Add a parameter that enables discard-after-copy. That is mostly useful
in "push backup with fleecing" scheme, when source is snapshot-access
format driver node, based on copy-before-write filter snapshot-access
API:
[guest] [snapshot-access] ~~ blockdev-backup ~~> [backup target]
| |
| root | file
v v
[copy-before-write]
| |
| file | target
v v
[active disk] [temp.img]
In this case discard-after-copy does two things:
- discard data in temp.img to save disk space
- avoid further copy-before-write operation in discarded area
Note that we have to declare WRITE permission on source in
copy-before-write filter, for discard to work. Still we can't take it
unconditionally, as it will break normal backup from RO source. So, we
have to add a parameter and pass it thorough bdrv_open flags.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Tested-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240313152822.626493-5-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Currently block_copy creates copy_bitmap in source node. But that is in
bad relation with .independent_close=true of copy-before-write filter:
source node may be detached and removed before .bdrv_close() handler
called, which should call block_copy_state_free(), which in turn should
remove copy_bitmap.
That's all not ideal: it would be better if internal bitmap of
block-copy object is not attached to any node. But that is not possible
now.
The simplest solution is just create copy_bitmap in filter node, where
anyway two other bitmaps are created.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Tested-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-Id: <20240313152822.626493-4-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_block_status() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We have two inclusion loops:
block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac.
Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>
These functions end up calling bdrv_common_block_status_above(), a
generated_co_wrapper function.
In addition, they also happen to be always called in coroutine context,
meaning all callers are coroutine_fn.
This means that the g_c_w function will enter the qemu_in_coroutine()
case and eventually suspend (or in other words call qemu_coroutine_yield()).
Therefore we can mark such functions coroutine_fn too.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-3-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Add possibility to limit block_copy() call in time. To be used in the
next commit.
As timed-out block_copy() call will continue in background anyway (we
can't immediately cancel IO operation), it's important also give user a
possibility to pass a callback, to do some additional actions on
block-copy call finish.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Split block_copy_reset() out of block_copy_reset_unallocated() to be
used separately later.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303194349.2304213-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
This will be used in the following commit to bring "incremental" mode
to copy-before-write filter.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303194349.2304213-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
The only caller pass copy_range and compress both false. Let's just
drop these arguments.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-35-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
The main consumer of cluster-size is block-copy. Let's calculate it
here instead of passing through backup-top.
We are going to publish copy-before-write filter soon, so it will be
created through options. But we don't want for now to make explicit
option for cluster-size, let's continue to calculate it automatically.
So, now is the time to get rid of cluster_size argument for
bdrv_cbw_append().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-10-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[hreitz: Add qemu/error-report.h include to block/block-copy.c]
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
We'll need a possibility to set compress and use_copy_range options
after initialization of the state. So make corresponding part of
block_copy_state_new() separate and public.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
We want to simplify initialization interface of copy-before-write
filter as we are going to make it public. So, let's detect fleecing
scheme exactly in block-copy code, to not pass this information through
extra levels.
Why not just set BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING unconditionally: because we are
going to implement new more efficient fleecing scheme which will not
rely on backing feature.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
By adding acquire/release pairs, we ensure that .ret and .error_is_read
fields are written by block_copy_dirty_clusters before .finished is true,
and that they are read by API user after .finished is true.
The atomic here are necessary because the fields are concurrently modified
in coroutines, and read outside.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210624072043.180494-6-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210116214705.822267-21-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Drop unused code.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210116214705.822267-20-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Add function to cancel running async block-copy call. It will be used
in backup.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210116214705.822267-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
We are going to directly use one async block-copy operation for backup
job, so we need rate limiter.
We want to maintain current backup behavior: only background copying is
limited and copy-before-write operations only participate in limit
calculation. Therefore we need one rate limiter for block-copy state
and boolean flag for block-copy call state for actual limitation.
Note, that we can't just calculate each chunk in limiter after
successful copying: it will not save us from starting a lot of async
sub-requests which will exceed limit too much. Instead let's use the
following scheme on sub-request creation:
1. If at the moment limit is not exceeded, create the request and
account it immediately.
2. If at the moment limit is already exceeded, drop create sub-request
and handle limit instead (by sleep).
With this approach we'll never exceed the limit more than by one
sub-request (which pretty much matches current backup behavior).
Note also, that if there is in-flight block-copy async call,
block_copy_kick() should be used after set-speed to apply new setup
faster. For that block_copy_kick() published in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210116214705.822267-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
They will be used for backup.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210116214705.822267-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
We'll need async block-copy invocation to use in backup directly.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210116214705.822267-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Experiments show, that copy_range is not always making things faster.
