expression_returns_set() used to short-circuit its recursion upon
seeing certain node types, such as DistinctExpr, that it knew the
executor did not support set-valued arguments for. That was never
inherent, though, just a reflection of laziness in execQual.c.
With the new implementation of SRFs there is no reason to think
that any scalar-valued expression node could not have a set-valued
subexpression, except for AggRefs and WindowFuncs where we know there
is a parser check rejecting it. And indeed, the shortcut causes
unexpected failures for cases such as a SRF underneath DistinctExpr,
because the planner stops looking for SRFs too soon.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5259.1497044025@sss.pgh.pa.us
In commits 2f5c9d9c9 and ab0289651 we invented an abstraction layer
to insulate catalog manipulations from direct heap update calls.
But evidently some patches that hadn't landed in-tree at that point
didn't get the memo completely. Fix a couple of direct calls to
simple_heap_delete to use CatalogTupleDelete instead; these appear
to have been added in commits 7c4f52409 and 7b504eb28. This change is
purely cosmetic ATM, but there's no point in having an abstraction layer
if we allow random code to break it.
Masahiko Sawada and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDOPRSVcwbnCN3Y1n_68ATyTspsU6=ygtHz_uY0VcdZ8A@mail.gmail.com
Table partitioning, introduced in commit f0e44751d7, added a new
relkind - RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Update a couple of places in
PL/pgSQL to handle it. Specifically plpgsql_parse_cwordtype() and
build_row_from_class() needed updating in order to make table%ROWTYPE
and table.col%TYPE work for partitioned tables.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Amit Langote.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUnNOKN8sLML9jUzxecALWpEXK3a3W7y0PgFR4%2Buhgc%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com
Table partitioning, introduced in commit f0e44751d7, added a new
relkind - RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Update
RemoveRoleFromObjectPolicy() to handle it, otherwise DROP OWNED BY
will fail if the role has any RLS policies referring to partitioned
tables.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Amit Langote.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUnNOKN8sLML9jUzxecALWpEXK3a3W7y0PgFR4%2Buhgc%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com
When we reimplemented SRFs in commit 69f4b9c85, our initial choice was
to allow the behavior to vary from historical practice in cases where a
SRF call appeared within a conditional-execution construct (currently,
only CASE or COALESCE). But that was controversial to begin with, and
subsequent discussion has resulted in a consensus that it's better to
throw an error instead of executing the query differently from before,
so long as we can provide a reasonably clear error message and a way to
rewrite the query.
Hence, add a parser mechanism to allow detection of such cases during
parse analysis. The mechanism just requires storing, in the ParseState,
a pointer to the set-returning FuncExpr or OpExpr most recently emitted
by parse analysis. Then the parsing functions for CASE and COALESCE can
detect the presence of a SRF in their arguments by noting whether this
pointer changes while analyzing their arguments. Furthermore, if it does,
it provides a suitable error cursor location for the complaint. (This
means that if there's more than one SRF in the arguments, the error will
point at the last one to be analyzed not the first. While connoisseurs of
parsing behavior might find that odd, it's unlikely the average user would
ever notice.)
While at it, we can also provide more specific error messages than before
about some pre-existing restrictions, such as no-SRFs-within-aggregates.
Also, reject at parse time cases where a NULLIF or IS DISTINCT FROM
construct would need to return a set. We've never supported that, but the
restriction is depended on in more subtle ways now, so it seems wise to
detect it at the start.
Also, provide some documentation about how to rewrite a SRF-within-CASE
query using a custom wrapper SRF.
It turns out that the information_schema.user_mapping_options view
contained an instance of exactly the behavior we're now forbidding; but
rewriting it makes it more clear and safer too.
initdb forced because of user_mapping_options change.
Patch by me, with error message suggestions from Alvaro Herrera and
Andres Freund, pursuant to a complaint from Regina Obe.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/000001d2d5de$d8d66170$8a832450$@pcorp.us
The exact numbers don't matter, since they are examples, but it was
looking quite dated.
For the target version, we now automatically substitute the current
major version. The updated example source version should be good for a
couple of years.
Table partitioning, introduced in commit f0e44751d7, added a new
relkind - RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Update relation_is_updatable() to
handle it. Specifically, partitioned tables and simple views built on
top of them are updatable.
This affects the SQL-callable functions pg_relation_is_updatable() and
pg_column_is_updatable(), and the views information_schema.views and
information_schema.columns.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXnbiFkMXgF4Ez1pmM2c-tS1z33bSq7OGbw7QQhHov%2B6Q%40mail.gmail.com
Previously, you could write _null_ in a BKI DATA line for a column that's
supposed to be NOT NULL and initdb would let it pass, probably breaking
subsequent accesses to the row. No doubt the original coding overlooked
this simple sanity check because in the beginning we didn't have any way
to mark catalog columns NOT NULL at initdb time.
This will not work on restore, but it will allow dumping out pg_catalog
for research and documentation.
Reported-by: Neil Anderson <neil.t.anderson@gmail.com>
Bug: #14701
ExecInitModifyTable() thought there was a plan per partition, but no,
there's only one. The problem had escaped detection so far because there
would only be visible misbehavior if there were a SubPlan (not an InitPlan)
in the quals being duplicated for each partition. However, valgrind
detected a bogus memory access in test cases added by commit 4f7a95be2,
and investigation of that led to discovery of the bug. The additional
test case added here crashes without the patch.
Patch by Amit Langote, test case by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10974.1497227727@sss.pgh.pa.us
During pg_upgrade's restore run, all relfilenode choices should be
overridden by commands in the dump script. If we ever find ourselves
choosing a relfilenode in the ordinary way, someone blew it. Likewise for
pg_type OIDs. Since pg_upgrade might well succeed anyway, if there happens
not to be a conflict during the regression test run, we need assertions
here to keep us on the straight and narrow.
We might someday be able to remove the assertion in GetNewRelFileNode,
if pg_upgrade is rewritten to remove its assumption that old and new
relfilenodes always match. But it's hard to see how to get rid of the
pg_type OID constraint, since those OIDs are embedded in user tables
in some cases.
Back-patch as far as 9.5, because of the risk of back-patches breaking
something here even if it works in HEAD. I'd prefer to go back further,
but 9.4 fails both assertions due to get_rel_infos()'s use of a temporary
table. We can't use the later-branch solution of a CTE for compatibility
reasons (cf commit 5d16332e9), and it doesn't seem worth inventing some
other way to do the query. (I did check, by dint of changing the Asserts
to elog(WARNING), that there are no other cases of unwanted OID assignments
during 9.4's regression test run.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19785.1497215827@sss.pgh.pa.us
It's not necessary for it to do that, since OWNED BY requires only ordinary
catalog updates and doesn't affect future sequence values. And pg_upgrade
needs to use OWNED BY without having it change the sequence's relfilenode.
Commit 3d79013b9 broke this by making all forms of ALTER SEQUENCE change
the relfilenode; that seems to be the explanation for the hard-to-reproduce
buildfarm failures we've been seeing since then.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19785.1497215827@sss.pgh.pa.us
The original code only added ICU_CFLAGS to the backend build. But it is
also needed for building external modules that include pg_locale.h. So
add it to the global CPPFLAGS. (This is only relevant if ICU is not in
a compiler default path, so it apparently hasn't bitten many.)
When a table sync worker is in waiting state and the subscription table
entry is removed because of a concurrent subscription refresh, the
worker could be left orphaned. To avoid that, explicitly stop the
worker when the pg_subscription_rel entry is removed.
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
generateSerialExtraStmts() was sloppy about handling the case where
SEQUENCE NAME is given with a not-schema-qualified name. It was generating
a CreateSeqStmt with an unqualified sequence name, and an AlterSeqStmt
whose "owned_by" DefElem contained a T_String Value with a null string
pointer in the schema-name position. The generated nextval() argument was
also underqualified. This accidentally failed to fail at runtime, but only
so long as the current default creation namespace at runtime is the right
namespace. That's bogus; the parse-time transformation is supposed to be
inserting the right schema name in all cases, so as to avoid any possible
skew in that selection. I'm not sure this could fail in pg_dump's usage,
but it's still wrong; we have had real bugs in this area before adopting
the policy that parse_utilcmd.c should generate only fully-qualified
auxiliary commands. A slightly lesser problem, which is what led me to
notice this in the first place, is that pprint() dumped core on the
AlterSeqStmt because of the bogus T_String.
Noted while poking into the open problem with ALTER SEQUENCE breaking
pg_upgrade.
The new partitioned table capability added a new relkind, namely
RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Update fireRIRrules() to apply RLS
policies on RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE as it does RELKIND_RELATION.
In addition, add RLS regression test coverage for partitioned tables.
Issue raised by Fakhroutdinov Evgenievich and patch by Mike Palmiotto.
Regression test editorializing by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/20170601065959.1486.69906@wrigleys.postgresql.org
This reverts commit 56b6ef893fee9e9bf47d927a02f4d1ea911f4d9c and instead
makes vcregress.pl parse out PROVE_FLAGS from a command line argument
when doing a TAP test, thus making it consistent with the makefile
treatment.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c26a7416-2fb9-34ab-7991-618c922f896e%402ndquadrant.com
Backpatch to 9.4 like previous patch.
When a table is removed from a subscription before the tablesync worker
could start, this would previously result in an error when reading
pg_subscription_rel. Now we just ignore this.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
If you accidentally pass a host name in the hostaddr option, e.g.
hostaddr=localhost, you get an error like:
psql: could not translate host name "localhost" to address: Name or service not known
That's a bit confusing, because it implies that we tried to look up
"localhost" in DNS, but it failed. To make it more clear that we tried to
parse "localhost" as a numeric network address, change the message to:
psql: could not parse network address "localhost": Name or service not known
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/10badbc6-4d5a-a769-623a-f7ada43e14dd@iki.fi
Previously the exit handling was only able to exit from within the
main loop, and not from within the backend code it calls. Fix that by
using the standard die() SIGTERM handler, and adding the necessary
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() call.
This requires adding yet another process-type-specific branch to
ProcessInterrupts(), which hints that we probably should generalize
that handling. But that's work for another day.
Author: Petr Jelinek
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fe072153-babd-3b5d-8052-73527a6eb657@2ndquadrant.com
Since 7c4f52409a8c (merged in v10), a shutdown master is reported as
FATAL: unexpected result after CommandComplete: server closed the connection unexpectedly
by walsender. It used to be
LOG: replication terminated by primary server
FATAL: could not send end-of-streaming message to primary: no COPY in progress
while the old message clearly is not perfect, it's definitely better
than what's reported now.
The change comes from the attempt to handle finished COPYs without
erroring out, needed for the new logical replication, which wasn't
needed before.
There's probably better ways to handle this, but for now just
explicitly check for a closed connection.
Author: Petr Jelinek
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f7c7dd08-855c-e4ed-41f4-d064a6c0665a@2ndquadrant.com
Backpatch: -
