It can't fail, and now that it returns a uint8_t a 0xff mask
is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
It is never supposed to fail and cannot return an error, so just
have it return the proper type. Have it return 0xff on nothing
available, since that's what would happen on a real bus.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
smbus.c and smbus.h had device side code, master side code, and
smbus.h has some smbus_eeprom.c definitions. Split them into
separate files.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
The region 0x40010000 .. 0x4001ffff and its secure-only alias
at 0x50010000... are for per-CPU devices. We implement this by
giving each CPU its own container memory region, where the
per-CPU devices live. Unfortunately, the alias region which
makes devices mapped at 0x4... addresses also appear at 0x5...
is only implemented in the overall "all CPUs" container. The
effect of this bug is that the CPU_IDENTITY register block appears
only at 0x4001f000, but not at the 0x5001f000 alias where it should
also appear. Guests (like very recent Arm Trusted Firmware-M)
which try to access it at 0x5001f000 will crash.
Fix this by moving the handling for this alias from the "all CPUs"
container to the per-CPU container. (We leave the aliases for
0x1... and 0x3... in the overall container, because there are
no per-CPU devices there.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190215180500.6906-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Wire up the two PL011 UARTs in the Musca board.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Wire up the PL031 RTC for the Musca board.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The Musca board puts its SRAM and flash behind TrustZone
Memory Protection Controllers (MPCs). Each MPC sits between
the CPU and the RAM/flash, and also has a set of memory mapped
control registers. Wire up the MPCs, and the memory behind them.
For the moment we implement the flash as simple ROM, which
cannot be reprogrammed by the guest.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Many of the devices on the Musca board live behind TrustZone
Peripheral Protection Controllers (PPCs); add models of the
PPCs, using a similar scheme to the MPS2 board models.
This commit wires up the PPCs with "unimplemented device"
stubs behind them in the correct places in the address map.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The Musca-A and Musca-B1 development boards are based on the
SSE-200 subsystem for embedded. Implement an initial skeleton
model of these boards, which are similar but not identical.
This commit creates the board model with the SSE and the IRQ
splitters to wire IRQs up to its two CPUs. As yet there
are no devices and no memory: these will be added later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The Musca boards have DAPLink firmware that sets the initial
secure VTOR value (the location of the vector table) differently
depending on the boot mode (from flash, from RAM, etc). Export
the init-svtor as a QOM property of the ARMSSE object so that
the board can change it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Coverity points out (CID 1398632, CID 1398650) that we
leak a couple of allocated strings in the error-exit
code path for setting up the MHUs in the ARMSSE.
Fix this bug by moving the allocate-and-free of each
string to be closer to the use, so we do the free before
doing the error-exit check.
Fixes: f8574705f6 ("hw/arm/armsse: Add unimplemented-device stubs for MHUs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190215113707.24553-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In commit 91c1e9fcbd where we added dual-CPU support to
the ARMSSE, we set up the wiring of the expansion IRQs via nested
loops: the outer loop on 'i' loops for each CPU, and the inner loop
on 'j' loops for each interrupt. Fix a typo which meant we were
wiring every expansion IRQ line to external IRQ 0 on CPU 0 and
to external IRQ 1 on CPU 1.
Fixes: 91c1e9fcbd ("hw/arm/armsse: Support dual-CPU configuration")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
This will be needed by vhost-user-test, when each test switches to
its own GMainLoop and GMainContext. Otherwise, for a reconnecting
socket the initial connection will happen on the default GMainContext,
and no one will be listening on it.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190202110834.24880-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The arm_boot_info struct has a skip_dtb_autoload flag: if this is
set to true by the board code then arm_load_kernel() will not
load the DTB itself, but will leave this for the board code to
do itself later. However, the check for this is done in a
code path which is only executed for the case where we load
a kernel image file. If we're taking the "boot via firmware"
code path then the flag isn't honoured and the DTB is never
loaded.
We didn't notice this because the only real user of "boot
via firmware" that cares about the DTB is the virt board
(for UEFI boot), and that always wants skip_dtb_autoload
anyway. But the SBSA reference board model we're planning to
add will want the flag to behave correctly.
Now we've refactored the arm_load_kernel() function, the
fix is simple: drop the early 'return' so we fall into
the same "load the DTB" code the boot-direct-kernel path uses.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190131112240.8395-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The code path for booting firmware doesn't set env->boot_info. At
first sight this looks odd, so add a comment saying why we don't.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190131112240.8395-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Factor out the "boot via firmware" code path from arm_load_kernel()
into its own function.
This commit only moves code around; no semantic changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190131112240.8395-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Factor out the "direct kernel boot" code path from arm_load_kernel()
into its own function; this function is getting long enough that
the code flow is a bit confusing.
