It did not support GPIO index mode for read operation.
Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220525053444.27228-4-jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
AST1030 integrates one set of Parallel GPIO Controller
with maximum 151 control pins, which are 21 groups
(A~U, exclude pin: M6 M7 Q5 Q6 Q7 R0 R1 R4 R5 R6 R7 S0 S3 S4
S5 S6 S7 ) and the group T and U are input only.
Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220525053444.27228-3-jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
I was setting gpioV4-7 to "1110" using the QOM pin property handler and
noticed that lowering gpioV7 was inadvertently lowering gpioV4-6 too.
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV4 true
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV5 true
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV6 true
(qemu) qom-get /machine/soc/gpio gpioV4
true
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV7 false
(qemu) qom-get /machine/soc/gpio gpioV4
false
An expression in aspeed_gpio_set_pin_level was using a logical NOT
operator instead of a bitwise NOT operator:
value &= !pin_mask;
The original author probably intended to make a bitwise NOT expression
"~", but mistakenly used a logical NOT operator "!" instead. Some
programming languages like Rust use "!" for both purposes.
Fixes: 4b7f956862 ("hw/gpio: Add basic Aspeed GPIO model for AST2400 and
AST2500")
Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>
Message-Id: <20220502080827.244815-1-pdel@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Not sure how that got there.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220207150409.358888-2-andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The gpio array is declared as a dense array:
qemu_irq gpios[ASPEED_GPIO_NR_PINS];
(AST2500 has 228, AST2400 has 216, AST2600 has 208)
However, this array is used like a matrix of GPIO sets
(e.g. gpio[NR_SETS][NR_PINS_PER_SET] = gpio[8][32])
size_t offset = set * GPIOS_PER_SET + gpio;
qemu_set_irq(s->gpios[offset], !!(new & mask));
This can result in an out-of-bounds access to "s->gpios" because the
gpio sets do _not_ have the same length. Some of the groups (e.g.
GPIOAB) only have 4 pins. 228 != 8 * 32 == 256.
To fix this, I converted the gpio array from dense to sparse, to that
match both the hardware layout and this existing indexing code.
Fixes: 4b7f956862 ("hw/gpio: Add basic Aspeed GPIO model for AST2400 and AST2500")
Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>
Message-Id: <20211008033501.934729-2-pdel@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Some of the pin declarations in the Aspeed GPIO module were incorrect,
probably because of confusion over which bits in the input and output
uint32_t's correspond to which groups in the label array. Since the
uint32_t literals are in big endian, it's sort of the opposite of what
would be intuitive. The least significant bit in ast2500_set_props[6]
corresponds to GPIOY0, not GPIOAB7.
GPIOxx indicates input and output capabilities, GPIxx indicates only
input, GPOxx indicates only output.
AST2500:
- Previously had GPIW0..GPIW7 and GPIX0..GPIX7, that's correct.
- Previously had GPIOY0..GPIOY3, should have been GPIOY0..GPIOY7.
- Previously had GPIOAB0..GPIOAB3 and GPIAB4..GPIAB7, should only have
been GPIOAB0..GPIOAB3.
AST2600:
- GPIOT0..GPIOT7 should have been GPIT0..GPIT7.
- GPIOU0..GPIOU7 should have been GPIU0..GPIU7.
- GPIW0..GPIW7 should have been GPIOW0..GPIOW7.
- GPIOY0..GPIOY7 and GPIOZ0...GPIOZ7 were disabled.
Fixes: 4b7f956862 ("hw/gpio: Add basic Aspeed GPIO model for AST2400 and AST2500")
Fixes: 36d737ee82 ("hw/gpio: Add in AST2600 specific implementation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20210928032456.3192603-2-pdel@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There are two GPIO controllers in the ast2600; one is 3.3V and the other
is 1.8V.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20210713065854.134634-4-joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no need to define the registers relative to the 0x800 offset
where the controller is mapped, as the device is instantiated as it's
own model at the correct memory address.
Simplify the defines and remove the offset to save future confusion.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20210713065854.134634-3-joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The macro used to calculate the maximum memory size of the MMIO region
had a mistake, causing all GPIO models to create a mapping of 0x9D8.
The intent was to have it be 0x9D8 - 0x800.
