mirror of
https://github.com/frida/tinycc
synced 2024-12-25 22:46:49 +03:00
d79e1dee8c
- tests2/113_btdll.c: test handling multiple stabs infos
Also:
- libtcc.c: remove _ISOC99_SOURCE pre-defines. It is causing
strange warnings such as 'strdup not declared'
- i386/x86_64-gen.c cleanup bounds_pro/epilog. This discards
the extra code for main's argv. If needed, __argv might be
processed instead.
- tccgen.c:block(): reduce stackspace usage. For example with
code like "if (..) ... else if (..) ... else if (..)... "
considerable numbers of nested block() calls may occur.
Before that most stack space used when compiling itself was
for libtcc.c:tcc_set_linker().
Now it's rather this construct at tccpp.c:2765: in next_nomacro1():
if (!((isidnum_table[c - CH_EOF] & (IS_ID|IS_NUM))
|| c == '.'
|| ((c == '+' || c == '-')
...
143 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
143 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
[test_backtrace_1]
|
|
* main
|
|
* f1()
|
|
* f2()
|
|
* f3()
|
|
112_backtrace.c:9: at f3: RUNTIME ERROR: invalid memory access
|
|
112_backtrace.c:14: by f2
|
|
112_backtrace.c:19: by f1
|
|
112_backtrace.c:24: by main
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_1]
|
|
* main
|
|
* f1()
|
|
112_backtrace.c:38: at f1: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in memmove dest
|
|
112_backtrace.c:43: by main
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_tcc_backtrace_2]
|
|
* main
|
|
* f1()
|
|
112_backtrace.c:64: at f1: Hello from f1!
|
|
112_backtrace.c:70: by main
|
|
* f2()
|
|
* exit f2
|
|
[returns 34]
|
|
|
|
[test_tcc_backtrace_3]
|
|
* main
|
|
[returns 1]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_100]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:107: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in memcpy dest
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_101]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:109: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in memcpy src
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_102]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:111: at main: BCHECK: overlapping regions ........(0x?), ........(0x?) in memcpy
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_103]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:113: at main: BCHECK: overlapping regions ........(0x?), ........(0x?) in memcpy
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_104]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:115: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in memcmp s1
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_105]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:117: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in memcmp s2
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_106]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:119: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in memmove dest
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_107]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:121: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in memmove src
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_108]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:123: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in memset
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_109]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:125: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strlen
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_110]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:127: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strcpy dest
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_111]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:129: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strcpy src
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_112]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:131: at main: BCHECK: overlapping regions ........(0x?), ........(0x?) in strcpy
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_113]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:133: at main: BCHECK: overlapping regions ........(0x?), ........(0x?) in strcpy
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_114]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:135: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strncpy dest
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_115]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:137: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strncpy src
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_116]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:139: at main: BCHECK: overlapping regions ........(0x?), ........(0x?) in strncpy
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_117]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:141: at main: BCHECK: overlapping regions ........(0x?), ........(0x?) in strncpy
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_118]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:143: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strcmp s1
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_119]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:145: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strcmp s2
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_120]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:147: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strncmp s1
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_121]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:149: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strncmp s2
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_122]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:151: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strcat dest
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_123]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:153: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strcat dest
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_124]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:155: at main: BCHECK: overlapping regions ........(0x?), ........(0x?) in strcat
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_125]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:157: at main: BCHECK: overlapping regions ........(0x?), ........(0x?) in strcat
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_126]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:159: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strchr
|
|
[returns 255]
|
|
|
|
[test_bcheck_127]
|
|
112_backtrace.c:161: at main: BCHECK: invalid pointer ........, size 0x? in strdup
|
|
[returns 255]
|