This commit only moves code around; no semantic changes.
We leave the "load the dtb" code in arm_load_kernel() -- this
is currently only used by the "direct kernel boot" path, but
this is a bug which we will fix shortly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190131112240.8395-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Fix the block comment style in arm_load_kernel() to QEMU's
current style preferences. This will allow us to do some
refactoring of this function without checkpatch complaining
about the code-motion patches.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190131112240.8395-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make ARM virt code configurable and the new CONFIG_ARM_VIRT
definitions added to the default-configs/arm-softmmu.mak.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190202072456.6468-8-yang.zhong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This patch adds an optional function pointer, 'elf_note_fn', to
load_elf() which causes load_elf() to additionally parse any
ELF program headers of type PT_NOTE and check to see if the ELF
Note is of the type specified by the 'translate_opaque' arg.
If a matching ELF Note is found then the specfied function pointer
is called to process the ELF note.
Passing a NULL function pointer results in ELF Notes being skipped.
The first consumer of this functionality is the PVHboot support
which needs to read the XEN_ELFNOTE_PHYS32_ENTRY ELF Note while
loading the uncompressed kernel binary in order to discover the
boot entry address for the x86/HVM direct boot ABI.
Signed-off-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Until now, the set_pc logic was unclear, which raised questions about
whether it should be used directly, applying a value to PC or adding
additional checks, for example, set the Thumb bit in Arm cpu. Let's set
the set_pc logic for “Configure the PC, as was done in the ELF file”
and implement synchronize_with_tb hook for preserving PC to cpu_tb_exec.
Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190129121817.7109-1-jusual@mail.ru
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add a model of the MPS2 FPGA image described in Application Note
AN521. This is identical to the AN505 image, except that it uses
the SSE-200 rather than the IoTKit and so has two Cortex-M33 CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-24-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In preparation for adding support for the AN521 MPS2 image, we need
to handle wiring up the MPS2 device interrupt lines to both CPUs in
the SSE-200, rather than just the one that the IoTKit has.
Abstract out a "connect to the IoTKit interrupt line" function
and make it connect to a splitter which feeds both sets of inputs
for the SSE-200 case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-23-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add a model of the SSE-200, now we have put in all
the code that lets us make it different from the IoTKit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-22-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Instantiate a copy of the CPU_IDENTITY register block for each CPU
in an SSE-200.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-21-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has a "CPU local security control" register bank; add an
unimplemented-device stub for it. (The register bank has only one
interesting register, which allows the guest to lock down changes
to various CPU registers so they cannot be modified further. We
don't support that in our Cortex-M33 model anyway.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 gives each CPU a register bank to use to control its
L1 instruction cache. Put in an unimplemented-device stub for this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add unimplemented-device stubs for the various Power Policy Unit
devices that the SSE-200 has.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has two Message Handling Units (MHUs), which sit behind
the APB PPC0. Wire up some unimplemented-device stubs for these,
since we don't yet implement a real model of this device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SYS_VERSION and SYS_CONFIG register values differ between the
IoTKit and SSE-200. Make them configurable via QOM properties rather
than hard-coded, and set them appropriately in the ARMSSE code that
instantiates the IOTKIT_SYSINFO device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Create a cluster object to hold each CPU in the SSE. They are
logically distinct and may be configured differently (for instance
one may not have an FPU where the other does).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Give each CPU its own container memory region. This is necessary
for two reasons:
* some devices are instantiated one per CPU and the CPU sees only
its own device
* since a memory region can only be put into one container, we must
give each armv7m object a different MemoryRegion as its 'memory'
property, or a dual-CPU configuration will assert on realize when
the second armv7m object tries to put the MR into a container when
it is already in the first armv7m object's container
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has two Cortex-M33 CPUs. These see the same view
of memory, with the exception of the "private CPU region" which
has per-CPU devices. Internal device interrupts for SSE-200
devices are mostly wired up to both CPUs, with the exception of
a few per-CPU devices. External GPIO inputs on the SSE-200
device are provided for the second CPU's interrupts above 32,
as is already the case for the first CPU.
Refactor the code to support creation of multiple CPUs.
For the moment we leave all CPUs with the same view of
memory: this will not work in the multiple-CPU case, but
we will fix this in the following commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For the IoTKit the SRAM bank size is always 32K (15 bits); for the
SSE-200 this is a configurable parameter, which defaults to 32K but
can be changed when it is built into a particular SoC. For instance
the Musca-B1 board sets it to 128K (17 bits).
Make the bank size a QOM property. We follow the SSE-200 hardware in
naming the parameter SRAM_ADDR_WIDTH, which specifies the number of
address bits of a single SRAM bank.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has four banks of SRAM, each with its own
Memory Protection Controller, where the IoTKit has only one.
