Roberto Ierusalimschy 7f5c31cdca Fixed bug in 'string.format' with option '%f'
As an example, 'print(string.format("%.99f", 1e70))' may have a
lot of garbage after the number.

The old test to ensure that 'string.format("%.99f", n)' was not too
large, 'fabs(n) < 1e100', assumes that the number will fit in the 99
bytes; but the 99 is not the space for the number, it is the added
extra zeros.  The option worked for smaller numbers because of the
extra space added to MAX_ITEM.
2019-07-23 12:46:33 -03:00
all
2019-07-05 15:03:15 -03:00
2019-04-24 14:41:41 -03:00
2019-06-04 11:22:21 -03:00
2019-07-17 14:26:56 -03:00
2019-06-03 11:36:42 -03:00
2019-07-22 09:41:10 -03:00
2019-07-22 09:41:10 -03:00
2019-07-22 09:41:10 -03:00
2019-07-05 15:03:15 -03:00
2019-06-03 11:36:42 -03:00
2019-07-19 09:43:35 -03:00
2019-07-19 11:12:31 -03:00
2019-07-17 14:26:56 -03:00
2019-07-17 14:26:56 -03:00
2019-06-26 13:26:36 -03:00
2019-07-19 11:12:31 -03:00
2019-06-03 11:36:42 -03:00
2019-07-05 15:03:15 -03:00
2019-07-19 11:12:31 -03:00
2019-06-26 13:26:36 -03:00
2019-07-05 15:03:15 -03:00
2019-06-18 16:52:22 -03:00
2019-07-05 15:03:15 -03:00
2019-07-22 09:41:10 -03:00
2019-06-05 13:21:16 -03:00
Description
No description provided
17 MiB
Languages
C 67.4%
Lua 32%
Makefile 0.6%