Use uintN_t in code example instead of u_intN_t. Agrees with current

standards (and more importantly Klaus too :-).
This commit is contained in:
simonb 2003-09-27 21:17:31 +00:00
parent 772b1d9073
commit 47d4b67a20
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* $NetBSD: style,v 1.26 2003/08/05 13:26:13 jmmv Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: style,v 1.27 2003/09/27 21:17:31 simonb Exp $ */
/*
* The revision control tag appears first, with a blank line after it.
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
__COPYRIGHT("@(#) Copyright (c) 2000\n\
The NetBSD Foundation, inc. All rights reserved.\n");
__RCSID("$NetBSD: style,v 1.26 2003/08/05 13:26:13 jmmv Exp $");
__RCSID("$NetBSD: style,v 1.27 2003/09/27 21:17:31 simonb Exp $");
/*
* VERY important single-line comments look like this.
@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ struct foo {
unsigned int baz:1, /* Bitfield; line up entries if desired */
fuz:5,
zap:2;
u_int8_t flag;
uint8_t flag;
};
struct foo *foohead; /* Head of global foo list */