memory_region_set_offset() will be going away soon, so don't use it.
Use an alias instead.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Add a type and methods for manipulating a list of disjoint I/O ports,
used in some older hardware devices.
Based on original patch by Richard Henderson.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Serial and parallel devices created with -device are not reported in
the PIIX4 configuration space, and are hence not picked up by the DSDT.
This upsets Windows, which hides them altogether from the guest.
To avoid this, check at the end of machine initialization whether the
corresponding I/O ports have been registered. The new function in
ioport.c does this; this also requires a tweak to isa_unassign_ioport.
I left the comment in piix4_pm_initfn since the registers I moved do
seem to match the 82371AB datasheet. There are some quirks though.
We are setting this bit:
"Device 8 EIO Enable (EIO_EN_DEV8)—R/W. 1=Enable PCI access to the
device 8 enabled I/O ranges to be claimed by PIIX4 and forwarded
to the ISA/EIO bus. 0=Disable. The LPT_MON_EN must be set to enable
the decode."
but not LPT_MON_EN (bit 18 at 50h):
LPT Port Enable (LPT_MON_EN)—R/W. 1=Enable accesses to parallel
port address range (LPT_DEC_SEL) to generate a device 8 (parallel
port) decode event. 0=Disable.
We're also setting the LPT_DEC_SEL field (that's the 0x60 written to
63h) to 11, which means reserved, rather than to 01 (378h-37Fh).
Likewise we're not setting SA_MON_EN, SB_MON_EN (respectively bit 14
and bit 16 at address 50h) for the serial ports. However, we're setting
COMA_DEC_SEL and COMB_DEC_SEL correctly, unlike the corresponding register
for the parallel port.
All these fields are left as they are, since they are probably only
meant to be used in the DSDT.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
The current ioport callbacks are not type-safe, in that they accept an "opaque"
pointer as an argument whose type must match the argument to the registration
function; this is not checked by the compiler.
This patch adds an alternative that is type-safe. Instead of an opaque
argument, both registation and the callback use a new IOPort type. The
callback then uses container_of() to access its main structures.
Currently the old and new methods exist side by side; once the old way is gone,
we can also save a bunch of memory since the new method requires one pointer
per ioport instead of 6.
Acked-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
In the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list.
The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something
like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input
and cope with it.
This reverts commit 99a0949b72.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
The CPU state parameter is not used, remove it and adjust callers. Now we
can compile ioport.c once for all targets.
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Using int for cpu_{in, out}[bwl] is inconsistent with other part
because for address or value, uintN_t is used by other qemu part.
At least, softmmu, CPU{Read, Write}MemoryFunc, pci, target_phys_addr_t
and the callers of cpu_{in, out}[bwl]().
This patch removes the inconsistency.
IO port has its own address space so define pio_addr_t as uint32_t
because PCI io space width is 32bit.
And use uint{32, 16, 8}_t for ioport value.
Changing signedness of value might cause subtle issue. However
only a suspicious caller is kvm_handle_io() which is ok. And other callers
pass unsigned value in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: Stuart Brady <sdbrady@ntlworld.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Cc: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
