2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
# Rules for documentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are the rules for the care and feeding of wikiheaders.pl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## No style guide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When adding or editing documentation, we don't (currently) have a style guide
|
|
|
|
for what it should read like, so try to make it consistent with the rest of
|
|
|
|
the existing text. It generally should read more like technical reference
|
|
|
|
manuals and not sound conversational in tone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of these rules are about how to make sure the documentation works on
|
|
|
|
a _technical_ level, as scripts need to parse it, and there are a few simple
|
|
|
|
rules we need to obey to cooperate with those scripts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## The wiki and headers share the same text.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a massive Perl script (`build-scripts/wikiheaders.pl`, hereafter
|
2024-06-19 17:13:46 +03:00
|
|
|
referred to as "wikiheaders") that can read both the wiki and the public
|
2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
headers, and move changes in one across to the other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you prefer to use the wiki, go ahead and edit there. If you prefer to use
|
|
|
|
your own text editor, or command line tools to batch-process text, etc, you
|
|
|
|
can [clone the wiki as a git repo](https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdlwiki) and
|
|
|
|
work locally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Don't taunt wikiheaders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The script isn't magic; it's a massive pile of Regular Expressions and not
|
|
|
|
a full C or markdown parser. While it isn't _fragile_, if you try to do clever
|
|
|
|
things, you might confuse it. This is to the benefit of documentation, though,
|
|
|
|
where we would rather you not do surprising things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## We _sort of_ write in Doxygen format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To document a symbol, we use something that looks like Doxygen (and Javadoc)
|
|
|
|
standard comment format:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* This is a function that does something.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* It can be used for frozzling bobbles. Be aware that the Frozulator module
|
|
|
|
* _must_ be initialized before calling this.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* \param frozzlevel The amount of frozzling to perform.
|
|
|
|
* \param color What color bobble to frozzle. 0 is red, 1 is green.
|
|
|
|
* \returns the number of bobbles that were actually frozzled, -1 on error.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* \threadsafety Do not call this from two threads at once, or the bobbles
|
|
|
|
* won't all frozzle correctly!
|
|
|
|
*
|
2024-05-15 19:46:12 +03:00
|
|
|
* \since This function is available since SDL 7.3.1.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
* \sa SDL_DoSomethingElse
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-05-18 02:52:36 +03:00
|
|
|
extern SDL_DECLSPEC int SDLCALL SDL_DoSomething(int frozzlevel, int color);
|
2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note the `/**` at the start of the comment. That's a "Doxygen-style" comment,
|
|
|
|
and wikiheaders will treat this differently than a comment with one `*`, as
|
|
|
|
this signifies that this is not just a comment, but _documentation_.
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-06 22:09:29 +03:00
|
|
|
These comments _must_ start in the first column of the line, or wikiheaders
|
|
|
|
will ignore them, even with the "/**" start (we should improve the script
|
|
|
|
someday to handle this, but currently this is a requirement).
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
We do _not_ parse every magic Doxygen tag, and we don't parse them in `@param`
|
|
|
|
format. The goal here was to mostly coexist with people that might want
|
|
|
|
to run Doxygen on the SDL headers, not to build Doxygen from scratch. That
|
|
|
|
being said, compatibility with Doxygen is not a hard requirement here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wikiheaders uses these specific tags to turn this comment into a (hopefully)
|
|
|
|
well-formatted wiki page, and also can generate manpages and books in LaTeX
|
|
|
|
format from it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Text markup in the headers is _always_ done in Markdown format! But less is
|
|
|
|
more: try not to markup text more than necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-16 19:57:36 +03:00
|
|
|
## Doxygen tags we support:
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-22 03:06:36 +03:00
|
|
|
- `\brief one-line description` (Not required, and wikiheaders will remove tag).
|
2024-05-16 19:57:36 +03:00
|
|
|
- `\param varname description` (One for each function/macro parameter)
|
|
|
|
- `\returns description` (One for each function, don't use on `void` returns).
