x86: Omit needless store in membar_producer/exit.
On x86, every store is a store-release, so there is no need for any barrier. But this wasn't a barrier anyway; it was just a store, which was redundant with the store of the return address to the stack implied by CALL even if issuing a store made a difference.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e0c914a79b
commit
3066bbbbf8
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
/* $NetBSD: atomic.S,v 1.31 2022/04/09 12:07:00 riastradh Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: atomic.S,v 1.32 2022/04/09 12:07:17 riastradh Exp $ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*-
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 2007 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
||||
|
@ -188,8 +188,11 @@ ENTRY(_membar_consumer)
|
|||
END(_membar_consumer)
|
||||
|
||||
ENTRY(_membar_producer)
|
||||
/* A store is enough */
|
||||
movl $0, -4(%esp)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Every store to normal memory is a store-release on x86, so
|
||||
* there is never any need for explicit barriers to order
|
||||
* anything-before-store.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret
|
||||
END(_membar_producer)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
/* $NetBSD: atomic.S,v 1.24 2022/04/09 12:07:00 riastradh Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: atomic.S,v 1.25 2022/04/09 12:07:17 riastradh Exp $ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*-
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 2007 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
||||
|
@ -263,8 +263,11 @@ ENTRY(_membar_consumer)
|
|||
END(_membar_consumer)
|
||||
|
||||
ENTRY(_membar_producer)
|
||||
/* A store is enough */
|
||||
movq $0, -8(%rsp)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Every store to normal memory is a store-release on x86, so
|
||||
* there is never any need for explicit barriers to order
|
||||
* anything-before-store.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret
|
||||
END(_membar_producer)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue