The v8M architecture includes hardware support for enforcing
stack pointer limits. We don't implement this behaviour yet,
but provide the MSPLIM and PSPLIM stack pointer limit registers
as reads-as-written, so that when we do implement the checks
in future this won't break guest migration.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In commit 50f11062d4 we added support for MSR/MRS access
to the NS banked special registers, but we forgot to implement
the support for writing to CONTROL_NS. Correct the omission.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This also makes sure that we get the correct ordering of
SVE vs FP exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180211205848.4568-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Nothing in either register affects the TB.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180211205848.4568-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180211205848.4568-3-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Because they are ARM_CP_STATE_AA64, ARM_CP_64BIT is implied.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180211205848.4568-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add both SVE exception state and vector length.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180123035349.24538-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Handle possible MPU faults, SAU faults or bus errors when
popping register state off the stack during exception return.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1517324542-6607-8-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the load of the exception vector from the vector table honour
the SAU and any bus error on the load (possibly provoking a derived
exception), rather than simply aborting if the load fails.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1517324542-6607-7-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make v7m_push_callee_stack() honour the MPU by using the
new v7m_stack_write() function. We return a flag to indicate
whether the pushes failed, which we can then use in
v7m_exception_taken() to cause us to handle the derived
exception correctly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1517324542-6607-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The memory writes done to push registers on the stack
on exception entry in M profile CPUs are supposed to
go via MPU permissions checks, which may cause us to
take a derived exception instead of the original one of
the MPU lookup fails. We were implementing these as
always-succeeds direct writes to physical memory.
Rewrite v7m_push_stack() to do the necessary checks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1517324542-6607-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the v8M architecture, if the process of taking an exception
results in a further exception this is called a derived exception
(for example, an MPU exception when writing the exception frame to
memory). If the derived exception happens while pushing the initial
stack frame, we must ignore any subsequent possible exception
pushing the callee-saves registers.
In preparation for making the stack writes check for exceptions,
add a return value from v7m_push_stack() and a new parameter to
v7m_exception_taken(), so that the former can tell the latter that
it needs to ignore failures to write to the stack. We also plumb
the argument through to v7m_push_callee_stack(), which is where
the code to ignore the failures will be.
(Note that the v8M ARM pseudocode structures this slightly differently:
derived exceptions cause the attempt to process the original
exception to be abandoned; then at the top level it calls
DerivedLateArrival to prioritize the derived exception and call
TakeException from there. We choose to let the NVIC do the prioritization
and continue forward with a call to TakeException which will then
take either the original or the derived exception. The effect is
the same, but this structure works better for QEMU because we don't
have a convenient top level place to do the abandon-and-retry logic.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1517324542-6607-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() does three things:
* make the current highest priority pending interrupt active
* return a bool indicating whether that interrupt is targeting
Secure or NonSecure state
* implicitly tell the caller which is the highest priority
pending interrupt by setting env->v7m.exception
We need to split these jobs, because v7m_exception_taken()
needs to know whether the pending interrupt targets Secure so
it can choose to stack callee-saves registers or not, but it
must not make the interrupt active until after it has done
that stacking, in case the stacking causes a derived exception.
Similarly, it needs to know the number of the pending interrupt
so it can read the correct vector table entry before the
interrupt is made active, because vector table reads might
also cause a derived exception.
Create a new armv7m_nvic_get_pending_irq_info() function which simply
returns information about the highest priority pending interrupt, and
use it to rearrange the v7m_exception_taken() code so we don't
acknowledge the exception until we've done all the things which could
possibly cause a derived exception.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1517324542-6607-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180119045438.28582-16-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180119045438.28582-15-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180119045438.28582-14-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Helpers that return a pointer into env->vfp.regs so that we isolate
the logic of how to index the regs array for different cpu modes.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180119045438.28582-7-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
All direct users of this field want an integral value. Drop all
of the extra casting between uint64_t and float64.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180119045438.28582-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Commit ("3b39d734141a target/arm: Handle page table walk load failures
correctly") modified both versions of the page table walking code (i.e.,
arm_ldl_ptw and arm_ldq_ptw) to record the result of the translation in
a temporary 'data' variable so that it can be inspected before being
returned. However, arm_ldq_ptw() returns an uint64_t, and using a
temporary uint32_t variable truncates the upper bits, corrupting the
result. This causes problems when using more than 4 GB of memory in
a TCG guest. So use a uint64_t instead.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180119194648.25501-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Instead of ignoring the response from address_space_ld*()
(indicating an attempt to read a page table descriptor from
an invalid physical address), use it to report the failure
correctly.
Since this is another couple of locations where we need to
decide the value of the ARMMMUFaultInfo ea bit based on a
MemTxResult, we factor out that operation into a helper
function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
For PMSAv7, the v7A/R Arm ARM defines that setting AP to 0b111
is an UNPREDICTABLE reserved combination. However, for v7M
this value is documented as having the same behaviour as 0b110:
read-only for both privileged and unprivileged. Accept this
value on an M profile core rather than treating it as a guest
error and a no-access page.
Reported-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1512742402-31669-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now that do_ats_write() is entirely in control of whether to
generate a 32-bit PAR or a 64-bit PAR, we can make it use the
correct (complicated) condition for doing so.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-13-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
[PMM: Rebased Edgar's patch on top of get_phys_addr() refactoring;
use arm_s1_regime_using_lpae_format() rather than
regime_using_lpae_format() because the latter will assert
if passed ARMMMUIdx_S12NSE0 or ARMMMUIdx_S12NSE1;
updated commit message appropriately]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
All of the callers of get_phys_addr() and arm_tlb_fill() now ignore
the FSR values they return, so we can just remove the argument
entirely.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-12-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In do_ats_write(), rather than using the FSR value from get_phys_addr(),
construct the PAR values using the information in the ARMMMUFaultInfo
struct. This allows us to create a PAR of the correct format regardless
of what the translation table format is.
For the moment we leave the condition for "when should this be a
64 bit PAR" as it was previously; this will need to be fixed to
properly support AArch32 Hyp mode.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-11-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make get_phys_addr_pmsav8() return a fault type in the ARMMMUFaultInfo
structure, which we convert to the FSC at the callsite.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-9-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make get_phys_addr_pmsav7() return a fault type in the ARMMMUFaultInfo
structure, which we convert to the FSC at the callsite.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-8-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make get_phys_addr_pmsav5() return a fault type in the ARMMMUFaultInfo
structure, which we convert to the FSC at the callsite.
Note that PMSAv5 does not define any guest-visible fault status
register, so the different "fsr" values we were previously
returning are entirely arbitrary. So we can just switch to using
the most appropriae fi->type values without worrying that we
need to special-case FaultInfo->FSC conversion for PMSAv5.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-7-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make get_phys_addr_v6() return a fault type in the ARMMMUFaultInfo
structure, which we convert to the FSC at the callsite.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make get_phys_addr_v6() return a fault type in the ARMMMUFaultInfo
structure, which we convert to the FSC at the callsite.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make get_phys_addr_v5() return a fault type in the ARMMMUFaultInfo
structure, which we convert to the FSC at the callsite.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
All the callers of arm_ldq_ptw() and arm_ldl_ptw() ignore the value
that those functions store in the fsr argument on failure: if they
return failure to their callers they will always overwrite the fsr
value with something else.
Remove the argument from these functions and S1_ptw_translate().
This will simplify removing fsr from the calling functions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1512503192-2239-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the TT instruction which queries the security
state and access permissions of a memory location.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1512153879-5291-8-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For the TT instruction we're going to need to do an MPU lookup that
also tells us which MPU region the access hit. This requires us
to do the MPU lookup without first doing the SAU security access
check, so pull the MPU lookup parts of get_phys_addr_pmsav8()
out into their own function.
The TT instruction also needs to know the MPU region number which
the lookup hit, so provide this information to the caller of the
MPU lookup code, even though get_phys_addr_pmsav8() doesn't
need to know it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1512153879-5291-7-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
For M profile, we currently have an mmu index MNegPri for
"requested execution priority negative". This fails to
distinguish "requested execution priority negative, privileged"
from "requested execution priority negative, usermode", but
the two can return different results for MPU lookups. Fix this
by splitting MNegPri into MNegPriPriv and MNegPriUser, and
similarly for the Secure equivalent MSNegPri.
This takes us from 6 M profile MMU modes to 8, which means
we need to bump NB_MMU_MODES; this is OK since the point
where we are forced to reduce TLB sizes is 9 MMU modes.
(It would in theory be possible to stick with 6 MMU indexes:
{mpu-disabled,user,privileged} x {secure,nonsecure} since
in the MPU-disabled case the result of an MPU lookup is
always the same for both user and privileged code. However
we would then need to rework the TB flags handling to put
user/priv into the TB flags separately from the mmuidx.
Adding an extra couple of mmu indexes is simpler.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1512153879-5291-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
When we added the ARMMMUIdx_MSUser MMU index we forgot to
add it to the case statement in regime_is_user(), so we
weren't treating it as unprivileged when doing MPU lookups.
Correct the omission.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1512153879-5291-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
In ARMv7M the CPU ignores explicit writes to CONTROL.SPSEL
in Handler mode. In v8M the behaviour is slightly different:
writes to the bit are permitted but will have no effect.
We've already done the hard work to handle the value in
CONTROL.SPSEL being out of sync with what stack pointer is
actually in use, so all we need to do to fix this last loose
end is to update the condition we use to guard whether we
call write_v7m_control_spsel() on the register write.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1512153879-5291-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For v8M it is possible for the CONTROL.SPSEL bit value and the
current stack to be out of sync. This means we need to update
the checks used in reads and writes of the PSP and MSP special
registers to use v7m_using_psp() rather than directly checking
the SPSEL bit in the control register.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1512153879-5291-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
In do_ats_write(), rather than using extended_addresses_enabled() to
decide whether the value we get back from get_phys_addr() is a 64-bit
format PAR or a 32-bit one, use arm_s1_regime_using_lpae_format().
