some chinese chars may get converted into JIS0208/0213 on
"iconv -f utf-8 -t iso-2022-jp-2". but anyway, it's iso-2022-*jp*-2 so
japanese chars should take precedence.
XXX what should we do about X11 ctext?
i really hate unicode han unification.
do we really need to support language tags?
Rework a bunch of make .for loops into sh for loops.
(XXX: This stuff could be implemented in a more efficient manner that
does a lot less of SOMEMAKEVAR!=some shell command , etc etc)
${_MKMSG} " ... {$.TARGET}" and use appropriately.
Provide _MKMSGLINK.m to provide "link" message by itself (without ${.TARGET})
Replace _MKSHCMD with _MKSHECHO
Supported values:
0 Minimal output ("quiet")
1 Describe what is occurring
2 Describe what is occurring and echo the actual command ("verbose")
This is the default, and is equivalent to the previous behaviour.
removing the advertising clause. Diffs provided in PR 22410 by Joel
Baker, confirmed to the board by Jason Downs.
With additional thanks to Jason Thorpe.
<sys/bootblock.h>:
* Added definitions for the Master Boot Record (MBR) used by
a variety of systems (primarily i386), including the format
of the BIOS Parameter Block (BPB).
This information was cribbed from a variety of sources
including <sys/disklabel_mbr.h> which this is a superset of.
As part of this, some data structure elements and #defines
were renamed to be more "namespace friendly" and consistent
with other bootblocks and MBR documentation.
Update all uses of the old names to the new names.
<sys/disklabel_mbr.h>:
* Deprecated in favor of <sys/bootblock.h> (the latter is more
"host tool" friendly).
amd64 & i386:
* Renamed /usr/mdec/bootxx_dosfs to /usr/mdec/bootxx_msdos, to
be consistent with the naming convention of the msdosfs tools.
* Removed /usr/mdec/bootxx_ufs, as it's equivalent to bootxx_ffsv1
and it's confusing to have two functionally equivalent bootblocks,
especially given that "ufs" has multiple meanings (it could be
a synonym for "ffs", or the group of ffs/lfs/ext2fs file systems).
* Rework pbr.S (the first sector of bootxx_*):
+ Ensure that BPB (bytes 11..89) and the partition table
(bytes 446..509) do not contain code.
+ Add support for booting from FAT partitions if BOOT_FROM_FAT
is defined. (Only set for bootxx_msdos).
+ Remove "dummy" partition 3; if people want to installboot(8)
these to the start of the disk they can use fdisk(8) to
create a real MBR partition table...
+ Compile with TERSE_ERROR so it fits because of the above.
Whilst this is less user friendly, I feel it's important
to have a valid partition table and BPB in the MBR/PBR.
* Renamed /usr/mdec/biosboot to /usr/mdec/boot, to be consistent
with other platforms.
* Enable SUPPORT_DOSFS in /usr/mdec/boot (stage2), so that
we can boot off FAT partitions.
* Crank version of /usr/mdec/boot to 3.1, and fix some of the other
entries in the version file.
installboot(8) (i386):
* Read the existing MBR of the filesystem and retain the BIOS
Parameter Block (BPB) in bytes 11..89 and the MBR partition
table in bytes 446..509. (Previously installboot(8) would
trash those two sections of the MBR.)
mbrlabel(8):
* Use sys/lib/libkern/xlat_mbr_fstype.c instead of homegrown code
to map the MBR partition type to the NetBSD disklabel type.
Test built "make release" for i386, and new bootblocks verified to work
(even off FAT!).
on the setting of ${SHLIBDIR} and ${SHLIBINSTALLDIR} (_not_ ${_LIBSODIR}).
Fixes cruel and unusual ^W^W^W obscure native-build and not-so-obscure
cross-builds problems I was having with shared libraries with a
non-base LIBDIR (e.g, /usr/X11R6/lib) that use LDADD to pull in other
libraries from /usr/lib (such as libm) which are really in /lib and the
symlink from ${DESTDIR}/usr/lib/libm.so to /lib/libm.so.N.M was confusing
the linker. Stuffing -rpath-link ${DESTDIR}/lib in solves the problem.
This should mean that shared libraries that depend upon other shared
libraries in other directories should DTRT in a DESTDIR (cross-)build...
Inspired by _PROGLDOPTS in <bsd.prog.mk>
mbw