This extra size doesn't matter on ast2400 and ast2500, which have a 4KB
region set aside for the GPIO controller.
On the ast2600 the 3.3V and 1.8V GPIO controllers are 2KB apart, so the
regions would overlap. Worse was the 1.8V controller would map over the
top of the following peripheral, which happens to be the RTC.
The mmio region used by each device is a maximum of 2KB, so avoid the
calculations and hard code this as the maximum.
Fixes: 36d737ee82 ("hw/gpio: Add in AST2600 specific implementation")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-id: 20210713065854.134634-2-joel@jms.id.au
[PMM: fix autocorrect error in commit message]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Headers should be included from the 'include/' directory,
not from the root directory.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20210516205034.694788-1-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
When all we do with an Error we receive into a local variable is
propagating to somewhere else, we can just as well receive it there
right away. Convert
if (!foo(..., &err)) {
...
error_propagate(errp, err);
...
return ...
}
to
if (!foo(..., errp)) {
...
...
return ...
}
where nothing else needs @err. Coccinelle script:
@rule1 forall@
identifier fun, err, errp, lbl;
expression list args, args2;
binary operator op;
constant c1, c2;
symbol false;
@@
if (
(
- fun(args, &err, args2)
+ fun(args, errp, args2)
|
- !fun(args, &err, args2)
+ !fun(args, errp, args2)
|
- fun(args, &err, args2) op c1
+ fun(args, errp, args2) op c1
)
)
{
... when != err
when != lbl:
when strict
- error_propagate(errp, err);
... when != err
(
return;
|
return c2;
|
return false;
)
}
@rule2 forall@
identifier fun, err, errp, lbl;
expression list args, args2;
expression var;
binary operator op;
constant c1, c2;
symbol false;
@@
- var = fun(args, &err, args2);
+ var = fun(args, errp, args2);
... when != err
if (
(
var
|
!var
|
var op c1
)
)
{
... when != err
when != lbl:
when strict
- error_propagate(errp, err);
... when != err
(
return;
|
return c2;
|
return false;
|
return var;
)
}
@depends on rule1 || rule2@
identifier err;
@@
- Error *err = NULL;
... when != err
Not exactly elegant, I'm afraid.
The "when != lbl:" is necessary to avoid transforming
if (fun(args, &err)) {
goto out
}
...
out:
error_propagate(errp, err);
even though other paths to label out still need the error_propagate().
For an actual example, see sclp_realize().
Without the "when strict", Coccinelle transforms vfio_msix_setup(),
incorrectly. I don't know what exactly "when strict" does, only that
it helps here.
The match of return is narrower than what I want, but I can't figure
out how to express "return where the operand doesn't use @err". For
an example where it's too narrow, see vfio_intx_enable().
Silently fails to convert hw/arm/armsse.c, because Coccinelle gets
confused by ARMSSE being used both as typedef and function-like macro
there. Converted manually.
Line breaks tidied up manually. One nested declaration of @local_err
deleted manually. Preexisting unwanted blank line dropped in
hw/riscv/sifive_e.c.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200707160613.848843-35-armbru@redhat.com>
The previous commit enables conversion of
visit_foo(..., &err);
if (err) {
...
}
to
if (!visit_foo(..., errp)) {
...
}
for visitor functions that now return true / false on success / error.
