This is a cleanup for previous removal of unsentmap.
The sent parameter is not necessary now.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190819061843.28642-4-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Commit f3f491fcd6 ('Postcopy: Maintain unsentmap') introduced
unsentmap to track not yet sent pages.
This is not necessary since:
* unsentmap is a sub-set of bmap before postcopy start
* unsentmap is the summation of bmap and unsentmap after canonicalizing
This patch just removes it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190819061843.28642-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
All pages, either partially sent or partially dirty, will be discarded in
postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram(), since we update the unsentmap to be
unsentmap = unsentmap | dirty in ram_postcopy_send_discard_bitmap().
This is not necessary to do discard when canonicalizing bitmap. And by
doing so, we separate the page discard into two individual steps:
* canonicalize bitmap
* discard page
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190819061843.28642-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Commit 78dd48df3 removed the last caller of register_savevm_live for an
instantiable device (rather than a single system wide device);
so trim out the parameter.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190822115433.12070-1-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
When encounter error, multifd_send_thread should always notify who pay
attention to it before exit. Otherwise it may block migration_thread
at multifd_send_sync_main forever.
Error as follow:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f4d669dfa0b in do_futex_wait.constprop.1 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x00007f4d669dfa9f in __new_sem_wait_slow.constprop.0 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#2 0x00007f4d669dfb3b in sem_wait@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#3 0x0000562ccf0a5614 in qemu_sem_wait (sem=sem@entry=0x562cd1b698e8) at util/qemu-thread-posix.c:319
#4 0x0000562ccecb4752 in multifd_send_sync_main (rs=<optimized out>) at /qemu/migration/ram.c:1099
#5 0x0000562ccecb95f4 in ram_save_iterate (f=0x562cd0ecc000, opaque=<optimized out>) at /qemu/migration/ram.c:3550
#6 0x0000562ccef43c23 in qemu_savevm_state_iterate (f=0x562cd0ecc000, postcopy=false) at migration/savevm.c:1189
#7 0x0000562ccef3dcf3 in migration_iteration_run (s=0x562cd09fabf0) at migration/migration.c:3131
#8 migration_thread (opaque=opaque@entry=0x562cd09fabf0) at migration/migration.c:3258
#9 0x0000562ccf0a4c26 in qemu_thread_start (args=<optimized out>) at util/qemu-thread-posix.c:502
#10 0x00007f4d669d9e25 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#11 0x00007f4d6670635d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) f 4
#4 0x0000562ccecb4752 in multifd_send_sync_main (rs=<optimized out>) at /qemu/migration/ram.c:1099
1099 qemu_sem_wait(&p->sem_sync);
(gdb) list
1094 }
1095 for (i = 0; i < migrate_multifd_channels(); i++) {
1096 MultiFDSendParams *p = &multifd_send_state->params[i];
1097
1098 trace_multifd_send_sync_main_wait(p->id);
1099 qemu_sem_wait(&p->sem_sync);
1100 }
1101 trace_multifd_send_sync_main(multifd_send_state->packet_num);
1102 }
1103
(gdb) p i
$1 = 0
(gdb) p multifd_send_state->params[0].pending_job
$2 = 2 //It means the job before MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC has already fail
(gdb) p multifd_send_state->params[0].quit
$3 = true
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ren <ivanren@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <1567044996-2362-1-git-send-email-ivanren@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
There is a race between TCG and accesses to the dirty log:
vCPU thread reader thread
----------------------- -----------------------
TLB check -> slow path
notdirty_mem_write
write to RAM
set dirty flag
clear dirty flag
TLB check -> fast path
read memory
write to RAM
Fortunately, in order to fix it, no change is required to the
vCPU thread. However, the reader thread must delay the read after
the vCPU thread has finished the write. This can be approximated
conservatively by run_on_cpu, which waits for the end of the current
translation block.
A similar technique is used by KVM, which has to do a synchronous TLB
flush after doing a test-and-clear of the dirty-page flags.
