David Garske d2a6c6838e Fix for ECC with !WC_NO_CACHE_RESISTANT and ALT_ECC_SIZE causing invalid mp_int*. An ecc_point with ALT_ECC_SIZE is "mp_int* x" vs. "mp_int x[1]". The resulting pointer for &M[0]->x is not valid in the ALT_ECC_SIZE case. This was found while testing ECC on a Cortex M4 (32-bit) and caused a hard fault.

2016-10-14 16:44:57 -07:00

..

benchmark

…

src

Fix for ECC with !WC_NO_CACHE_RESISTANT and ALT_ECC_SIZE causing invalid mp_int*. An ecc_point with ALT_ECC_SIZE is "mp_int* x" vs. "mp_int x[1]". The resulting pointer for &M[0]->x is not valid in the ALT_ECC_SIZE case. This was found while testing ECC on a Cortex M4 (32-bit) and caused a hard fault.

2016-10-14 16:44:57 -07:00

test

…

user-crypto

…