a test program:
========
typedef struct X { int len; } X;
int main(void) {
X myX;
myX.10 = 10;
return 0;
}
========
Error message before a patch:
error: ';' expected (got "(null)")
After a patch:
error: field name expected
* Documentation is now in "docs".
* Source code is now in "src".
* Misc. fixes here and there so that everything still works.
I think I got everything in this commit, but I only tested this
on Linux (Make) and Windows (CMake), so I might've messed
something up on other platforms...
Jsut for testing. It works for me (don't break anything)
Small fixes for x86_64-gen.c in "tccpp: fix issues, add tests"
are dropped in flavor of this patch.
Pip Cet:
Okay, here's a first patch that fixes the problem (but I've found
another bug, yet unfixed, in the process), though it's not
particularly pretty code (I tried hard to keep the changes to the
minimum necessary). If we decide to actually get rid of VT_QLONG and
VT_QFLOAT (please, can we?), there are some further simplifications in
tccgen.c that might offset some of the cost of this patch.
The idea is that an integer is no longer enough to describe how an
argument is stored in registers. There are a number of possibilities
(none, integer register, two integer registers, float register, two
float registers, integer register plus float register, float register
plus integer register), and instead of enumerating them I've
introduced a RegArgs type that stores the offsets for each of our
registers (for the other architectures, it's simply an int specifying
the number of registers). If someone strongly prefers an enum, we
could do that instead, but I believe this is a place where keeping
things general is worth it, because this way it should be doable to
add SSE or AVX support.
There is one line in the patch that looks suspicious:
} else {
addr = (addr + align - 1) & -align;
param_addr = addr;
addr += size;
- sse_param_index += reg_count;
}
break;
However, this actually fixes one half of a bug we have when calling a
function with eight double arguments "interrupted" by a two-double
structure after the seventh double argument:
f(double,double,double,double,double,double,double,struct { double
x,y; },double);
In this case, the last argument should be passed in %xmm7. This patch
fixes the problem in gfunc_prolog, but not the corresponding problem
in gfunc_call, which I'll try tackling next.
just for testing. Is it needed? I'm not a MSYS citizen.
run4flat is a tcc fork by David Mertens that knows how to work with
multiple symbol tables. Excelent work. A good descriptions of the
tcc internals inside a code comments.
functionality was broken some time ago and was removed
by the "tccpp: fix issues, add tests"
fix: LINE_MACRO_OUTPUT_FORMAT_NONE in pp_line()
means: output '\n' and not "don't output at all"
In the linux kernel sources:
#ifdef __STDC__
#define SYMBOL_NAME_LABEL(X) X##:
#else
#define SYMBOL_NAME_LABEL(X) X/**/:
#endif
tcc is a STDC compiler and must handle 'X##:' case.
A new version of the MEM_DEBUG will be submitted next. This version is
not depend on the malloc_usable_size() presense in the libc and
print a places where a leaked chunks of memory was allocated.
* fix some macro expansion issues
* add some pp tests in tests/pp
* improved tcc -E output for better diff'ability
* remove -dD feature (quirky code, exotic feature,
didn't work well)
Based partially on ideas / researches from PipCet
Some issues remain with VA_ARGS macros (if used in a
rather tricky way).
Also, to keep it simple, the pp doesn't automtically
add any extra spaces to separate tokens which otherwise
would form wrong tokens if re-read from tcc -E output
(such as '+' '=') GCC does that, other compilers don't.
* cleanups
- #line 01 "file" / # 01 "file" processing
- #pragma comment(lib,"foo")
- tcc -E: forward some pragmas to output (pack, comment(lib))
- fix macro parameter list parsing mess from
a3fc543459a715d7143d
(some coffee might help, next time ;)
- introduce TOK_PPSTR - to have character constants as
written in the file (similar to TOK_PPNUM)
- allow '\' appear in macros
- new functions begin/end_macro to:
- fix switching macro levels during expansion
- allow unget_tok to unget more than one tok
- slight speedup by using bitflags in isidnum_table
Also:
- x86_64.c : fix decl after statements
- i386-gen,c : fix a vstack leak with VLA on windows
- configure/Makefile : build on windows (MSYS) was broken
- tcc_warning: fflush stderr to keep output order (win32)
Author: Philip <pipcet@gmail.com>
Our VLA code can be made a lot simpler (simple enough for
even me to understand it) by giving up on the optimization idea, which
is very tempting. There's a patch to do that attached, feel free to
test and commit it if you like. (It passes all the tests, at least
This requires moving TOK_PLCHLDR handling, but the new logic should make
things easier even if (when?) GNU comma handling is removed.
(Somewhat confusingly, GCC no longer supports GNU commas. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html for a description
of past and current GCC behaviour.)
Fix handling of escape characters, spaces, and line feeds in macros or
macro arguments that might yet be subject to # stringification.
Should this be an -f option? I think memory usage increases only very
slightly (in particular, while line feeds, stray \s, and spaces are
preserved, comments are not), so it's probably not worth it to make it
one.
Note that macro_subst now checks for stray \s which are still left in
the input stream after macro substitution, if desired.
This patch depends on the previous patch, so if you revert that, please
revert this patch, too.
See http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2015-05/msg00002.html
This adds a PARSE_FLAG_ACCEPT_STRAYS parse flag to accept stray
backslashes in the source code, and uses it for pure preprocessing.
For absolutely correct behaviour of # stringification, we need to use
this flag when parsing macro definitions and in macro arguments, as
well; this patch does not yet do so. The test case for that is something
like
#define STRINGIFY2(x) #x
#define STRINGIFY(x) STRINGIFY2(x)
STRINGIFY(\n)
which should produce "\n", not a parse error or "\\n".
See http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2015-05/msg00002.html
Perhaps a better fix would be to ensure tok is set to TOK_EOF rather
than 0 at the end of a macro stream.
This partially fixes test2 of the examples given in:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2015-05/msg00002.html
It's still failing, but at least it's not running out of memory now.
The old code had an inverted condition, so
#define a(b)## b
would be accepted while
#define a(b,c) b ## ## c
would be rejected with the confusing error message "'##' invalid at
start of macro".
