GUI

WORK IN PROGRESS: I do not garantee that anything works right now

Features

Immediate mode graphical user interface toolkit
Written in C89 (ANSI C)
Small (~2.5kLOC)
Focus on portability and minimal internal state
Suited for embedding into graphical applications
No global hidden state
No direct dependencies (not even libc!)
Renderer and platform independent
Configurable
UTF-8 supported

Limitation

It does NOT provide platform indepenedent window management
It does NOT provide platform independent input handling
It does NOT provide a renderer backend
it does NOT implement a font library
Summary: It is only responsible for the actual user interface

Layer

The gui toolkit consists of three level of abstraction. First the basic widget layer for a as pure functional as possible set of widgets functions without any kind of internal state, with the tradeoff off of a lot of boilerplate code. Second the panel layer for a static grouping of widgets into a panel with a reduced need for a lot of the boilerplate code but takes away some freedom of widget placing and introduces the state of the pannel. Finally there is the context layer which represent the complete window and enables moveable, scaleable and overlapping panels, but needs complete control over the panel management and therefore needs the most amount of internal state. Each higher level of astraction uses the lower level(s) internally to build on but offers a little bit of a different API.

Configuration

While the widgets layer offers the most configuration and even expects you to configure each and every widget, the upper levels provide you with a basic set of configurable attributes like color, padding and spacing.

FAQ

A number of basic widgets are provided but some of the more complex widgets like comboboxes, tables and tree views are not yet implemented. Maybe if I have more time I will look into adding them, except for comboboxes which are just really hard to implement.

Why did you use ANSI C and not C99 or C++?

Personally I stay out of all "discussions" about C vs C++ since they are totally worthless and never brought anything good with it. The simple answer is I personally love C and have nothing against people using C++ exspecially the new iterations with C++11 and C++14. While this hopefully settles my view on C vs C++ there is still ANSI C vs C99. While for personal projects I only use C99 with all its niceties, libraries are a a little bit different. Libraries are designed to reach the highest number of users possible which brings me to ANSI C which is probably the most portable programming language out there. In addition not all C compiler like the MSVC compiler fully support C99, which finalized my decision to use ANSI C.

Why do you typedef our own types instead of using the standard types

Because this project is in ANSI C which does not have the header file <stdint.h> and therefore does not provide me the with fixed sized types that I need. Therefore I defined my own types which need to be set to the correct size for each plaform. But if your development environment provides the header file you can define GUI_USE_FIXED_SIZE_TYPES to directly use the correct types.

References

License

(The MIT License)

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History

GUI