The npcm7xx_pwm-test can take quite a while when running with
--enable-debug on a loaded system. The tests here are quite
repetitive - by default it should be fine if we only execute
some of them and only execute all when running in slow testing mode.
Message-ID: <20231215143524.49241-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The npcm7xx_pwm-test produces a lot of output at V=1, which
means that on our CI tests the log files exceed the gitlab
500KB limit. Suppress the messages about exactly what is
being tested unless at V=2 and above.
This follows the pattern we use with qom-test.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230209135047.1753081-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
g_strdup_printf() allocated memory for path, we should free it with
g_free() when no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220531080921.4704-1-linmq006@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Since commit a2ce7dbd91 ("meson: convert tests/qtest to meson"),
libqtest.h is under libqos/ directory, while libqtest.c is still in
qtest/. Move back to its original location to avoid mixing with libqos/.
Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
In the glib API, the distinction between g_assert() and
g_assert_true() is that the former is for "bug, terminate the
application" and the latter is for "test check, on failure either
terminate or just mark the testcase as failed". For QEMU, g_assert()
is always fatal, so code can assume that if the assertion fails
execution does not proceed, but this is not true of g_assert_true().
In npcm7xx_pwm-test, the pwm_index() and pwm_module_index() functions
include some assertions that are just guarding against possible bugs
in the test code that might lead us to out-of-bounds array accesses.
These should use g_assert() because they aren't part of what the test
is testing and the code does not correctly handle the case where the
condition was false.
This fixes some Coverity issues where Coverity knows that
g_assert_true() can continue when the condition is false and
complains about the possible array overrun at various callsites.
Fixes: Coverity CID 1442340, 1442341, 1442343, 1442344, 1442345, 1442346
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210505135516.21097-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This patch adds testing of PWM fan RPMs in the existing npcm7xx pwm
test. It tests whether the MFT module can measure correct fan values
for a PWM fan in NPCM7XX boards.
Reviewed-by: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tyrone Ting <kfting@nuvoton.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210311180855.149764-6-wuhaotsh@google.com
[PMM: fixed format strings for printing uint64_t]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Fix potential overflow problem when calculating pwm_duty.
1. Ensure p->cmr and p->cnr to be from [0,65535], according to the
hardware specification.
2. Changed duty to uint32_t. However, since MAX_DUTY * (p->cmr+1)
can excceed UINT32_MAX, we convert them to uint64_t in computation
and converted them back to uint32_t.
(duty is guaranteed to be <= MAX_DUTY so it won't overflow.)
Fixes: CID 1442342
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20210127011142.2122790-1-wuhaotsh@google.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The pwm_qom_get function didn't free "response", which caused an indirect
memory leak. So use qobject_unref() to fix it.
ASAN shows memory leak stack:
Indirect leak of 74160000 byte(s) in 18000 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f96e2f79d4e in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x112d4e)
#1 0x7f96e2d98a50 in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x55a50)
#2 0x556313112180 in qdict_new ../qobject/qdict.c:30
#3 0x556313115bca in parse_object ../qobject/json-parser.c:318
#4 0x556313117810 in parse_value ../qobject/json-parser.c:546
#5 0x556313117bda in json_parser_parse ../qobject/json-parser.c:580
#6 0x55631310fe67 in json_message_process_token ../qobject/json-streamer.c:92
#7 0x5563131210b7 in json_lexer_feed_char ../qobject/json-lexer.c:313
#8 0x556313121662 in json_lexer_feed ../qobject/json-lexer.c:350
#9 0x5563131101e9 in json_message_parser_feed ../qobject/json-streamer.c:121
#10 0x5563130cb81e in qmp_fd_receive ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:614
#11 0x5563130cba2b in qtest_qmp_receive_dict ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:636
#12 0x5563130cb939 in qtest_qmp_receive ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:624
#13 0x5563130cbe0d in qtest_vqmp ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:715
#14 0x5563130cc40f in qtest_qmp ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:756
#15 0x5563130c5623 in pwm_qom_get ../tests/qtest/npcm7xx_pwm-test.c:180
#16 0x5563130c595e in pwm_get_duty ../tests/qtest/npcm7xx_pwm-test.c:210
#17 0x5563130c7529 in test_toggle ../tests/qtest/npcm7xx_pwm-test.c:447
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20210115075634.717909-1-ganqixin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Gan Qixin <ganqixin@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
We add a qtest for the PWM in the previous patch. It proves it works as
expected.
Reviewed-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tyrone Ting <kfting@nuvoton.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210108190945.949196-6-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
