During realize() time we're activating a lot of extensions based on some
criteria, e.g.:
if (cpu->cfg.ext_zk) {
cpu->cfg.ext_zkn = true;
cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;
}
This practice resulted in at least one case where we ended up enabling
something we shouldn't: RVC enabling zca/zcd/zcf when using a CPU that
has priv_spec older than 1.12.0.
We're also not considering user choice. There's no way of doing it now
but this is about to change in the next few patches.
cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() will check for priv version mismatches before
enabling extensions. If we have a mismatch between the current priv
version and the extension we want to enable, do not enable it. In the
near future, this same function will also consider user choice when
deciding if we're going to enable/disable an extension or not.
For now let's use it to handle zca/zcd/zcf enablement if RVC is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-16-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The RISC-V KVM driver uses a CPUCFG() macro that calculates the offset
of a certain field in the struct RISCVCPUConfig. We're going to use this
macro in target/riscv/cpu.c as well in the next patches. Make it public.
Rename it to CPU_CFG_OFFSET() for more clarity while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-15-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We'll have future usage for a function where, given an offset of the
struct RISCVCPUConfig, the flag is updated to a certain val.
Change all existing callers to use edata->ext_enable_offset instead of
'edata'.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-14-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The 'any' CPU type was introduced in commit dc5bd18fa5 ("RISC-V CPU
Core Definition"), being around since the beginning. It's not an easy
CPU to use: it's undocumented and its name doesn't tell users much about
what the CPU is supposed to bring. 'git log' doesn't help us either in
knowing what was the original design of this CPU type.
The closest we have is a comment from Alistair [1] where he recalls from
memory that the 'any' CPU is supposed to behave like the newly added
'max' CPU. He also suggested that the 'any' CPU should be removed.
The default CPUs are rv32 and rv64, so removing the 'any' CPU will have
impact only on users that might have a script that uses '-cpu any'.
And those users are better off using the default CPUs or the new 'max'
CPU.
We would love to just remove the code and be done with it, but one does
not simply remove a feature in QEMU. We'll put the CPU in quarantine
first, letting users know that we have the intent of removing it in the
future.
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-07/msg02891.html
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-13-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The 'max' CPU type is used by tooling to determine what's the most
capable CPU a current QEMU version implements. Other archs such as ARM
implements this type. Let's add it to RISC-V.
What we consider "most capable CPU" in this context are related to
ratified, non-vendor extensions. This means that we want the 'max' CPU
to enable all (possible) ratified extensions by default. The reasoning
behind this design is (1) vendor extensions can conflict with each other
and we won't play favorities deciding which one is default or not and
(2) non-ratified extensions are always prone to changes, not being
stable enough to be enabled by default.
All this said, we're still not able to enable all ratified extensions
due to conflicts between them. Zfinx and all its dependencies aren't
enabled because of a conflict with RVF. zce, zcmp and zcmt are also
disabled due to RVD conflicts. When running with 64 bits we're also
disabling zcf.
MISA bits RVG, RVJ and RVV are also being set manually since they're
default disabled.
This is the resulting 'riscv,isa' DT for this new CPU:
rv64imafdcvh_zicbom_zicboz_zicsr_zifencei_zihintpause_zawrs_zfa_
zfh_zfhmin_zca_zcb_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zbs_zk_zkn_zknd_
zkne_zknh_zkr_zks_zksed_zksh_zkt_zve32f_zve64f_zve64d_
smstateen_sscofpmf_sstc_svadu_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-11-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Inside riscv_cpu_validate_v() we're always throwing a log message if the
user didn't set a vector version via 'vext_spec'.
We're going to include one case with the 'max' CPU where env->vext_ver
will be set in the cpu_init(). But that alone will not stop the "vector
version is not specified" message from appearing. The usefulness of this
log message is debatable for the generic CPUs, but for a 'max' CPU type,
where we are supposed to deliver a CPU model with all features possible,
it's strange to force users to set 'vext_spec' to get rid of this
message.
Change riscv_cpu_validate_v() to not throw this log message if
env->vext_ver is already set.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-10-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Use a helper in riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() to eliminate some of its
code repetition.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-9-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The code inside riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() became quite repetitive
after recent changes. Add a helper to hide the repetition away.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-8-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Our goal is to make riscv_cpu_extensions[] hold only ratified,
non-vendor extensions.
Create a new riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[] array for them, changing
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() and riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties()
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-7-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Create a new riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] to store the non-ratified
extensions properties. Once they are ratified we'll move them back to
riscv_cpu_extensions[].
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() and riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() are
changed to keep adding non-ratified properties to users.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-6-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() and eliminate the ARRAY_SIZE() usage when
iterating in the riscv_cpu_options[] array, making it similar to what
we already do when working with riscv_cpu_extensions[].
We also have a more sophisticated motivation behind this change. In the
future we might need to export riscv_cpu_options[] to other files, and
ARRAY_LIST() doesn't work properly in that case because the array size
isn't exposed to the header file. Here's a future sight of what we would
deal with:
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1057:5: error: nested extern declaration of 'riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties' [-Werror=nested-externs]
n file included from ../target/riscv/kvm.c:19:
home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
| ^
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
1047 | for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1059:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY'
1059 | ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
| ^
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
1047 | for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
Homogenize the present and change the future by using
DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() in riscv_cpu_options[].
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Future patches will split the existing Property arrays even further, and
the existing code in riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() will start to scale
bad with it because it's dealing with KVM constraints mixed in with TCG
constraints. We're going to pay a high price to share a couple of common
lines of code between the two.
Create a new kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() helper that will be
forked from riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() if we're running KVM. The
helper includes all properties that a KVM CPU will add. The rest of
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() body will then be relieved from having
to deal with KVM constraints.
The helper was declared in kvm_stubs.h, while being implemented in
cpu.c, to allow '--enable-debug' builds to work. The compiler won't
remove the kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() reference when
'kvm_enabled()' is false if we end up with an unused function. Even
though being a KVM only helper we can't implement it in kvm.c due to its
many dependencies inside cpu.c, so make it public in kvm_riscv.h and
keep its implementation in cpu.c for now. We'll move it to kvm.c in the
near future.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-4-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
After the introduction of riscv_cpu_options[] all properties in
riscv_cpu_extensions[] are booleans. This check is now obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We'll add a new CPU type that will enable a considerable amount of
extensions. To make it easier for us we'll do a few cleanups in our
existing riscv_cpu_extensions[] array.
Start by splitting all CPU non-boolean options from it. Create a new
riscv_cpu_options[] array for them. Add all these properties in
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() as it is already being done today.
'mmu' and 'pmp' aren't really extensions in the usual way we think about
RISC-V extensions. These are closer to CPU features/options, so move
both to riscv_cpu_options[] too. In the near future we'll need to match
all extensions with all entries in isa_edata_arr[], and so it happens
that both 'mmu' and 'pmp' do not have a riscv,isa string (thus, no priv
spec version restriction). This further emphasizes the point that these
are more a CPU option than an extension.
No functional changes made.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-2-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
GDB has XML support since 6.7 which was released in 2007.
It's time to remove support for old GDB versions without XML support.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Message-Id: <20230912224107.29669-11-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231009164104.369749-18-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
GDB has XML support since 6.7 which was released in 2007.
It's time to remove support for old GDB versions without XML support.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20230912224107.29669-10-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231009164104.369749-17-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
All implementations of gdb_arch_name() returns dynamic duplicates of
static strings. It's also unlikely that there will be an implementation
of gdb_arch_name() that returns a truly dynamic value due to the nature
of the function returning a well-known identifiers. Qualify the value
gdb_arch_name() with const and make all of its implementations return
static strings.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20230912224107.29669-8-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231009164104.369749-15-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Some subclasses overwrite gdb_core_xml_file member but others don't.
Always initialize the member in the subclasses for consistency.
This especially helps for AArch64; in a following change, the file
specified by gdb_core_xml_file is always looked up even if it's going to
be overwritten later. Looking up arm-core.xml results in an error as
it will not be embedded in the AArch64 build.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230912224107.29669-7-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231009164104.369749-14-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Finish the convertion started with commit de6cd7599b
("meson: Replace softmmu_ss -> system_ss"). If the
$target_type is 'system', then use the target_system_arch[]
source set :)
Mechanical change doing:
$ sed -i -e s/target_softmmu_arch/target_system_arch/g \
$(git grep -l target_softmmu_arch)
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-13-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Software MMU is TCG specific. Here 'softmmu' is misused
for system emulation. Anyhow, since KVM is system emulation
specific, just rename as 'i386_kvm_ss'.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-10-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Add a check in 'softmmu-uaccess.h' that the header is only
include in system emulation, and rename it as 'uaccess.h'.
Rename the API methods:
- softmmu_[un]lock_user*() -> uaccess_[un]lock_user*()
- softmmu_strlen_user() -> uaccess_strlen_user().
Update a pair of comments.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-9-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-6-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Since we *might* have user emulation with softmmu,
replace the system emulation check by !user emulation one.
(target/ was cleaned from invalid CONFIG_SOFTMMU uses at
commit cab35c73be, but these files were merged few days
after, thus missed the cleanup.)
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004082239.27251-1-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
hvf_get_supported_cpuid() is only defined for x86 targets
(in target/i386/hvf/x86_cpuid.c).
Its declaration is pointless on all other targets.
