To ensure our TLB isn't out-of-date we flush it on all virt mode
changes. Unlike priv mode this isn't saved in the mmu_idx as all
guests share V=1. The easiest option is just to flush on all changes.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Dump the Hypervisor registers and the current Hypervisor state.
While we are editing this code let's also dump stvec and scause.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Update the CSR permission checking to work correctly when we are in
HS-mode.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Add a FORCE_HS_EXCEP mode to the RISC-V virtulisation status. This bit
specifies if an exeption should be taken to HS mode no matter the
current delegation status. This is used when an exeption must be taken
to HS mode, such as when handling interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
The v0.5 Hypervisor spec add new execption numbers, let's add support
for those.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Add the Hypervisor CSRs to CPUState and at the same time (to avoid
bisect issues) update the CSR macros for the v0.5 Hyp spec.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
The MIP CSR is a xlen CSR, it was only 32-bits to allow atomic access.
Now that we don't use atomics for MIP we can change this back to a xlen
CSR.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
The plugin system would throw up a harmless warning when it detected
that a disassembly of an instruction didn't use all it's bytes. Fix
the riscv decoder to only load the instruction bytes it needs as it
needs them.
This drops opcode from the ctx in favour if passing the appropriately
sized opcode down a few levels of the decode.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200225124710.14152-15-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
The fxam instruction returns the wrong result after fdecstp or after
an underflow. Check fptags to handle this.
Reported-by: <chengang@emindsoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We are going to convert FEATURE tests to ISAR tests,
so FPSP needs to be set for these cpus, like we have
already for FPDP.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214181547.21408-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Many uses of ARM_FEATURE_VFP3 are testing for the number of simd
registers implemented. Use the proper test vs MVFR0.SIMDReg.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214181547.21408-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org
[PMM: fix typo in commit message]
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The old name, isar_feature_aa32_fp_d32, does not reflect
the MVFR0 field name, SIMDReg.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200214181547.21408-3-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: wrapped one long line]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
We still need two different helpers, since NEON and SVE2 get the
inputs from different locations within the source vector. However,
we can convert both to the same internal form for computation.
The sve2 helper is not used yet, but adding it with this patch
helps illustrate why the neon changes are helpful.
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200216214232.4230-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The gvec form will be needed for implementing SVE2.
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200216214232.4230-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The gvec form will be needed for implementing SVE2.
Extend the implementation to operate on uint64_t instead of uint32_t.
Use a counted inner loop instead of terminating when op1 goes to zero,
looking toward the required implementation for ARMv8.4-DIT.
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200216214232.4230-3-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
These instructions shift left or right depending on the sign
of the input, and 7 bits are significant to the shift. This
requires several masks and selects in addition to the actual
shifts to form the complete answer.
That said, the operation is still a small improvement even for
two 64-bit elements -- 13 vector operations instead of 2 * 7
integer operations.
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200216214232.4230-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The ACTLR2 and HACTLR2 AArch32 system registers didn't exist in ARMv7
or the original ARMv8. They were later added as optional registers,
whose presence is signaled by the ID_MMFR4.AC2 field. From ARMv8.2
they are mandatory (ie ID_MMFR4.AC2 must be non-zero).
We implemented HACTLR2 in commit 0e0456ab88, but we
incorrectly made it exist for all v8 CPUs, and we didn't implement
ACTLR2 at all.
Sort this out by implementing both registers only when they are
supposed to exist, and setting the ID_MMFR4 bit for -cpu max.
Note that this removes HACTLR2 from our Cortex-A53, -A47 and -A72
CPU models; this is correct, because those CPUs do not implement
this register.
Fixes: 0e0456ab88
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-22-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Cut-and-paste errors mean we're using FIELD_EX64() to extract fields from
some 32-bit ID register fields. Use FIELD_EX32() instead. (This makes
no difference in behaviour, it's just more consistent.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-21-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now we have moved ID_MMFR4 into the ARMISARegisters struct, we
can define and use an isar_feature for the presence of the
ARMv8.2-AA32HPD feature, rather than open-coding the test.
While we're here, correct a comment typo which missed an 'A'
from the feature name.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-20-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The isar_feature_aa32_pan and isar_feature_aa32_ats1e1 functions
are supposed to be testing fields in ID_MMFR3; but a cut-and-paste
error meant we were looking at MVFR0 instead.
Fix the functions to look at the right register; this requires
us to move at least id_mmfr3 to the ARMISARegisters struct; we
choose to move all the ID_MMFRn registers for consistency.
Fixes: 3d6ad6bb46
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The LC bit in the PMCR_EL0 register is supposed to be:
* read/write
* RES1 on an AArch64-only implementation
* an architecturally UNKNOWN value on reset
(and use of LC==0 by software is deprecated).
We were implementing it incorrectly as read-only always zero,
though we do have all the code needed to test it and behave
accordingly.
Instead make it a read-write bit which resets to 1 always, which
satisfies all the architectural requirements above.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The PMCR_EL0.DP bit is bit 5, which is 0x20, not 0x10. 0x10 is 'X'.
Correct our #define of PMCRDP and add the missing PMCRX.
We do have the correct behaviour for handling the DP bit being
set, so this fixes a guest-visible bug.
