mirror of
https://github.com/frida/tinycc
synced 2025-01-03 18:44:46 +03:00
d79caa9ff6
linkers don't treat relocations using symindex 0 (undefined) very well, it can't be misused as indicator for an absolute number. Just don't bother with special casing this, rather emit an indirect call/jump right away. ARM64 needs the same (and didn't handle calls via constant absolute func pointers before). The testcase as is doesn't fail without the patch, it actually needs separate compilation (to -fPIC .o file, then to shared lib) to fail.
36 lines
360 B
C
36 lines
360 B
C
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
|
|
int myfunc(int x)
|
|
{
|
|
return x * x;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void vfunc(int a)
|
|
{
|
|
printf("a=%d\n", a);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void qfunc()
|
|
{
|
|
printf("qfunc()\n");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void zfunc()
|
|
{
|
|
((void (*)(void))0) ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main()
|
|
{
|
|
printf("%d\n", myfunc(3));
|
|
printf("%d\n", myfunc(4));
|
|
|
|
vfunc(1234);
|
|
|
|
qfunc();
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// vim: set expandtab ts=4 sw=3 sts=3 tw=80 :
|