So, to make experimentation simpler, let's add a parameter. Some more
perf parameters will be added soon, so here is a new struct.
For now, add new backup qmp parameter with x- prefix for the following
reasons:
- We are going to add more performance parameters, some will be
related to the whole block-copy process, some only to background
copying in backup (ignored for copy-before-write operations).
- On the other hand, we are going to use block-copy interface in other
block jobs, which will need performance options as well.. And it
should be the same structure or at least somehow related.
So, there are too much unclean things about how the interface and now
we need the new options mostly for testing. Let's keep them
experimental for a while.
In do_backup_common() new x-perf parameter handled in a way to
make further options addition simpler.
We add use-copy-range with default=true, and we'll change the default
in further patch, after moving backup to use block-copy.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210116214705.822267-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[mreitz: s/5\.2/6.0/]
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Hide structure definitions and add explicit API instead, to keep an
eye on the scope of the shared fields.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200311103004.7649-10-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
offset/bytes pair is more usual naming in block layer, let's use it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200311103004.7649-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
We have a lot of "chunk_end - start" invocations, let's switch to
bytes/cur_bytes scheme instead.
While being here, improve check on block_copy_do_copy parameters to not
overflow when calculating nbytes and use int64_t for bytes in
block_copy for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200311103004.7649-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Assume we have two regions, A and B, and region B is in-flight now,
region A is not yet touched, but it is unallocated and should be
skipped.
Correspondingly, as progress we have
total = A + B
current = 0
If we reset unallocated region A and call progress_reset_callback,
it will calculate 0 bytes dirty in the bitmap and call
job_progress_set_remaining, which will set
total = current + 0 = 0 + 0 = 0
So, B bytes are actually removed from total accounting. When job
finishes we'll have
total = 0
current = B
, which doesn't sound good.
This is because we didn't considered in-flight bytes, actually when
calculating remaining, we should have set (in_flight + dirty_bytes)
as remaining, not only dirty_bytes.
To fix it, let's refactor progress calculation, moving it to block-copy
itself instead of fixing callback. And, of course, track in_flight
bytes count.
We still have to keep one callback, to maintain backup job bytes_read
calculation, but it will go on soon, when we turn the whole backup
process into one block_copy call.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20200311103004.7649-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
No reason to limit buffered copy to one cluster. Let's allow up to 1
MiB.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Currently total allocation for parallel requests to block-copy instance
is unlimited. Let's limit it to 128 MiB.
For now block-copy is used only in backup, so actually we limit total
allocation for backup job.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Drop write notifiers and use filter node instead.
= Changes =
1. Add filter-node-name argument for backup qmp api. We have to do it
in this commit, as 257 needs to be fixed.
2. There are no more write notifiers here, so is_write_notifier
parameter is dropped from block-copy paths.
3. To sync with in-flight requests at job finish we now have drained
removing of the filter, we don't need rw-lock.
4. Block-copy is now using BdrvChildren instead of BlockBackends
5. As backup-top owns these children, we also move block-copy state
into backup-top's ownership.
= Iotest changes =
56: op-blocker doesn't shoot now, as we set it on source, but then
check on filter, when trying to start second backup.
To keep the test we instead can catch another collision: both jobs will
get 'drive0' job-id, as job-id parameter is unspecified. To prevent
interleaving with file-posix locks (as they are dependent on config)
let's use another target for second backup.
Also, it's obvious now that we'd like to drop this op-blocker at all
and add a test-case for two backups from one node (to different
destinations) actually works. But not in these series.
141: Output changed: prepatch, "Node is in use" comes from bdrv_has_blk
check inside qmp_blockdev_del. But we've dropped block-copy blk
objects, so no more blk objects on source bs (job blk is on backup-top
filter bs). New message is from op-blocker, which is the next check in
qmp_blockdev_add.
257: The test wants to emulate guest write during backup. They should
go to filter node, not to original source node, of course. Therefore we
need to specify filter node name and use it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Split block_copy_set_callbacks out of block_copy_state_new. It's needed
for further commit: block-copy will use BdrvChildren of backup-top
filter, so it will be created from backup-top filter creation function.
But callbacks will still belong to backup job and will be set in
separate.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Move synchronization mechanism to block-copy, to be able to use one
block-copy instance from backup job and backup-top filter in parallel.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Split block_copy to separate file, to be cleanly shared with backup-top
filter driver in further commits.
It's a clean movement, the only change is drop "static" from interface
functions.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190920142056.12778-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
