Required by C11 Sec. 7.22.3.1 The aligned_alloc function, para. 2,
p. 348:
The value of alignment shall be a valid alignment supported by the
implementation and the value of size shall be an integral multiple
of alignment.
XXX pullup-10
Provide a single variable
CC_WNO_ADDRESS_OF_PACKED_MEMBER
with options for both clang and gcc, to replace
CLANG_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER
CC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER
GCC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER
Using the convention CC_compilerflag, where compilerflag
is based on the full compiler flag name.
commit 6bae6625e0e06816c80ac4971dfccf0643abe3f0
Author: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed Aug 17 14:19:59 2022 -0700
Improve handling of missing '.' and '..' in UFS directories.
The UFS filesystem expects to find '.' and '..' as the first two entries
in a directory. The kernel's UFS name cache can become quite confused
when these two entries are not present as the first two entries.
Prior to this change, when the fsck_ffs(8) utility detected that
'.' and/or '..' were missing, it would report them, but only offered
to replace them if the space at the beginning of the directory was
available. Otherwise it was left to the system administrator to
move the offending file(s) out of the way and then rerun fsck_ffs(8)
to create the '.' and '..' entries.
With this change, fsck_ffs(8) will always be able to create the '.'
and/or '..' entries. It moves any files in the way elsewhere in the
directory block. If there is no room in the directory block to which
to move them, they are placed in the lost+found directory.
Reported by: Peter Holm
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Fix the previous signed/unsigned fixes to build on 32-bit,
including applying this commit from FreeBSD:
commit 2d34afcd04207cf3fa3d5b7f467a890eae75da41
Author: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun Oct 25 21:04:07 2020 +0000
Use proper type (ino_t) for inode numbers to avoid improper sign extention
in the Pass 5 checks. The manifestation was fsck_ffs exiting with this error:
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
fsck_ffs: inoinfo: inumber 18446744071562087424 out of range
The error only manifests itself for filesystems bigger than about 100Tb.
Reported by: Nikita Grechikhin <ngrechikhin at yandex.ru>
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Netflix
Apply these commits from FreeBSD:
commit e870d1e6f97cc73308c11c40684b775bcfa906a2
Author: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed Feb 10 20:10:35 2010 +0000
This fix corrects a problem in the file system that treats large
inode numbers as negative rather than unsigned. For a default
(16K block) file system, this bug began to show up at a file system
size above about 16Tb.
To fully handle this problem, newfs must be updated to ensure that
it will never create a filesystem with more than 2^32 inodes. That
patch will be forthcoming soon.
Reported by: Scott Burns, John Kilburg, Bruce Evans
Followup by: Jeff Roberson
PR: 133980
MFC after: 2 weeks
commit 81479e688b0f643ffacd3f335b4b4bba460b769d
Author: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu Feb 11 18:14:53 2010 +0000
One last pass to get all the unsigned comparisons correct.
In additional to the changes from FreeBSD, this commit includes quite a few
related changes to appease -Wsign-compare.
disabling support in UFS2 for extended attributes (including ACLs).
Add a new variant of UFS2 called "UFS2ea" that does support extended attributes.
Add new fsck_ffs operations "-c ea" and "-c no-ea" to convert file systems
from UFS2 to UFS2ea and vice-versa (both of which delete all existing extended
attributes in the process).
Apparently fsck doesn't have a way to replay it to its internal memory
only. (Someone(TM) should implement this...)
This means that if you use -n, it can't replay the journal. But the
sequence of prints is such that it looks like it did. This is quite
misleading. Add an additional specific warning.
right now. new address-of-packed-member and format-overflow
warnings have new GCC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER amd
GCC_NO_FORMAT_OVERFLOW variables to remove these warnings.
apply to a bunch of the tree. mostly, these are real bugs that
should be fixed, but in many cases, only by removing the 'packed'
attribute from some structure that doesn't really need it. (i
looked at many different ones, and while perhaps 60-80% were
already properly aligned, it wasn't clear to me that the uses
were always coming from sane data vs network alignment, so it
doesn't seem safe to remove packed without careful research for
each affect struct.) clang already warned (and was not erroring)
for many of these cases, but gcc picked up dozens more.
returntosingle was defined in multiple places:
- fsck_lfs/main.c
- fsck_ffs/main.c
- fsck_ext2fs/main.c
- fsck/fsutil.c
Keep the fsutil.c definition as the only one.
