As observed by Philippe, the multifd_ram_unfill_packet() function
currently leaves the MultiFDPacket structure with mixed
endianness. This is harmless, but ultimately not very clean.
Stop touching the received packet and do the necessary work using
stack variables instead.
While here tweak the error strings and fix the space before
semicolons. Also remove the "100 times bigger" comment because it's
just one possible explanation for a size mismatch and it doesn't even
match the code.
CC: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
The methods are defined at module_init time and don't ever
change. Make them const.
Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
In preparation for adding new payload types to multifd, move most of
the no-compression code into multifd-nocomp.c. Let's try to keep a
semblance of layering by not mixing general multifd control flow with
the details of transmitting pages of ram.
There are still some pieces leftover, namely the p->normal, p->zero,
etc variables that we use for zero page tracking and the packet
allocation which is heavily dependent on the ram code.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
