Add module test for scancode index conversions

This commit is contained in:
matt335672 2024-06-19 17:04:12 +01:00
parent c91ef80ca9
commit 43d6db45ed
1 changed files with 49 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -7,6 +7,40 @@
#include "test_common.h"
// Max supported scancode value
#define MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE 0x1ff
// Checks conversions to-and-from scancode indexes
START_TEST(test_scancode__scancode_to_index)
{
int i;
// In the range 0x00 - 0x7f, scancodes are the same as indexes
for (i = 0x0; i <= 0x7f; ++i)
{
ck_assert_int_eq(scancode_to_index(i), i);
ck_assert_int_eq(scancode_from_index(i), i);
}
// Scancodes from 0x80 - 0xff are not supported
for (i = 0x80; i <= 0xff; ++i)
{
ck_assert_int_eq(scancode_to_index(i), -1);
}
// 0x100 - 0x17f map to 0x80 - 0xff
for (i = 0x100; i <= 0x17f; ++i)
{
ck_assert_int_eq(scancode_to_index(i), i - 0x80);
ck_assert_int_eq(scancode_from_index(i - 0x80), i);
}
// Scancodes from 0x180 - MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE are not supported
for (i = 0x180; i <= MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE; ++i)
{
ck_assert_int_eq(scancode_to_index(i), -1);
}
}
// Checks all returned evdev scancodes are mapped to a keycode
START_TEST(test_scancode__keycode_sets)
{
@ -31,6 +65,8 @@ START_TEST(test_scancode__evdev_all_values_returned)
iter = 0;
while ((scancode = scancode_get_next(&iter)) != 0)
{
ck_assert_int_ge(scancode, 0);
ck_assert_int_le(scancode, MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE);
unsigned short keycode = scancode_to_x11_keycode(scancode);
ck_assert_int_ne(keycode, 0);
}
@ -40,8 +76,8 @@ END_TEST
// Checks all invalid evdev scancodes return 0
START_TEST(test_scancode__evdev_bad_values_mapped_to_0)
{
// Store valid scancodes which are between 0 and 0x1ff
int valid[512] = {0};
// Store valid scancodes which are between 0 and MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE
char valid[MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE + 1] = {0};
unsigned int iter;
unsigned int scancode;
@ -50,10 +86,12 @@ START_TEST(test_scancode__evdev_bad_values_mapped_to_0)
iter = 0;
while ((scancode = scancode_get_next(&iter)) != 0)
{
ck_assert_int_ge(scancode, 0);
ck_assert_int_le(scancode, MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE);
valid[scancode] = 1;
}
for (scancode = 0 ; scancode < 512; ++scancode)
for (scancode = 0 ; scancode <= MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE; ++scancode)
{
if (!valid[scancode])
{
@ -74,6 +112,8 @@ START_TEST(test_scancode__base_all_values_returned)
iter = 0;
while ((scancode = scancode_get_next(&iter)) != 0)
{
ck_assert_int_ge(scancode, 0);
ck_assert_int_le(scancode, MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE);
unsigned short keycode = scancode_to_x11_keycode(scancode);
ck_assert_int_ne(keycode, 0);
}
@ -83,8 +123,8 @@ END_TEST
// Checks all invalid base scancodes return 0
START_TEST(test_scancode__base_bad_values_mapped_to_0)
{
// Store valid scancodes which are between 0 and 0x1ff
int valid[512] = {0};
// Store valid scancodes which are between 0 and MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE
char valid[MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE + 1] = {0};
unsigned int iter;
unsigned int scancode;
@ -93,10 +133,12 @@ START_TEST(test_scancode__base_bad_values_mapped_to_0)
iter = 0;
while ((scancode = scancode_get_next(&iter)) != 0)
{
ck_assert_int_ge(scancode, 0);
ck_assert_int_le(scancode, MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE);
valid[scancode] = 1;
}
for (scancode = 0 ; scancode < 512; ++scancode)
for (scancode = 0 ; scancode <= MAX_SUPPORTED_SCANCODE; ++scancode)
{
if (!valid[scancode])
{
@ -118,6 +160,7 @@ make_suite_test_scancode(void)
tc = tcase_create("scancode");
suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
tcase_add_test(tc, test_scancode__scancode_to_index);
tcase_add_test(tc, test_scancode__keycode_sets);
tcase_add_test(tc, test_scancode__evdev_all_values_returned);
tcase_add_test(tc, test_scancode__evdev_bad_values_mapped_to_0);