This is not really the correct answer, because the PAR format
depends on the AT instruction being used, not just on the
translation regime. However getting this correct requires a
significant refactoring, so that get_phys_addr() returns raw
information about the fault which the caller can then assemble
into a suitable FSR/PAR/syndrome for its purposes, rather than
get_phys_addr() returning a pre-formatted FSR.
However this change at least improves the situation by making
the PAR work correctly for address translation operations done
at AArch64 EL2 on the EL2 translation regime. In particular,
this is necessary for Xen to be able to run in our emulation,
so this seems like a safer interim fix given that we are in freeze.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1509719814-6191-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The CPU ID registers ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, ID_PFR1_EL1 and ID_PFR1
have a field for reporting presence of GICv3 system registers.
We need to report this field correctly in order for Xen to
work as a guest inside QEMU emulation. We mustn't incorrectly
claim the sysregs exist when they don't, though, or Linux will
crash.
Unfortunately the way we've designed the GICv3 emulation in QEMU
puts the system registers as part of the GICv3 device, which
may be created after the CPU proper has been realized. This
means that we don't know at the point when we define the ID
registers what the correct value is. Handle this by switching
them to calling a function at runtime to read the value, where
we can fill in the GIC field appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Message-id: 1510066898-3725-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
On a successful address translation instruction, PAR is supposed to
contain cacheability and shareability attributes determined by the
translation. We previously returned 0 for these bits (in line with the
general strategy of ignoring caches and memory attributes), but some
guest OSes may depend on them.
This patch collects the attribute bits in the page-table walk, and
updates PAR with the correct attributes for all LPAE translations.
Short descriptor formats still return 0 for these bits, as in the
prior implementation.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Baumann <Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com>
Message-id: 20171031223830.4608-1-Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Secure function return happens when a non-secure function has been
called using BLXNS and so has a particular magic LR value (either
0xfefffffe or 0xfeffffff). The function return via BX behaves
specially when the new PC value is this magic value, in the same
way that exception returns are handled.
Adjust our BX excret guards so that they recognize the function
return magic number as well, and perform the function-return
unstacking in do_v7m_exception_exit().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1507556919-24992-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the BLXNS instruction, which allows secure code to
call non-secure code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1507556919-24992-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the SG instruction, which we emulate 'by hand' in the
exception handling code path.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1507556919-24992-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the security attribute lookups for memory accesses
in the get_phys_addr() functions, causing these to generate
various kinds of SecureFault for bad accesses.
The major subtlety in this code relates to handling of the
case when the security attributes the SAU assigns to the
address don't match the current security state of the CPU.
In the ARM ARM pseudocode for validating instruction
accesses, the security attributes of the address determine
whether the Secure or NonSecure MPU state is used. At face
value, handling this would require us to encode the relevant
bits of state into mmu_idx for both S and NS at once, which
would result in our needing 16 mmu indexes. Fortunately we
don't actually need to do this because a mismatch between
address attributes and CPU state means either:
* some kind of fault (usually a SecureFault, but in theory
perhaps a UserFault for unaligned access to Device memory)
* execution of the SG instruction in NS state from a
Secure & NonSecure code region
The purpose of SG is simply to flip the CPU into Secure
state, so we can handle it by emulating execution of that
instruction directly in arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(), which
means we can treat all the mismatch cases as "throw an
exception" and we don't need to encode the state of the
other MPU bank into our mmu_idx values.
This commit doesn't include the actual emulation of SG;
it also doesn't include implementation of the IDAU, which
is a per-board way to specify hard-coded memory attributes
for addresses, which override the CPU-internal SAU if they
specify a more secure setting than the SAU is programmed to.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-15-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add support for v8M and in particular the security extension
to the exception entry code. This requires changes to:
* calculation of the exception-return magic LR value
* push the callee-saves registers in certain cases
* clear registers when taking non-secure exceptions to avoid
leaking information from the interrupted secure code
* switch to the correct security state on entry
* use the vector table for the security state we're targeting
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-13-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For v8M, exceptions from Secure to Non-Secure state will save
callee-saved registers to the exception frame as well as the
caller-saved registers. Add support for unstacking these
registers in exception exit when necessary.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-12-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In v8M, more bits are defined in the exception-return magic
values; update the code that checks these so we accept
the v8M values when the CPU permits them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-11-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the v8M architecture, return from an exception to a PC which
has bit 0 set is not UNPREDICTABLE; it is defined that bit 0
is discarded [R_HRJH]. Restrict our complaint about this to v7M.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-9-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Attempting to do an exception return with an exception frame that
is not 8-aligned is UNPREDICTABLE in v8M; warn about this.
(It is not UNPREDICTABLE in v7M, and our implementation can
handle the merely-4-aligned case fine, so we don't need to
do anything except warn.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-8-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
