with expression_tree_walker-based code. The former failed to cope with
expressions containing SubLinks, and the latter returned TRUE for both
SubLinks and Aggrefs (cut-and-paste bug?). There is a lot more scope for
using expression_tree_walker in this module, but I'll restrain myself
until the 6.6 split occurs from touching not-demonstrably-broken code.
is parse_aggs.c. This fixes its failure to cope with (at least) CaseExpr
and ArrayRef nodes, which is the reason why both of these fail in 6.5:
select coalesce(f1,0) from int4_tbl group by f1;
ERROR: Illegal use of aggregates or non-group column in target list
select sentence.words[0] from sentence group by sentence.words[0];
ERROR: Illegal use of aggregates or non-group column in target list
The array case still fails, but at least it's not parse_agg's fault
anymore ... considering that we now support CASE officially, I think
it's important to fix the first example ...
will gradually replace all of the boilerplate tree-walk-recursion code that
currently exists in O(N) slightly different forms in N subroutines.
I've had it with adding missing cases to these subroutines...
August 1994 draft standard.
Use the ecpg support libraries to write the CLI interface?
Date and Darwen claim that CLI is a more modern and flexible approach...
special hack to ensure it would close its output file even after failure
due to elog(ERROR) partway through the copy. This is now unnecessary
because fd.c takes care of cleaning up open files at transaction abort;
worse, after fd.c closed the file copy.c would try to do so *again* at
the start of the next COPY command. This would result in havoc in most
implementations of stdio library.
tlist and qual are NULL. It ought to handle these the same as the cases
where tlist contains only constant expressions, ie, be willing to generate
a Result-node plan. This did not use to matter, but it does now because
union_planner will flatten the tlist when aggregates are present. Thus,
'select count(1) from table' now causes query_planner to be given a null
tlist, and to duplicate 6.4's behavior we need it to give back a Result
plan rather than refusing the query. 6.4 was arguably doing the Wrong
Thing for this query, but I'm not going to open a semantics issue right
before 6.5 release ... can revisit that problem later.
returned NULL, which it will do in some cases where an elog(ERROR) would
probably be more appropriate. For the moment, generate a not-very-
informative error message rather than proceeding to certain coredump.
Probably ought to think about making query_planner elog instead of
returning NULL, but this is at least a safe change for now.
pointer to palloc'd but uninitialized memory. This is not cool; anyone looking
at the returned 'tuple' would at best coredump and at worst behave in a
bizarre and irreproducible way. Fix it to return a predictable value,
namely a correctly-set-up palloc'd tuple containing zero attributes.
I believe this fix is both safe and critical.
this one could be useful for people experiencing out-of-memory crashes while
executing queries which retrieve or use a very large number of tuples.
The problem happens when storage is allocated for functions results used in
a large query, for example:
select upper(name) from big_table;
select big_table.array[1] from big_table;
select count(upper(name)) from big_table;
This patch is a dirty hack that fixes the out-of-memory problem for the most
common cases, like the above ones. It is not the final solution for the
problem but it can work for some people, so I'm posting it.
The patch should be safe because all changes are under #ifdef. Furthermore
the feature can be enabled or disabled at runtime by the `free_tuple_memory'
options in the pg_options file. The option is disabled by default and must
be explicitly enabled at runtime to have any effect.
To enable the patch add the follwing line to Makefile.custom:
CUSTOM_COPT += -DFREE_TUPLE_MEMORY
To enable the option at runtime add the following line to pg_option:
free_tuple_memory=1
Massimo
/*
* Read above about cases when !ItemIdIsUsed(Citemid)
* (child item is removed)... Due to the fact that
* at the moment we don't remove unuseful part of
* update-chain, it's possible to get too old
* parent row here. Like as in the case which
* caused this problem, we stop shrinking here.
* I could try to find real parent row but want
* not to do it because of real solution will
* be implemented anyway, latter, and we are too
* close to 6.5 release. - vadim 06/11/99
*/
if (Ptp.t_data->t_xmax != tp.t_data->t_xmin)
...