Coccinelle script:
@@
identifier fun =~ "check_list|input_type_enum|lv_start_struct|lv_type_bool|lv_type_int64|lv_type_str|lv_type_uint64|output_type_enum|parse_type_bool|parse_type_int64|parse_type_null|parse_type_number|parse_type_size|parse_type_str|parse_type_uint64|print_type_bool|print_type_int64|print_type_null|print_type_number|print_type_size|print_type_str|print_type_uint64|qapi_clone_start_alternate|qapi_clone_start_list|qapi_clone_start_struct|qapi_clone_type_bool|qapi_clone_type_int64|qapi_clone_type_null|qapi_clone_type_number|qapi_clone_type_str|qapi_clone_type_uint64|qapi_dealloc_start_list|qapi_dealloc_start_struct|qapi_dealloc_type_anything|qapi_dealloc_type_bool|qapi_dealloc_type_int64|qapi_dealloc_type_null|qapi_dealloc_type_number|qapi_dealloc_type_str|qapi_dealloc_type_uint64|qobject_input_check_list|qobject_input_check_struct|qobject_input_start_alternate|qobject_input_start_list|qobject_input_start_struct|qobject_input_type_any|qobject_input_type_bool|qobject_input_type_bool_keyval|qobject_input_type_int64|qobject_input_type_int64_keyval|qobject_input_type_null|qobject_input_type_number|qobject_input_type_number_keyval|qobject_input_type_size_keyval|qobject_input_type_str|qobject_input_type_str_keyval|qobject_input_type_uint64|qobject_input_type_uint64_keyval|qobject_output_start_list|qobject_output_start_struct|qobject_output_type_any|qobject_output_type_bool|qobject_output_type_int64|qobject_output_type_null|qobject_output_type_number|qobject_output_type_str|qobject_output_type_uint64|start_list|visit_check_list|visit_check_struct|visit_start_alternate|visit_start_list|visit_start_struct|visit_type_.*";
expression list args;
typedef Error;
Error *err;
@@
- fun(args, &err);
- if (err)
+ if (!fun(args, &err))
{
...
}
A few line breaks tidied up manually.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20200707160613.848843-19-armbru@redhat.com>
The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with
the same name already exists. Since our property names are all
hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to
handle it is passing &error_abort.
Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which
additionally fails when the child already has a parent. Parentage is
also under program control, so this is a programming error, too.
We have a bit over 500 callers. Almost half of them pass
&error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles
errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers.
The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring
programming errors is a bad idea.
Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API.
The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a
pointer to a variable containing NULL. Passing an argument of the
latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the
first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second
call. ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(),
sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize()
are wrong that way.
When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting
users pick the argument is a bad idea.
Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead.
There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming
error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and
undocumented) "automatic arrayification". Don't drop @errp there.
Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(),
and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com>
[Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
Fix warning reported by Clang static code analyzer:
hw/gpio/aspeed_gpio.c:717:18: warning: Value stored to 'g_idx' during its initialization is never read
int set_idx, g_idx = *group_idx;
^~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~
Reported-by: Clang Static Analyzer
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200422133152.16770-8-philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Remove a direct include of assert.h -- this is already
provided by qemu/osdep.h, and it breaks our rule that the
first include must always be osdep.h.
In particular we must get the assert() macro via osdep.h
to avoid compile failures on mingw (see the comment in
osdep.h where we redefine assert() for that platform).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-id: 20200403124712.24826-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The property names of AST2600 GPIO 1.8V model are one character bigger
than the names of the other ASPEED GPIO model. Increase the string
buffer size by one and be more strict on the expected pattern of the
property name.
This fixes the QOM test of the ast2600-evb machine under :
Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000.10.44.4)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin17.7.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin
Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Fixes: 36d737ee82 ("hw/gpio: Add in AST2600 specific implementation")
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-id: 20191023130455.1347-2-clg@kaod.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The AST2600 has the same sets of 3.6v gpios as the AST2400 plus an
addtional two sets of 1.8V gpios.
Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Message-id: 20190925143248.10000-15-clg@kaod.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
GPIO pins are arranged in groups of 8 pins labeled A,B,..,Y,Z,AA,AB,AC.
(Note that the ast2400 controller only goes up to group AB).
A set has four groups (except set AC which only has one) and is
referred to by the groups it is composed of (eg ABCD,EFGH,...,YZAAAB).
Each set is accessed and controlled by a bank of 14 registers.
These registers operate on a per pin level where each bit in the register
corresponds to a pin, except for the command source registers. The command
source registers operate on a per group level where bits 24, 16, 8 and 0
correspond to each group in the set.
eg. registers for set ABCD:
|D7...D0|C7...C0|B7...B0|A7...A0| <- GPIOs
|31...24|23...16|15....8|7.....0| <- bit position
Note that there are a couple of groups that only have 4 pins.
There are two ways that this model deviates from the behaviour of the
actual controller:
(1) The only control source driving the GPIO pins in the model is the ARM
model (as there currently aren't models for the LPC or Coprocessor).
(2) None of the registers in the model are reset tolerant (needs
integration with the watchdog).
Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-id: 20190904070506.1052-2-clg@kaod.org
[clg: fixed missing header files
made use of HWADDR_PRIx to fix compilation on windows ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
