DPMS kicks in only when wscreensaver is launched, in the moment that shell
call lock() for the second time. Backlight control internals are managed by
libbacklight:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vignatti/libbacklight/
Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@intel.com>
This allows each output back end to optimize drawing using overlay planes
and cursors (yet to be integrated). If a surface is assigned to a
plane, the back end should clear its damage field so that the later
repaint code won't look at it.
weston_surface::transform.boundingbox depends on width and height, and
therefore geometry.dirty flag, so move width and height into geometry.
Fix all users and check that the dirty flag is set.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
Not sure this check belongs here, but as the position checks are here
too, I added this. Just so we don't forget.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
weston_surface::transform.position depends on x,y, and therefore the
dirty flag, so move x and y into geometry.
Also add the missing dirty flags.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
We've trimmed down the actual repaint loop to just iterating through the
surface list and calling weston_surface_draw(), so we push that to the
backend without too much code duplication.
gbm_bo_create_from_egl_image() should catch this based on the
GBM_BO_USE_CURSOR_64X64 flag. It currently doesn't so we end up with
a cursor buffer with invalid stride.
If we don't cancel the repaint, we end up pointlessly redrawing the output.
What's worse is that pageflipping to the new buffer eventually fails and
we miss the finish_frame callback, leaving the compositor stuck when we
re-enter the vt.
Normally the repaint will trigger a pageflip, which flips back to our
fb, but that doesn't work if the kms output has been turned off or
set to a different mode.
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