All the calls to it in target/i386/cpu.c are guarded by
a call on hvf_enabled(), so are elided when HVF is not
built in. Therefore we can remove the unnecessary function
stub.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004092510.39498-3-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The only non standard type -- CPUArchState -- is forward
declared in "qemu/typedefs.h", so no particular header is
required here.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Roman Bolshakov <roman@roolebo.dev>
Tested-by: Roman Bolshakov <roman@roolebo.dev>
Message-ID: <20231004092510.39498-2-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Remove extra 'i' variable to fix this warning :
../target/ppc/kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arch_put_registers’:
../target/ppc/kvm.c:963:13: warning: declaration of ‘i’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
963 | int i;
| ^
../target/ppc/kvm.c:906:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
906 | int i;
| ^
../target/ppc/kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arch_get_registers’:
../target/ppc/kvm.c:1265:13: warning: declaration of ‘i’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
1265 | int i;
| ^
../target/ppc/kvm.c:1212:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
1212 | int i, ret;
| ^
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20231006053526.1031252-1-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
This function is now empty, so remove it. In the case of
m68k and tricore, this empties the class instance initfn,
so remove those as well.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Allow the name 'cpu_env' to be used for something else.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Retain the separate structure to emphasize its importance.
Enforce CPUArchState always follows CPUState without padding.
Reviewed-by: Anton Johansson <anjo@rev.ng>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The omission of alignment has technically been wrong since
269bd5d8f6, where QEMU_ALIGNED was added to CPUTLBDescFast.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Inherit the size and alignment from TYPE_ARM_CPU.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
TARGET_PAGE_ENTRY_EXTRA is a macro that allows guests to specify additional
fields for caching with the full TLB entry. This macro is replaced with
a union in CPUTLBEntryFull, thus making CPUTLB target-agnostic at the
cost of slightly inflated CPUTLBEntryFull for non-arm guests.
Note, this is needed to ensure that fields in CPUTLB don't vary in
offset between various targets.
(arm is the only guest actually making use of this feature.)
Signed-off-by: Anton Johansson <anjo@rev.ng>
Message-Id: <20230912153428.17816-2-anjo@rev.ng>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
accel_cpu_realize() is a generic function working with CPUs
from any target. Rename it using '_common_' to emphasis it is
not target specific.
Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231003123026.99229-4-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The AccelCPUClass::cpu_realizefn handler is meant for target
specific code, rename it using '_target_' to emphasis it.
Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231003123026.99229-3-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
We use the '*fn' suffix for handlers, this is a public method.
Drop the suffix.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Message-Id: <20231003123026.99229-2-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the
code needlessly hard to understand. Bugs love to hide in such code.
Evidence: "[PATCH v3 1/7] migration/rdma: Fix save_page method to fail
on polling error".
This patch removes the local variable shadowing. Tested by adding:
--extra-cflags='-Wshadow=local -Wno-error=shadow=local -Wno-error=shadow=compatible-local'
To configure
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925043023.71448-4-alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the
code needlessly hard to understand. Bugs love to hide in such code.
Evidence: "[PATCH v3 1/7] migration/rdma: Fix save_page method to fail
on polling error".
This patch removes the local variable shadowing. Tested by adding:
--extra-cflags='-Wshadow=local -Wno-error=shadow=local -Wno-error=shadow=compatible-local'
To configure
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925043023.71448-3-alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Fix:
target/mips/tcg/nanomips_translate.c.inc:4410:33: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
int32_t imm = extract32(ctx->opcode, 1, 13) |
^
target/mips/tcg/nanomips_translate.c.inc:3577:9: note: previous declaration is here
int imm;
^
target/mips/tcg/translate.c:15578:19: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
for (unsigned i = 1; i < 32; i++) {
^
target/mips/tcg/translate.c:15567:9: note: previous declaration is here
int i;
^
target/mips/tcg/msa_helper.c:7478:13: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
MSA_FLOAT_MAXOP(pwx->w[0], min, pws->w[0], pws->w[0], 32);
^
target/mips/tcg/msa_helper.c:7434:23: note: expanded from macro 'MSA_FLOAT_MAXOP'
float_status *status = &env->active_tc.msa_fp_status;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-5-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Per Peter Maydell analysis [*]:
The hvf_vcpu_exec() function is not documented, but in practice
its caller expects it to return either EXCP_DEBUG (for "this was
a guest debug exception you need to deal with") or something else
(presumably the intention being 0 for OK).
The hvf_sysreg_read() and hvf_sysreg_write() functions are also not
documented, but they return 0 on success, or 1 for a completely
unrecognized sysreg where we've raised the UNDEF exception (but
not if we raised an UNDEF exception for an unrecognized GIC sysreg --
I think this is a bug). We use this return value to decide whether
we need to advance the PC past the insn or not. It's not the same
as the return value we want to return from hvf_vcpu_exec().
Retain the variable as locally scoped but give it a name that
doesn't clash with the other function-scoped variable.
This fixes:
target/arm/hvf/hvf.c:1936:13: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow]
int ret = 0;
^
target/arm/hvf/hvf.c:1807:9: note: previous declaration is here
int ret;
^
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAFEAcA_e+fU6JKtS+W63wr9cCJ6btu_hT_ydZWOwC0kBkDYYYQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230904161235.84651-4-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
as this is an effective address and those cannot be signed,
it should not be a signed integer.
Signed-off-by: Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
Message-ID: <20230913105326.40832-11-kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
these are already defined in 'csfr.h.inc'. We don't need to duplicate
these registers.
Signed-off-by: Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
Message-ID: <20230913105326.40832-10-kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
