__CONCAT("foo","bar");
actually works to concantate strings, it's because the preprocessor expands
it into "foo""bar" as separate strings, and then ANSI string concatenation
is performed on that. It's more straightforward to just use ANSI string
concatenation directly, and newer GCCs complain (rightly) about misuse
of token pasting.
__CONCAT("foo","bar");
actually works to concantate strings, it's because the preprocessor expands
it into "foo""bar" as separate strings, and then ANSI string concatenation
is performed on that. It's more straightforward to just use ANSI string
concatenation directly, and newer GCCs complain (rightly) about misuse
of token pasting.
__CONCAT("foo","bar");
actually works to concantate strings, it's because the preprocessor expands
it into "foo""bar" as separate strings, and then ANSI string concatenation
is performed on that. It's more straightforward to just use ANSI string
concatenation directly, and newer GCCs complain (rightly) about misuse
of token pasting.
__CONCAT("foo","bar");
actually works to concantate strings, it's because the preprocessor expands
it into "foo""bar" as separate strings, and then ANSI string concatenation
is performed on that. It's more straightforward to just use ANSI string
concatenation directly, and newer GCCs complain (rightly) about misuse
of token pasting.
__CONCAT("PATH=",_PATH_STDPATH);
actually works to concantate strings, it's because the preprocessor expands
it into "PATH=""whatever _PATH_STDPATH is" as separate strings, and then
ANSI string concatenation is performed on that. It's more straightforward
to just use ANSI string concatenation directly, and newer GCCs complain
(rightly) about mis-use of token pasting.
__CONCAT("PATH=",_PATH_STDPATH);
actually works to concantate strings, it's because the preprocessor expands
it into "PATH=""whatever _PATH_STDPATH is" as separate strings, and then
ANSI string concatenation is performed on that. It's more straightforward
to just use ANSI string concatenation directly, and newer GCCs complain
(rightly) about mis-use of token pasting.
Also, when failing, don't try to use the non-initialized context value
to determine the error text.
This avoids dumping core in the following programs when /etc/krb5.conf is
missing or broken: klist, kdestroy, kpasswd, kadmin, kadmind, ktutil, kdc.
XXX Better error reporting in this failure case would be nice.
augustss