* fallthrough */"
comments do not work here as expected since some case labels are
wrapped in macros and the compiler fails to match the comments in
this case. But using __attribute__((fallthrough)) seems to work fine,
so let's use that instead (by introducing a new QEMU_FALLTHROUGH
macro in our compiler.h header file).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-11-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/sparc/win_helper.c: In function ‘get_gregset’:
target/sparc/win_helper.c:304:9: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
304 | trace_win_helper_gregset_error(pstate);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
target/sparc/win_helper.c:306:5: note: here
306 | case 0:
| ^~~~
Add the corresponding "fall through" comment to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-10-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/sparc/translate.c: In function ‘gen_st_asi’:
target/sparc/translate.c:2320:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
2320 | if (!(dc->def->features & CPU_FEATURE_HYPV)) {
| ^
target/sparc/translate.c:2329:5: note: here
2329 | case GET_ASI_DIRECT:
| ^~~~
The "fall through" statement place is not correctly identified by the compiler.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-9-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c: In function ‘handle_cpu_signal’:
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c:169:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
169 | cpu_exit_tb_from_sighandler(cpu, old_set);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c:172:9: note: here
172 | default:
Mark the cpu_exit_tb_from_sighandler() function with QEMU_NORETURN to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-8-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arm_gicv3_put’:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:484:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP0R_EL1(1), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:485:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:495:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP1R_EL1(2), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:496:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:498:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP1R_EL1(1), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:499:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arm_gicv3_get’:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:634:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][2] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:635:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:637:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][1] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:638:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:648:39: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][2] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:649:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:651:39: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][1] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:652:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-7-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The current "#ifdef TARGET_X86_64" statement affects
the compiler's determination of fall through.
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/i386/translate.c: In function ‘gen_shiftd_rm_T1’:
target/i386/translate.c:1773:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (is_right) {
^
target/i386/translate.c:1782:5: note: here
case MO_32:
^~~~
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-6-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c: In function ‘tmr_read’:
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c:221:19: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
221 | } else if (ch == 0) {i
| ^
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c:224:5: note: here
224 | case A_TCORB:
| ^~~~
Add the corresponding "fall through" comment to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-5-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, gcc complains about
missing fallthrough annotations in this file. Looking at the code,
the fallthrough is indeed wanted here, but instead of adding the
annotations, it can be done more efficiently by simply calculating
the offset with a subtraction instead of increasing a local variable
one by one.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-4-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Looking at the way the code is formatted here (there is an empty line
after break statements, but none where the break is missing), and the
instruction set overview at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicore the
fallthrough is very likely intended here. So add a fallthrough comment
to make the it compilable with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-3-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
For compiling with -Wimplicit-fallthrough we need to fix the
fallthrough annotations in the libvixl code. This is based on
the following upstream vixl commit by Martyn Capewell:
https://git.linaro.org/arm/vixl.git/commit/?id=de326f850f736c3a337
"GCC 7 enables switch/case fallthrough checking, but this fails in
VIXL, because the annotation we use is Clang specific.
Also, fix a missing annotation in the disassembler."
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Instead of using string compares to determine if a RISC-V machine is
using 32-bit or 64-bit CPUs we can use the initalised CPUs. This avoids
us having to maintain a list of CPU names to compare against.
This commit also fixes the name of the function to match the
riscv_cpu_is_32bit() function.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 8ab7614e5df93ab5267788b73dcd75f9f5615e82.1608142916.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
Currently the riscv_is_32_bit() function only supports the generic rv32
CPUs. Extend the function to support the SiFive and LowRISC CPUs as
well.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Message-id: 9a13764115ba78688ba61b56526c6de65fc3ef42.1608142916.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
Previously if an interrupt occured during the claim process (after the
interrupt is claimed but before it's completed) it would never be
cleared.
This patch ensures that we also clear the hidden_pending bits as well.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Jackie Ke <jackieke724@hotmail.com>
Message-id: 4e9786084a86f220689123cc8a7837af8fa071cf.1607100423.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
The TW and TSR fields should be bits 21 and 22 and not 30/29.
This was found while comparing QEMU behaviour against the sail formal
model (https://github.com/rems-project/sail-riscv/).
Signed-off-by: Alex Richardson <Alexander.Richardson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201130170117.71281-1-Alexander.Richardson@cl.cam.ac.uk
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We found that the hypervisor virtual-machine load and store instructions,
included HLVX/HLV/HSV, couldn't access guest userspace memory.
In the riscv-privileged spec, HLVX/HLV/HSV is defined as follow:
"As usual when V=1, two-stage address translation is applied, and
the HS-level sstatus.SUM is ignored."
But get_physical_address() doesn't ignore sstatus.SUM, when HLVX/HLV/HSV
accesses guest userspace memory. So this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <jiangyifei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201130012810.899-1-jiangyifei@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Fix code style. Don't use '#' flag of printf format ('%#') in
format strings, use '0x' prefix instead
Signed-off-by: Xinhao Zhang <zhangxinhao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Deng <dengkai1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201116140148.2850128-1-zhangxinhao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The sifive_u machine emulates two UARTs but we have only UART0 DT
node in the generated DTB so this patch adds UART1 DT node in the
generated DTB.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201111094725.3768755-1-anup.patel@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
