There's no need to spin up the full desktop-shell for the vast majority
of our tests. Rework them to use weston-test-desktop-shell, which is
more lightweight and sensible.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Not printing these will drop 7980 lines or roughly 350 kB from the test
logs. Now I don't have scroll through them all, and I don't have to
watch them if I run this test manually.
These prints were useful when developing the test, but we don't need
them printed in CI all the time. Printing the final count should be
enough.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>
This migrates all the client tests that have nothing special in them to the new
test harness.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>
When we move on to TAP, stdout will be reserved for TAP and stderr is for free
chatter. Set up an example that tests should use testlog() instead of fprintf
or printf to chat in the right place.
Most statements were already printing to stderr, so this just makes then a
little shorter. There are also some statements that printed to stdout and are
now corrected.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>
GCC 7 now warns on case statements falling through without an explicit
comment that falling through is OK. Insert some to make it happy.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <emilio.pozuelo@collabora.co.uk>
Following on from b8c16c995b, extend the family tree being tested by
place_above and place_below a little, ensuring that subsurfaces can't be
placed above or below surfaces which are related to them, but aren't
their immediate parent or sibling.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
The parent of a subsurface can be used as a sibling in the place_below
and place_above calls. However this did not work when the parent is
nested, so fix the sibling check and add a test to check this case.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
A more descriptive name to not be confused with create_client().
v2: Rebased: fix also devices-test.c.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Marek Chalupa <mchqwerty@gmail.com>
Mostly remove headers that aren't actually needed for anything.
Add stdint.h to permit dropping xf86drm.h, which is otherwise unneeded.
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osg.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Marek Chalupa <mchqwerty@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
There was an issue recently in screen-share.c where config.h was not
being included, resulting in the wrong definition for off_t being used on
32 bit systems. I checked and I don't think this problem is happening
elsewhere, but to help avoid this sort of problem in the future, I went
through and made sure that config.h is included first whenever system
headers are included.
The config.h header should be included before any system headers, failing
to do this can result in the wrong type sizes being defined on certain
systems, e.g. off_t from sys/types.h
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wedgbury <andrew.wedgbury@realvnc.com>
This reverts commit 2396aec684.
This exact version of the sub-surface protocol has been copied into
Wayland core. Therefore it must be removed from here to avoid build
conflicts and useless duplication.
No other changes to sub-surface protocol consumers are needed, the
identical API is now offered by libwayland-client and libwayland-server.
The commit adding sub-surfaces to Wayland is:
Author: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
protocol: add sub-surfaces to the core
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
It should not be possible to create a loop by nesting sub-surfaces.
Currently Weston fails this test.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Add a test for varying the object destruction order in a complex
sub-surface tree.
This test attemps to fuzz the destruction of a sub-surface tree to make
sure the server does not crash on any wl_surface or wl_subsurface
destruction sequence.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
For testing the protocol behaviour only:
- linking a surface to a parent does not fail
- position and placement requests do not fail
- bad linking and arguments do fail
- passing a surface as a sibling from a different set fails
- different destruction sequences do not crash
- setting a surface as its own parent fails
- nesting succeeds
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
Daniel Stone