Detected during the build of telned with Address Sanitizer (MKSANITIZER).
names (including the terminating NUL), as well as directory entries with
extra free space (d->d_reclen > UFS_DIRSIZ(d)).
Inspired from FreeBSD:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=347066
While the kernel has been fixed to deal with the padding bytes (new
kernels will correctly zero out all the padding after the name), it
appears that there is still an issue with directory entries with extra
free space, since a newly created and populated filesystem gets modified
with "fsck_ffs -z".
support for Endian-Independent FFS and Apple UFS is disabled unless FFS_EI=1
and APPLE_UFS=1 are added to CRUNCHENV, respectively.
This reduces the size of ramdisk image for atari by over 15KB.
Thanks tsutsui and christos for their useful comments.
Move the documents that are papers to /usr/share/doc/papers.
Give them suitable names (including the author and year).
The key property of papers that distinguishes them from documentation
is that they're historical: they're published at a particular time and
aren't updated or maintained. (Except cosmetically.)
We should only ship papers that are of interest to users, either for
historical perspective or because they're the original research
writeup of stuff that went into the system and is still pertinent.
The ffs papers clearly meet this standard; the other one here (about
passwords, in 1978) is probably past its sell-by date.
Update the <bsd.doc.mk> infrastructure, and update the docs to match
the new infrastructure.
- Build and install text, ps, pdf, and/or html, not roff sources.
- Don't wire the chapter numbers into the build system, or use them in
the installed pathnames. This didn't matter much when the docs were a
museum, but now that we're theoretically going to start maintaining
them again, we're going to add and remove documents periodically and
having the chapter numbers baked in creates a lot of thrashing for no
purpose.
- Specify the document name explicitly, rather than implicitly in a
path. Use this name (instead of other random strings) as the name
of the installed files.
- Specify the document section, which is the subdirectory of
/usr/share/doc to install into.
- Allow multiple subdocuments. (That is, multiple documents in one
output directory.)
- Enumerate the .png files groff emits along with html so they can be
installed.
- Remove assorted hand-rolled rules for running roff and roff widgetry
and add enough variable settings to make these unnecessary. This
includes support for
- explicit use of soelim
- refer
- tbl
- pic
- eqn
- Forcibly apply at least minimal amounts of sanity to certain
autogenerated roff files.
- Don't exclude USD.doc, SMM.doc, and PSD.doc directories from the
build, as they now actually do stuff.
Note: currently we can't generate pdf. This turns out to be a
nontrivial problem with no immediate solution forthcoming. So for now,
as a workaround, install compressed .ps as the printable form.
This would be a problem only when allocating a new data block and the
indir block is already allocated, which explains why automated tests didn't
find it.
Problem reported on tech-kern@ and fix tested by manu@.
fragstoblks()
blkstofrags()
fragnum()
blknum()
to finish the job of distinguishing them from the lfs versions, which
Christos renamed the other day.
I believe this is the last of the overtly ambiguous exported symbols
from ffs... or at least, the last of the ones that conflicted with lfs.
ffs still pollutes the C namespace very broadly (as does ufs) and this
needs quite a bit more cleanup.
XXX: boo on macros with lowercase names. But I'm not tackling that just yet.
MAXDIRSIZE -> UFS_MAXDIRSIZE or LFS_MAXDIRSIZE
NINDIR -> FFS_NINDIR, EXT2_NINDIR, LFS_NINDIR, or MFS_NINDIR
INOPB -> FFS_INOPB, LFS_INOPB
INOPF -> FFS_INOPF, LFS_INOPF
blksize -> ffs_blksize, ext2_blksize, or lfs_blksize
sblksize -> ffs_blksize
These are not the only ambiguously defined filesystem macros, of
course, there's a pile more. I may not have found all the ambiguous
definitions of blksize(), too, as there are a lot of other things
called 'blksize' in the system.
pollution. Specifically:
ROOTINO -> UFS_ROOTINO
WINO -> UFS_WINO
NXADDR -> UFS_NXADDR
NDADDR -> UFS_NDADDR
NIADDR -> UFS_NIADDR
MAXSYMLINKLEN -> UFS_MAXSYMLINKLEN
MAXSYMLINKLEN_UFS[12] -> UFS[12]_MAXSYMLINKLEN (for consistency)
Sort out ext2fs's misuse of NDADDR and NIADDR; fortunately, these have
the same values in ext2fs and ffs.
No functional change intended.
riastradh