Fix pasto in the !ufs2 case (use dp->dp1 and not of dp->dp2).

This would be a problem only when allocating a new data block and the
indir block is already allocated, which explains why automated tests didn't
find it.
Problem reported on tech-kern@ and fix tested by manu@.
This commit is contained in:
bouyer 2013-12-02 18:46:52 +00:00
parent 8b058f850e
commit 7e810dc605
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* $NetBSD: inode.c,v 1.69 2013/06/23 22:03:34 dholland Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: inode.c,v 1.70 2013/12/02 18:46:52 bouyer Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (c) 1980, 1986, 1993
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
#if 0
static char sccsid[] = "@(#)inode.c 8.8 (Berkeley) 4/28/95";
#else
__RCSID("$NetBSD: inode.c,v 1.69 2013/06/23 22:03:34 dholland Exp $");
__RCSID("$NetBSD: inode.c,v 1.70 2013/12/02 18:46:52 bouyer Exp $");
#endif
#endif /* not lint */
@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ expandfile(union dinode *dp)
dp->dp1.di_ib[ilevel - 1] = iswap32(newblk);
} else {
ibp = getdatablk(is_ufs2 ? iswap64(dp->dp2.di_ib[ilevel - 1]) :
iswap32(dp->dp2.di_ib[ilevel - 1]), sblock->fs_bsize);
iswap32(dp->dp1.di_ib[ilevel - 1]), sblock->fs_bsize);
}
/* walk indirect blocks up to the data block */
for (; ilevel >0 ; ilevel--) {