Some functions must not be called from coroutine context. The common
pattern to use them anyway from a coroutine is running them in a BH and
letting the calling coroutine yield to be woken up when the BH is
completed.
Instead of manually writing such wrappers, add support for generating
them to block-coroutine-wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230126172432.436111-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Just omit the various 'return' when the return type is void.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We have two inclusion loops:
block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac.
Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Add co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock and co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock option to
the block-coroutine-wrapper.py script.
This "_bdrv_rdlock" option takes and releases the graph rdlock when a
coroutine function is created.
This means that when used together with "_mixed", the function marked
with co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock will support both coroutine and
non-coroutine case, and in the latter case it will create a coroutine
that takes and releases the rdlock. When called from a coroutine, the
caller must already hold the graph lock.
Example:
void co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock bdrv_f1();
Becomes
static void bdrv_co_enter_f1()
{
bdrv_graph_co_rdlock();
bdrv_co_function();
bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock();
}
void bdrv_f1()
{
if (qemu_in_coroutine) {
assume_graph_lock();
bdrv_co_function();
} else {
qemu_co_enter(bdrv_co_enter_f1);
...
}
}
When used alone, the function will not work in coroutine context, and
when called in non-coroutine context it will create a new coroutine that
takes care of taking and releasing the rdlock automatically.
Example:
void co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock bdrv_f1();
Becomes
static void bdrv_co_enter_f1()
{
bdrv_graph_co_rdlock();
bdrv_co_function();
bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock();
}
void bdrv_f1()
{
assert(!qemu_in_coroutine());
qemu_co_enter(bdrv_co_enter_f1);
...
}
About their usage:
- co_wrapper does not take the rdlock, so it can be used also outside
the block layer.
- co_wrapper_mixed will be used by many blk_* functions, since the
coroutine function needs to call blk_wait_while_drained() and
the rdlock *must* be taken afterwards, otherwise it's a deadlock.
In the future this annotation will go away, and blk_* will use
co_wrapper directly.
- co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock will be used by BlockDriver callbacks, ideally
by all of them in the future.
- co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock will be used by the remaining functions
that are still called by coroutine and non-coroutine context. In the
future this annotation will go away, as we will split such mixed
functions.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Extend the regex to cover also return type, pointers included.
This implies that the value returned by the function cannot be
a simple "int" anymore, but the custom return type.
Therefore remove poll_state->ret and instead use a per-function
custom "ret" field.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-13-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Right now, we take the first parameter of the function to get the
BlockDriverState to pass to bdrv_poll_co(), that internally calls
functions that figure in which aiocontext the coroutine should run.
However, it is useless to pass a bs just to get its own AioContext,
so instead pass it directly, and default to the main loop if no
BlockDriverState is passed as parameter.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-12-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This new annotation starts just a function wrapper that creates
a new coroutine. It assumes the caller is not a coroutine.
It will be the default annotation to be used in the future.
This is much better as c_w_mixed, because it is clear if the caller
is a coroutine or not, and provides the advantage of automating
the code creation. In the future all c_w_mixed functions will be
substituted by co_wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-11-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
In preparation to the incoming new function specifiers,
rename g_c_w with a more meaningful name and document it.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-10-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20211006131718.214235-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We are going to reuse the script to generate a nbd_ function in
further commit. Prepare the script now.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210610100802.5888-28-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We have a very frequent pattern of creating a coroutine from a function
with several arguments:
- create a structure to pack parameters
- create _entry function to call original function taking parameters
from struct
- do different magic to handle completion: set ret to NOT_DONE or
EINPROGRESS or use separate bool field
- fill the struct and create coroutine from _entry function with this
struct as a parameter
- do coroutine enter and BDRV_POLL_WHILE loop
Let's reduce code duplication by generating coroutine wrappers.
This patch adds scripts/block-coroutine-wrapper.py together with some
friends, which will generate functions with declared prototypes marked
by the 'generated_co_wrapper' specifier.
The usage of new code generation is as follows:
1. define the coroutine function somewhere
int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_NAME(...) {...}
2. declare in some header file
int generated_co_wrapper bdrv_NAME(...);
with same list of parameters (generated_co_wrapper is
defined in "include/block/block.h").
3. Make sure the block_gen_c declaration in block/meson.build
mentions the file with your marker function.
Still, no function is now marked, this work is for the following
commit.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200924185414.28642-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[Added encoding='utf-8' to open() calls as requested by Vladimir. Fixed
typo and grammar issues pointed out by Eric Blake. Removed clang-format
dependency that caused build test issues.
--Stefan]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