Reported-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190814020218.1868-6-quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
This makes easy to debug things because when you want for all threads
to arrive at that semaphore, you know which one your are waiting for.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190814020218.1868-3-quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190814020218.1868-2-quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Rename for better understanding of the code.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190808033155.30162-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Multifd sync will send MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC flag info to destination, add
these bytes to ram_counters record.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ren <ivanren@tencent.com>
Suggested-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <1564464816-21804-4-git-send-email-ivanren@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Limit the speed of multifd migration through common speed limitation
qemu file.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ren <ivanren@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <1564464816-21804-3-git-send-email-ivanren@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Use QEMU_IS_ALIGNED for the check, it would be more consistent with
other align calculations.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190806004648.8659-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
The purpose of the calculation is to find a HostPage which is partially
dirty.
* fixup_start_addr points to the start of the HostPage to discard
* run_start points to the next HostPage to check
While in the middle stage, there would two cases for run_start:
* aligned with HostPage means this is not partially dirty
* not aligned means this is partially dirty
When it is aligned, no work and calculation is necessary. run_start
already points to the start of next HostPage and is ready to continue.
When it is not aligned, the calculation could be simplified with:
* fixup_start_addr = QEMU_ALIGN_DOWN(run_start, host_ratio)
* run_start = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(run_start, host_ratio)
By doing so, run_start always points to the next HostPage to check.
fixup_start_addr always points to the HostPage to discard.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190806004648.8659-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
In postcopy-ram.c, we provide three functions to discard certain
RAMBlock range:
* postcopy_discard_send_init()
* postcopy_discard_send_range()
* postcopy_discard_send_finish()
Currently, we allocate/deallocate PostcopyDiscardState for each RAMBlock
on sending discard information to destination. This is not necessary and
the same data area could be reused for each RAMBlock.
This patch defines PostcopyDiscardState a static variable. By doing so:
1) avoid memory allocation and deallocation to the system
2) avoid potential failure of memory allocation
3) hide some details for their users
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190724010721.2146-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
After cleanup, it would be clear to audience there are two cases
ram_load:
* precopy
* postcopy
And it is not necessary to check postcopy_running on each iteration for
precopy.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190725002023.2335-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
It is not reasonable to continue when version_id mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190722075339.25121-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
RAMBlock->used_length is always passed to migration_bitmap_sync_range(),
which could be retrieved from RAMBlock.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190718012547.16373-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
This means it is not necessary to spare an extra variable to hold this
condition. Use host_offset directly is fine.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190710050814.31344-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Use the same way for run_end to calculate run_start, which saves one
operation.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190710050814.31344-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Since we break the loop when there is no more page to discard, we are
sure the following process would find some page to discard.
It is not necessary to check it again.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190627020822.15485-4-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
When one is equal or bigger then end, it means there is no page to
discard. Just break the loop in this case instead of processing it.
No functional change, just refactor it a little.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190627020822.15485-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
If one equals end, it means we have gone through the whole bitmap.
Use a more restrict check to skip a unnecessary condition.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190627020822.15485-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
When migrate_cancel a multifd migration, if run sequence like this:
[source] [destination]
multifd_send_sync_main[finish]
multifd_recv_thread wait &p->sem_sync
shutdown to_dst_file
detect error from_src_file
send RAM_SAVE_FLAG_EOS[fail] [no chance to run multifd_recv_sync_main]
multifd_load_cleanup
join multifd receive thread forever
will lead destination qemu hung at following stack:
pthread_join
qemu_thread_join
multifd_load_cleanup
process_incoming_migration_co
coroutine_trampoline
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ren <ivanren@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1561468699-9819-4-git-send-email-ivanren@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
When we 'migrate_cancel' a multifd migration, live_migration thread may
hung forever at some points, because of multifd_send_thread has already
exit for socket error:
1. multifd_send_pages may hung at qemu_sem_wait(&multifd_send_state->
channels_ready)
2. multifd_send_sync_main my hung at qemu_sem_wait(&multifd_send_state->
sem_sync)
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ren <ivanren@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <1561468699-9819-3-git-send-email-ivanren@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
---
Remove spurious not needed bits
When we 'migrate_cancel' a multifd migration, live_migration thread may
go into endless loop in multifd_send_pages functions.
Reproduce steps:
(qemu) migrate_set_capability multifd on
(qemu) migrate -d url
(qemu) [wait a while]
(qemu) migrate_cancel
Then may get live_migration 100% cpu usage in following stack:
pthread_mutex_lock
qemu_mutex_lock_impl
multifd_send_pages
multifd_queue_page
ram_save_multifd_page
ram_save_target_page
ram_save_host_page
ram_find_and_save_block
ram_find_and_save_block
ram_save_iterate
qemu_savevm_state_iterate
migration_iteration_run
migration_thread
qemu_thread_start
start_thread
clone
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ren <ivanren@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <1561468699-9819-2-git-send-email-ivanren@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reproduce the problem:
migrate
migrate_cancel
migrate
Error happen for memory migration
The reason as follows:
1. qemu start, ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION] all set to
1 by a series of cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range
2. migration start:ram_init_bitmaps
- memory_global_dirty_log_start: begin log diry
- memory_global_dirty_log_sync: sync dirty bitmap to
ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION]
- migration_bitmap_sync_range: sync ram_list.
dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION] to RAMBlock.bmap
and ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION] is set to zero
3. migration data...
4. migrate_cancel, will stop log dirty
5. migration start:ram_init_bitmaps
- memory_global_dirty_log_start: begin log diry
- memory_global_dirty_log_sync: sync dirty bitmap to
ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION]
- migration_bitmap_sync_range: sync ram_list.
dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION] to RAMBlock.bmap
and ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION] is set to zero
Here RAMBlock.bmap only have new logged dirty pages, don't contain
the whole guest pages.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ren <ivanren@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1563115879-2715-1-git-send-email-ivanren@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Commit 6b6712efcc ('ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock') changes the
parameter of postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram(), while left the document
part untouched.
This patch correct the document and fix two typo by hand.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190715020549.15018-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
By removing the share ram check, qemu is able to migrate
to private destination ram when x-ignore-shared capability
is on. Then we can create multiple destination VMs based
on the same source VM.
This changes the x-ignore-shared migration capability to
work similar to Lai's original bypass-shared-memory
work(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-04/msg00003.html)
which enables kata containers (https://katacontainers.io)
to implement the VM templating feature.
An example usage in kata containers(https://katacontainers.io):
1. Start the source VM:
qemu-system-x86 -m 2G \
-object memory-backend-file,id=mem0,size=2G,share=on,mem-path=/tmpfs/template-memory \
-numa node,memdev=mem0
2. Stop the template VM, set migration x-ignore-shared capability,
migrate "exec:cat>/tmpfs/state", quit it
3. Start target VM:
qemu-system-x86 -m 2G \
-object memory-backend-file,id=mem0,size=2G,share=off,mem-path=/tmpfs/template-memory \
-numa node,memdev=mem0 \
-incoming defer
4. connect to target VM qmp, set migration x-ignore-shared capability,
migrate_incoming "exec:cat /tmpfs/state"
5. create more target VMs repeating 3 and 4
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Yury Kotov <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Jiangshan Lai <laijs@hyper.sh>
Cc: Xu Wang <xu@hyper.sh>
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1560494113-1141-1-git-send-email-tao.peng@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Currently we are doing log_clear() right after log_sync() which mostly
keeps the old behavior when log_clear() was still part of log_sync().
This patch tries to further optimize the migration log_clear() code
path to split huge log_clear()s into smaller chunks.
We do this by spliting the whole guest memory region into memory
chunks, whose size is decided by MigrationState.clear_bitmap_shift (an
example will be given below). With that, we don't do the dirty bitmap
clear operation on the remote node (e.g., KVM) when we fetch the dirty
bitmap, instead we explicitly clear the dirty bitmap for the memory
chunk for each of the first time we send a page in that chunk.
Here comes an example.
Assuming the guest has 64G memory, then before this patch the KVM
ioctl KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG will be a single one covering 64G memory.
If after the patch, let's assume when the clear bitmap shift is 18,
then the memory chunk size on x86_64 will be 1UL<<18 * 4K = 1GB. Then
instead of sending a big 64G ioctl, we'll send 64 small ioctls, each
of the ioctl will cover 1G of the guest memory. For each of the 64
small ioctls, we'll only send if any of the page in that small chunk
was going to be sent right away.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190603065056.25211-12-peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap() has one RAMBlock* as
parameter, which means that it must be with RCU read lock held
already. Taking it again inside seems redundant. Removing it.