|
|
|
|
- `\sa` (each of these get tucked into a "See Also" section on the wiki)
|
|
|
|
- `\since This function is available since SDL 3.0.0.` (one per Doxygen comment)
|
|
|
|
- `\threadsafety description` (one per function/macro).
|
2024-05-22 03:07:49 +03:00
|
|
|
- `\deprecated description` (one per symbol, if symbol is deprecated!)
|
2024-05-16 19:57:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Doxygen things might exist in the headers, but they aren't understood
|
|
|
|
by wikiheaders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Use Markdown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The wiki also supports MediaWiki format, but we are transitioning away from it.
|
|
|
|
The headers always use Markdown. If you're editing the wiki from a git clone,
|
|
|
|
just make .md files and the wiki will know what to do with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Most things in the headers can be documented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wikiheaders understands functions, typedefs, structs/unions/enums, `#defines`
|
|
|
|
... basically most of what makes up a C header. Just slap a Doxygen-style
|
|
|
|
comment in front of most things and it'll work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Defines right below typedefs and functions bind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any `#define` directly below a function or non-struct/union/enum typedef is
|
|
|
|
considered part of that declaration. This happens to work well with how our
|
|
|
|
headers work, as these defines tend to be bitflags and such that are related
|
|
|
|
to that symbol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wikiheaders will include those defines in the syntax section of the wiki
|
|
|
|
page, and generate stub pages for each define that simply says "please refer
|
|
|
|
to (The Actual Symbol You Care About)" with a link. It will also pull in
|
|
|
|
any blank lines and most preprocessor directives for the syntax text, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes an unrelated define, by itself, just happens to be right below one
|
|
|
|
of these symbols in the header. The easiest way to deal with this is either
|
|
|
|
to document that define with a Doxygen-style comment, if it makes sense to do
|
|
|
|
so, or just add a normal C comment right above it if not, so wikiheaders
|
|
|
|
doesn't bind it to the previous symbol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Don't document the `SDL_test*.h` headers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are in the public headers but they aren't really considered public APIs.
|
|
|
|
They live in a separate library that doesn't, or at least probably shouldn't,
|
|
|
|
ship to end users. As such, we don't want it documented on the wiki.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For now, we do this by not having any Doxygen-style comments in these files.
|
|
|
|
Please keep it that way! If you want to document these headers, just don't
|
|
|
|
use the magic two-`*` comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## The first line is the summary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first line of a piece of documentation is meant to be a succinct
|
|
|
|
description. This is what Doxygen would call the `\brief` tag. wikiheaders
|
|
|
|
will split this text out until the first period (end of sentence!), and when
|
|
|
|
word wrapping, shuffle the overflow into a new paragraph below it.
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Split paragraphs with a blank line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And don't indent them at all (indenting in Markdown is treated as preformatted
|
|
|
|
text).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wikiheaders will wordwrap header comments so they fit in 80 columns, so if you
|
|
|
|
don't leave a blank line between paragraphs, they will smush into a single
|
|
|
|
block of text when wordwrapping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Don't worry about word wrapping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't word-wrap your header edits perfectly (and you won't, I promise),
|
|
|
|
wikiheaders will send your change to the wiki, and then to make things match,
|
|
|
|
send it right back to the headers with correct word wrapping. Since this
|
|
|
|
happens right after you push your changes, you might as well just write
|
|
|
|
however you like and assume the system will clean it up for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Things that start with `SDL_` will automatically become wiki links.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wikiheaders knows to turn these into links to other pages, so if you reference
|
|
|
|
an SDL symbol in the header documentation, you don't need to link to it.