Fixes: 033614c47d
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Set the ID register bits to provide ARMv8.4-PMU (and implicitly
also ARMv8.1-PMU) in the 'max' CPU.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The ARMv8.4-PMU extension adds:
* one new required event, STALL
* one new system register PMMIR_EL1
(There are also some more L1-cache related events, but since
we don't implement any cache we don't provide these, in the
same way we don't provide the base-PMUv3 cache events.)
The STALL event "counts every attributable cycle on which no
attributable instruction or operation was sent for execution on this
PE". QEMU doesn't stall in this sense, so this is another
always-reads-zero event.
The PMMIR_EL1 register is a read-only register providing
implementation-specific information about the PMU; currently it has
only one field, SLOTS, which defines behaviour of the STALL_SLOT PMU
event. Since QEMU doesn't implement the STALL_SLOT event, we can
validly make the register read zero.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The ARMv8.1-PMU extension requires:
* the evtCount field in PMETYPER<n>_EL0 is 16 bits, not 10
* MDCR_EL2.HPMD allows event counting to be disabled at EL2
* two new required events, STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND
* ID register bits in ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 and ID_DFR0
We already implement the 16-bit evtCount field and the
HPMD bit, so all that is missing is the two new events:
STALL_FRONTEND
"counts every cycle counted by the CPU_CYCLES event on which no
operation was issued because there are no operations available
to issue to this PE from the frontend"
STALL_BACKEND
"counts every cycle counted by the CPU_CYCLES event on which no
operation was issued because the backend is unable to accept
any available operations from the frontend"
QEMU never stalls in this sense, so our implementation is trivial:
always return a zero count.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now we have isar_feature test functions that look at fields in the
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 and ID_DFR0 ID registers, add the code that reads
these register values from KVM so that the checks behave correctly
when we're using KVM.
No isar_feature function tests ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 or DBGDIDR yet, but we
add it to maintain the invariant that every field in the
ARMISARegisters struct is populated for a KVM CPU and can be relied
on. This requirement isn't actually written down yet, so add a note
to the relevant comment.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We're going to want to read the DBGDIDR register from KVM in
a subsequent commit, which means it needs to be in the
ARMISARegisters sub-struct. Move it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The AArch32 DBGDIDR defines properties like the number of
breakpoints, watchpoints and context-matching comparators. On an
AArch64 CPU, the register may not even exist if AArch32 is not
supported at EL1.
Currently we hard-code use of DBGDIDR to identify the number of
breakpoints etc; this works for all our TCG CPUs, but will break if
we ever add an AArch64-only CPU. We also have an assert() that the
AArch32 and AArch64 registers match, which currently works only by
luck for KVM because we don't populate either of these ID registers
from the KVM vCPU and so they are both zero.
Clean this up so we have functions for finding the number
of breakpoints, watchpoints and context comparators which look
in the appropriate ID register.
This allows us to drop the "check that AArch64 and AArch32 agree
on the number of breakpoints etc" asserts:
* we no longer look at the AArch32 versions unless that's the
right place to be looking
* it's valid to have a CPU (eg AArch64-only) where they don't match
* we shouldn't have been asserting the validity of ID registers
in a codepath used with KVM anyway
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add the 64-bit version of the "is this a v8.1 PMUv3?"
ID register check function, and the _any_ version that
checks for either AArch32 or AArch64 support. We'll use
this in a later commit.
We don't (yet) do any isar_feature checks on ID_AA64DFR1_EL1,
but we move id_aa64dfr1 into the ARMISARegisters struct with
id_aa64dfr0, for consistency.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Instead of open-coding a check on the ID_DFR0 PerfMon ID register
field, create a standardly-named isar_feature for "does AArch32 have
a v8.1 PMUv3" and use it.
This entails moving the id_dfr0 field into the ARMISARegisters struct.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We already define FIELD macros for ID_DFR0, so use them in the
one place where we're doing direct bit value manipulation.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add FIELD() definitions for the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 and use them
where we currently have hard-coded bit values.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Pull the code that defines the various PMU registers out
into its own function, matching the pattern we have
already for the debug registers.
Apart from one style fix to a multi-line comment, this
is purely movement of code with no changes to it.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Instead of open-coding "ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64 ? aa64_predinv: aa32_predinv",
define and use an any_predinv isar_feature test function.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Our current usage of the isar_feature feature tests almost always
uses an _aa32_ test when the code path is known to be AArch32
specific and an _aa64_ test when the code path is known to be
AArch64 specific. There is just one exception: in the vfp_set_fpscr
helper we check aa64_fp16 to determine whether the FZ16 bit in
the FP(S)CR exists, but this code is also used for AArch32.
There are other places in future where we're likely to want
a general "does this feature exist for either AArch32 or
AArch64" check (typically where architecturally the feature exists
for both CPU states if it exists at all, but the CPU might be
AArch32-only or AArch64-only, and so only have one set of ID
registers).
Introduce a new category of isar_feature_* functions:
isar_feature_any_foo() should be tested when what we want to
know is "does this feature exist for either AArch32 or AArch64",
and always returns the logical OR of isar_feature_aa32_foo()
and isar_feature_aa64_foo().
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
