Add a crazy rambling style TODO file.
This commit is contained in:
parent
43c28eee32
commit
f75f0e80b7
|
@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
|
|||
*.o
|
||||
*.so
|
||||
*.pc
|
||||
glx-compositor
|
||||
egl-compositor
|
||||
wayland-system-compositor
|
||||
gears
|
||||
terminal
|
||||
flower
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
|
|||
- sync-to-vblank
|
||||
|
||||
- switch scanout when top surface is full screen
|
||||
|
||||
- what about cursors then? maybe use hw cursors if the cursor
|
||||
satisfies hw limitations (64x64, only one cursor), switch to
|
||||
composited cursors if not.
|
||||
|
||||
- multihead, screen geometry and crtc layout protocol, hotplug
|
||||
|
||||
- input device discovery, hotplug
|
||||
|
||||
- Advertise axes as part of the discovery, use something like
|
||||
"org.wayland.input.x" to identify the axes.
|
||||
|
||||
- wayland-system-compositor
|
||||
|
||||
- device kit/libudev/console kit integration to discover seats,
|
||||
that is, groups of input devices and outputs that provide a
|
||||
means for one user to interact with the system. That is,
|
||||
typically a mouse, keyboard and a screen. The input devices
|
||||
will just be evdev devices, the outputs will be a drm device
|
||||
filename and the specific outputs accessible throught that drm
|
||||
device.
|
||||
|
||||
- send drm device in connection info, probably just udev path.
|
||||
|
||||
- cairo-drm; wayland needs cairo-drm one way or another:
|
||||
|
||||
- chris wilson (ickle) is doing cairo-drm for i915 now, basically
|
||||
the pixman-drm idean, but inside cairo instead.
|
||||
|
||||
- pixman-drm; move the ddx driver batchbuffer logic into libdrm
|
||||
and write native, direct rendering acceleration code in
|
||||
pixman-drm. is a clean approach in that we avoid the mess of
|
||||
the global GL context leaking through to applications, and we
|
||||
can bootstrap this project by pulling in the EXA hooks from the
|
||||
DDX drivers.
|
||||
|
||||
- use open gl behind the scenes a la glitz.
|
||||
|
||||
- should be possible to provide a realistic api and then stub out
|
||||
the implementation with pwrite and pread so gtk+ port can proceed.
|
||||
|
||||
- XKB like client side library for translating keyboard events to
|
||||
more useful keycodes and modifiers etc. Will probably be shared
|
||||
between toolkits as a low-level library.
|
||||
|
||||
- port gtk+
|
||||
|
||||
- eek, so much X legacy stuff there...
|
||||
|
||||
- draw window decorations in gtkwindow.c
|
||||
|
||||
- start from alexl's client-side-windows branch
|
||||
|
||||
- Details about pointer grabs. wayland doesn't have active grabs,
|
||||
menus will behave subtly different. Under X, clicking a menu
|
||||
open grabs the pointer and clicking outside the window pops down
|
||||
the menu and swallows the click. without active grabs we can't
|
||||
swallow the click. I'm sure there much more...
|
||||
|
||||
- Port Qt? There's already talk about this on the list.
|
||||
|
||||
- X on Wayland
|
||||
|
||||
- move most of the code from xf86-video-intel into a Xorg wayland
|
||||
module.
|
||||
|
||||
- don't ask KMS for available output and modes, use the info from
|
||||
the wayland server. then stop mooching off of drmmode.c.
|
||||
|
||||
- map multiple wayland input devices to MPX in Xorg.
|
||||
|
||||
- rootless; avoid allocating and setting the front buffer, draw
|
||||
window decorations in the X server (!), how to map input?
|
||||
|
||||
- gnome-shell as a wayland session compositor
|
||||
|
||||
- runs as a client of the wayland session compositor, uses
|
||||
clutter+egl on wayland
|
||||
|
||||
- talks to an Xorg server as the compositing and window manager
|
||||
for that server and renders the output to a wayland surface.
|
||||
the Xorg server should be modified to take input from the system
|
||||
compositor through gnome-shell, but not allocate a front buffer.
|
||||
|
||||
- make gnome-shell itself a nested wayland server and allow native
|
||||
wayland clients to connect and can native wayland windows with
|
||||
the windows from the X server.
|
||||
|
||||
- qemu as a wayland client; session surface as X case
|
||||
|
||||
- qemu has too simple acceleration, so a Wayland backend like the
|
||||
SDL/VNC ones it has now is trivial.
|
||||
|
||||
- paravirt: forward wayland screen info as mmio, expose gem ioctls as mmio
|
||||
|
||||
- mapping vmem is tricky, should try to only use ioctl (pwrite+pread)
|
||||
|
||||
- not useful for Windows without a windows paravirt driver.
|
||||
|
||||
- two approaches: 1) do a toplevel qemu window, or 2) expose a
|
||||
wayland server in the guest that forwards to the host wayland
|
||||
server, ie a "remote" compositor, but with the gem buffers
|
||||
shared. could do a wl_connection directly on mmio memory, with
|
||||
head and tail pointers. use an alloc_head register to indicate
|
||||
desired data to write, if it overwrites tail, block guest. just
|
||||
a socket would be easier.
|
||||
|
||||
- make libwayland-client less ghetto
|
||||
|
||||
- sparse based idl compiler
|
||||
|
||||
- actually make batch/commit batch up commands
|
||||
|
||||
- protocol for setting the cursor image
|
||||
|
||||
- should we have a mechanism to attach surface to cursor for
|
||||
guaranteed non-laggy drag?
|
||||
|
||||
- auth; We need to generate a random socket name and advertise that
|
||||
on dbus along with a connection cookie. Something like a method
|
||||
that returns the socket name and a connection cookie. The
|
||||
connection cookie is just another random string that the client
|
||||
must pass to the wayland server to become authenticated. The
|
||||
Wayland server generates the cookie on demand when the dbus method
|
||||
is called and expires it after 5s or so.
|
||||
|
||||
- enter/leave events from the input devices
|
||||
|
||||
- gain, lose keyboard focus events; this event carries information
|
||||
about which keys are currently held down as a surface gains focus
|
||||
so the client can deduce modifier state.
|
||||
|
||||
- Range protocol may not be sufficient... if a server cycles through
|
||||
2^32 object IDs we don't have a way to handle wrapping. And since
|
||||
we hand out a range of 256 IDs to each new clients, we're just
|
||||
talking about 2^24 clients. That's 31 years with a new client
|
||||
every minute... Maybe just use bigger ranges, then it's feasible
|
||||
to track and garbage collect them when a client dies.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue