o allow to use Big5 (a Chinese encoding used in Taiwan) as a client
encoding. In this case the server side encoding should be EUC_TW
o add EUC_TW and Big5 test cases to the regression and the mb test
(contributed by Jonah Kuo)
o fix mistake in include/mb/pg_wchar.h. An encoding id for EUC_TW was
not correct (was 3 and now is 4)
o update documents (doc/README.mb and README.mb.jp)
o update psql helpfile (bin/psql/psqlHelp.h)
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii@sra.co.jp
+
+ Wed Jan 27 12:42:22 CET 1999
+
+ - Fixed bug that caused ecpg to lose 'goto' information.
+ - Set ecpg version to 2.4.7
+
+ Fri Jan 29 18:03:52 CET 1999
+
+ - Fixed bug that caused 'enum' to be rejected in pure C code.
+ - Fixed bug that caused function names to be translated to lower case.
+ - Set ecpg version to 2.4.8
+
The following patch does two things.
- Clarifies what the effect of allowing users to add new users (Thet
become super-users.)
- Makes the default database for the new user if they are not allowed
to and the user agrees to create it.
Included patches fix a portability problem of unsetenv() used in
6.4.2 multi-byte support. unsetenv() is only avaliable on FreeBSD and
Linux so I decided to replace with putenv().
This implements some of the JDBC2 methods, fixes a bug introduced into the
JDBC1 portion of the driver, and introduces a new example, showing how to
use the CORBA ORB thats in Java2 with JDBC.
The Tar file contains the new files, the diff the changes to the others.
CHANGELOG is separate as I forgot to make a .orig ;-)
so that fetching an attribute value needs only one SearchSysCacheTuple call
instead of two redundant searches. This speeds up a large SELECT by about
ten percent, and probably will help GROUP BY and SELECT DISTINCT too.
was causing it not to detect out-of-range float values, as evidenced by
failure of float8 regression test. I corrected that logic and also
modified expected float8 results to account for new error message
generated for out-of-range inputs.
Pawel Pierscionek [pawel@astercity.net] reported about the
following case 1([SQL] drop table in pgsql).
Michael Contzen [mcontzen@dohle.com] reported about the
following case 2(PL/PGSQL bug using aggregates).
You can find it from pgsql-hackers archive.
1. PL/pgSQL can't execute UTILITY commands.
SPI_prepare() doesn't copy(save) the utilityStmt member of
Query type nodes,because copyObject() is not implemented
for nodes of (Create/Destroy etc)Stmt type.
2. Aggregates in PL/pgSQL cause wrong results.
...
It's a list including Aggreg type nodes which exist in
TargetList(i.e Aggreg type nodes are common to aggs
member list and TargetList).
AFAIC the common pointer is not copied to the same
pointer by copyObject() function.
In my patch I reconstruct aggs member node from
new(copied) Agg type node.
Is it proper to use set_agg_tlist_references() function to
reconstruct aggs member node for Agg type nodes ?
Thanks.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp
elements prior to CREATEing new ones. It is under control of the -c
command line option (with the default being status quo).
The DROP TRIGGER portion still needs implementation. Anyone able to
help clarify what exactly the CREATE TRIGGER portion does so I can fix
this?
Again, I have tried this with tables/indexes/sequences, but do not
have other schema elements in my database. As a result, I am not 100%
convinced that I got the syntax correct in all cases (but think I did,
nonetheless). If anyone can check the other cases, I'd appreciate it.
Cheers,
Brook
[I added manual page and sgml additions for the new -c option.]
a field was labelled as a primary key, the system automatically
created a unique index on the field. This patch extends it so
that the index has the indisprimary field set. You can pull a list
of primary keys with the followiing select.
SELECT pg_class.relname, pg_attribute.attname
FROM pg_class, pg_attribute, pg_index
WHERE pg_class.oid = pg_attribute.attrelid AND
pg_class.oid = pg_index.indrelid AND
pg_index.indkey[0] = pg_attribute.attnum AND
pg_index.indisunique = 't';
There is nothing in this patch that modifies the template database to
set the indisprimary attribute for system tables. Should they be
changed or should we only be concerned with user tables?
D'Arcy
Bruce Momjian