Make the number of SRAM banks a field in ARMSSEInfo.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has 4 banks of SRAM, each with its own internal
Memory Protection Controller. The interrupt status for these
extra MPCs appears in the same security controller SECMPCINTSTATUS
register as the MPC for the IoTKit's single SRAM bank. Enhance the
iotkit-secctl device to allow 4 MPCs. (If the particular IoTKit/SSE
variant in use does not have all 4 MPCs then the unused inputs will
simply result in the SECMPCINTSTATUS bits being zero as required.)
The hardcoded constant "1"s in armsse.c indicate the actual number
of SRAM MPCs the IoTKit has, and will be replaced in the following
commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Rename the files that used to be iotkit.[ch] to
armsse.[ch] to reflect the fact they new cover
multiple Arm subsystems for embedded.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Rename various internal uses of 'iotkit' in hw/arm/iotkit.c to
'armsse', for consistency. The remaining occurences are:
* related to the devices TYPE_IOTKIT_SYSCTL, TYPE_IOTKIT_SYSINFO,
etc, which this refactor is not touching
* references that apply specifically to the IoTKit (like
the lack of a private CPU region)
* the vmstate, which keeps its old "iotkit" name for
migration compatibility reasons
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Arm SSE-200 Subsystem for Embedded is a revised and
extended version of the older IoTKit SoC. Prepare for
adding a model of it by refactoring the IoTKit code into
an abstract base class which contains the functionality,
driven by a class data block specific to each subclass.
(This is the same approach used by the existing bcm283x
SoC family implementation.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Arm IoTKit was effectively the forerunner of a series of
subsystems for embedded SoCs, named the SSE-050, SSE-100 and SSE-200:
https://developer.arm.com/products/system-design/subsystems
These are generally quite similar, though later iterations have
extra devices that earlier ones do not.
We want to add a model of the SSE-200, which means refactoring the
IoTKit code into an abstract base class and subclasses (using the
same design that the bcm283x SoC and Aspeed SoC family
implementations do). As a first step, rename the IoTKit struct and
QOM macros to ARMSSE, which is what we're going to name the base
class. We temporarily retain TYPE_IOTKIT to avoid changing the
code that instantiates a TYPE_IOTKIT device here and then changing
it back again when it is re-introduced as a subclass.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Expose "start-powered-off" as a property of the ARMv7M container,
which we just pass through to the CPU object in the same way that we
do for "init-svtor" and "idau". (We want this for the SSE-200, which
powers up only the first CPU at reset and leaves the second powered
down.)
As with the other CPU properties here, we can't just use alias
properties, because the CPU QOM object is not created until armv7m
realize time.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Rather than just creating the CPUs with object_new, make them child
objects of the armv7m container. This will allow the cluster code to
find the CPUs if an armv7m object is made a child of a cluster object.
object_new_with_props() will do the parenting for us.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently the ARMv7M NVIC object's realize method assumes that the
CPU the NVIC is attached to is CPU 0, because it thinks there can
only ever be one CPU in the system. To allow a dual-Cortex-M33
setup we need to remove this assumption; instead the armv7m
wrapper object tells the NVIC its CPU, in the same way that it
already tells the CPU what the NVIC is.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
set object owner in memory_region_init_ram() instead
of NULL.
Signed-off-by: kumar sourav <sourav.jb1988@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190125155630.17430-1-sourav.jb1988@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Currently the cluster implementation doesn't have any constraints
on the ordering of realizing the TYPE_CPU_CLUSTER and populating it
with child objects. We want to impose a constraint that realize
must happen only after all the child objects are added, so move
the realize of rpu_cluster. (The apu_cluster is already
realized after child population.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 20190121152218.9592-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
If we aren't going to create any RPUs, then don't create the
rpu-cluster unit. This allows us to add an assertion to the
cluster object that it contains at least one CPU, which helps
to avoid bugs in creating clusters and putting CPUs in them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190121184314.14311-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Recent microbit firmwares panic if the TWI magnetometer/accelerometer
devices are not detected during startup. We don't implement TWI (I2C)
so let's stub out these devices just to let the firmware boot.
Signed-off by: Steffen Görtz <contrib@steffen-goertz.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190110094020.18354-2-stefanha@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: fixed comment style]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Let's report IO-coherent access is supported for translation
table walks, descriptor fetches and queues by setting the COHACC
override flag. Without that, we observe wrong command opcodes.
The DT description also advertises the dma coherency.
Fixes a703b4f6c1 ("hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add smmuv3 node in IORT table")
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190107101041.765-1-eric.auger@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