|
|
|
|
You can optionally wrap the symbol in backticks, and wikiheaders will know to
|
|
|
|
link the backticked thing. It will not generate links in three-backtick
|
|
|
|
code/preformatted blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## URLs will automatically become links.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use Markdown's `[link markup format](https://example.com/)`, but
|
|
|
|
sometimes it's clearer to list bare URLs; the URL will be visible on the
|
2024-06-19 17:14:58 +03:00
|
|
|
wiki page, but also clickable to follow the link. This is up to your judgment
|
2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
on a case-by-case basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Hide stuff from wikiheaders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all else fails, you can block off pieces of the header with this
|
|
|
|
magic line (whitespace is ignored):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
#ifndef SDL_WIKI_DOCUMENTATION_SECTION
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everything between this line and the next `#endif` will just be skipped by
|
|
|
|
wikiheaders. Note that wikiheaders is not a C preprocessor! Don't try to
|
|
|
|
nest conditionals or use `!defined`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just block off sections if you need to. And: you almost never need to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Hide stuff from the compiler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to put something that's only of interest to wikiheaders, the
|
|
|
|
convention is to put it in a block like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
#ifdef SDL_WIKI_DOCUMENTATION_SECTION
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally this is used when there's a collection of preprocessor conditionals
|
|
|
|
to define the same symbol differently in different circumstances. You put
|
|
|
|
that symbol in this block with some reasonable generic version _and the
|
|
|
|
Doxygen-style comment_. Because wikiheaders doesn't care about this
|
|
|
|
preprocessor magic, and the C compiler can be as fancy as it wants, this is
|
|
|
|
strictly a useful convention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Struct/union/enum typedefs must have the name on the first line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is because wikiheaders is not a full C parser. Don't write this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
typedef struct
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int a;
|
|
|
|
int b;
|
|
|
|
} SDL_MyStruct;
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...make sure the name is at the start, too:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
typedef struct SDL_MyStruct
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int a;
|
|
|
|
int b;
|
|
|
|
} SDL_MyStruct;
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wikiheaders will complain loudly if you don't do this, and exit with an
|
|
|
|
error message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Code examples go in the wiki.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We don't want the headers cluttered up with code examples. These live on the
|
|
|
|
wiki pages, and wikiheaders knows to not bridge them back to the headers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put them in a `## Code Examples` section, and make sure to wrap them in a
|
|
|
|
three-backtick-c section for formatting purposes. Only write code in C,
|
|
|
|
please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Do you _need_ a code example?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most code examples aren't actually useful. If your code example is just
|
|
|
|
`SDL_CreateWindow("Hello SDL", 640, 480, 0);` then just delete it; if all
|
|
|
|
you're showing is how to call a function in C, it's not a useful code example.
|
|
|
|
Not all functions need an example. One with complex setup or usage details
|
|
|
|
might, though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Code examples are compiled by GitHub Actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On each change to the wiki, there is a script that pulls out all the code
|
|
|
|
examples into discrete C files and attempts to compile them, and complains
|
|
|
|
if they don't work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-15 21:21:53 +03:00
|
|
|
## Unrecognized sections are left alone in the wiki.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A wiki section that starts with `## Section Name` (or `== Section Name ==` in
|
|
|
|
MediaWiki format) that isn't one of the recognized names will be left alone
|
|
|
|
by wikiheaders. Recognized sections might get overwritten with new content
|
|
|
|
from the headers, but the wiki file will not have other sections cleaned out
|
|
|
|
(this is how Code Examples remain wiki only, for example). You can use this
|
|
|
|
to add Wiki-specific text, or stuff that doesn't make sense in a header, or
|
|
|
|
would merely clutter it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A possibly-incomplete list of sections that will be overwritten by changes
|
|
|
|
to the headers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The page title line, and the "brief" one-sentence description section.