Instead comment on the functions about the RCU read lock.
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190603065056.25211-2-peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In case we gets a queued page, the order of block is interrupted. We may
not rely on the complete_round flag to say we have already searched the
whole blocks on the list.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190605010828.6969-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Notification from recv thread is not ordered, which means we may be
notified by one MultiFDRecvParams but adjust packet_num for another.
Move the adjustment after we are sure each recv thread are sync-ed.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190604023540.26532-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
When we are not in the last_stage, we need to update the cache if page
is not the same.
Currently this procedure is scattered in two places and mixed with
encoding status check.
This patch extract this general step out to make the code a little bit
easy to read.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190610004159.20966-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
On receiving RAM_SAVE_FLAG_EOS, multifd_recv_sync_main() is called to
synchronize receive threads. Current synchronization mechanism is to wait
for each channel's sem_sync semaphore. This semaphore is triggered by a
packet with MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC flag. While in current implementation, we
don't do multifd_send_sync_main() to send such packet when
blk_mig_bulk_active() is true.
This will leads to the receive threads won't notify
multifd_recv_sync_main() by sem_sync. And multifd_recv_sync_main() will
always wait there.
[Note]: normal migration test works, while didn't test the
blk_mig_bulk_active() case. Since not sure how to produce this
situation.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190612014337.11255-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
'postocpy' should be 'postcopy'.
CC: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190525062832.18009-1-liq3ea@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
During migration, we would sync bitmap from ram_list.dirty_memory to
RAMBlock.bmap in cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap().
Since we set RAMBlock.bmap and ram_list.dirty_memory both to all 1, this
means at the first round this sync is meaningless and is a duplicated
work.
Leaving RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating would have a side effect on
migration_dirty_pages, since it is calculated from the result of
cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(). To keep it right, we need to
set migration_dirty_pages to 0 in ram_state_init().
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Besides init and destroy, MultiFDSendParams.sem_sync is not really used.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190510233729.15554-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Since the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock
in commit 6b6712e, it's better to update the comments about them.
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Message-Id: <1555311089-18610-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
We can eliminate to pass 0.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190430034412.12935-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Coverity points out (CID 1400442) that in this code:
if (packet->pages_alloc > p->pages->allocated) {
multifd_pages_clear(p->pages);
multifd_pages_init(packet->pages_alloc);
}
we free p->pages in multifd_pages_clear() but continue to
use it in the following code. We also leak memory, because
multifd_pages_init() returns the pointer to a new MultiFDPages_t
struct but we are ignoring its return value.
Fix both of these bugs by adding the missing assignment of
the newly created struct to p->pages.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190409151830.6024-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
I found upstream codes conflict with COLO and lead to crash,
and I located to this patch:
commit 386a907b37
Author: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Date: Tue Dec 11 16:24:49 2018 +0800
migration: use bitmap_mutex in migration_bitmap_clear_dirty
My colleague Wei's patch add bitmap_mutex in migration_bitmap_clear_dirty,
but COLO didn't initialize the bitmap_mutex. So we always get an error
when COLO start up. like that:
qemu-system-x86_64: util/qemu-thread-posix.c:64: qemu_mutex_lock_impl: Assertion `mutex->initialized' failed.
This patch add the bitmap_mutex initialize and destroy in COLO
lifecycle.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190329222951.28945-1-chen.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Add some padding.
MultifdInit_t is padded to 64 bytes.
MultiFDPacket_t is padded to 320bytes (64 * 5).
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
We moved from 64KB to 512KB, as it makes less locking contention
without any downside in testing.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
This way we can change the packet size in the future and everything
will work. We choose an arbitrary big number (100 times configured
size) as a limit about how big we will reallocate.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Libvirt don't want to expose (and explain it). From now on we measure
the number of packages in bytes instead of pages, so it is the same
independently of architecture. We choose the page size of x86.
Notice that in the following patch we make this variable.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