|
|
|
|
- "Deprecated"
|
|
|
|
- "Header File"
|
|
|
|
- "Syntax"
|
|
|
|
- "Function Parameters"
|
|
|
|
- "Macro Parameters"
|
|
|
|
- "Fields"
|
|
|
|
- "Values"
|
|
|
|
- "Return Value"
|
|
|
|
- "Remarks"
|
|
|
|
- "Thread Safety"
|
|
|
|
- "Version"
|
|
|
|
- "See Also"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
## It's okay to repeat yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each individual piece of documentation becomes a separate page on the wiki, so
|
|
|
|
small repeated details can just exist in different pieces of documentation. If
|
|
|
|
it's complicated, it's not unreasonable to say "Please refer to
|
|
|
|
SDL_SomeOtherFunction for more details" ... wiki users can click right
|
|
|
|
through, header users can search for the function name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## The docs directory is bridged to the wiki, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You might be reading this document on the wiki! Any `README-*.md` files in
|
|
|
|
the docs directory are bridged to the wiki, so `docs/README-linux.md` lands
|
|
|
|
at https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/README/linux ...these are just copied directly
|
|
|
|
without any further processing by wikiheaders, and changes go in both
|
|
|
|
directions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-22 02:59:08 +03:00
|
|
|
## The wiki can have its own pages, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a page name isn't a symbol that wikiheaders sees in the headers, or a
|
|
|
|
README in the source's `docs` directory, or a few other exceptions, it'll
|
|
|
|
assume it's an unrelated wiki page and leave it alone. So feel free to
|
|
|
|
write any wiki-only pages that make sense and not worry about it junking
|
|
|
|
up the headers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-15 19:33:16 +03:00
|
|
|
## Wiki categories are (mostly) managed automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The wiki will see this pattern as the last thing on a page and treat it as a
|
|
|
|
list of categories that page belongs to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
[CategoryStuff](CategoryStuff), [CategoryWhatever](CategoryWhatever)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use this to simply tag a page as part of a category, and the user can
|
|
|
|
click directly to see other pages in that category. The wiki will
|
|
|
|
automatically manage a `Category*` pages that list any tagged pages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You _should not_ add tags to the public headers. They don't mean anything
|
|
|
|
there. wikiheaders will add a few tags that make sense when generating wiki
|
|
|
|
content from the header files, and it will preserve other tags already present
|
|
|
|
on the page, so if you want to add extra categories to something, tag it on
|
|
|
|
the wiki itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The wiki uses some magic HTML comment tags to decide how to list items on
|
|
|
|
Category pages and let other content live on the page as well. You can
|
|
|
|
see an example of this in action at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/libsdl-org/sdlwiki/main/SDL3/CategoryEvents.md
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Categorizing the headers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To put a symbol in a specific category, we use three approaches in SDL:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Things in the `SDL_test*.h` headers aren't categorized at all (and you
|
|
|
|
shouldn't document them!)
|
|
|
|
- Most files are categorized by header name: we strip off the leading `SDL_`
|
|
|
|
and capitalize the first letter of what's left. So everything in SDL_audio.h
|
|
|
|
is in the "Audio" category, everything in SDL_video.h is in the "Video"
|
|
|
|
category, etc.
|
|
|
|
- If wikiheaders sees a comment like this on a line by itself...
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* WIKI CATEGORY: Blah */
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
...then all symbols below that will land in the "Blah" category. We use this
|
|
|
|
at the top of a few headers where the simple
|
|
|
|
chop-off-SDL_-and-captialize-the-first-letter trick doesn't work well, but
|
|
|
|
one could theoretically use this for headers that have some overlap in
|
|
|
|
category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Category documentation lives in headers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To document a category (text that lives before the item lists on a wiki
|
|
|
|
category page), you have to follow a simple rule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The _first_ Doxygen-style comment in a header must start with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* # CategoryABC
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If these conditions aren't met, wikiheaders will assume that documentation
|
|
|
|
belongs to whatever is below it instead of the Category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The text of this comment will be added to the appropriate wiki Category page,
|
|
|
|
at the top, replacing everything in the file until it sees a line that starts
|
|
|
|
with an HTML comment (`<!--`), or a line that starts with `----`. Everything
|
|
|
|
after that in the wiki file will be preserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Likewise, when bridging _back_ to the headers, if wikiheaders sees one of
|
|
|
|
these comments, it'll copy the top section of the Category page back into the
|
|
|
|
comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond stripping the initial ` * ` portion off each line, these comments are
|
|
|
|
treated as pure Markdown. They don't support any Doxygen tags like `\sa` or
|
|
|
|
`\since`.
|
|
|
|
|