int i = i++ causes a segfault because of missing guard. Looking
recursively at all backend functions called from middle end several more
guard appeared to be missing.
From: Matteo Cypriani <mcy@lm7.fr>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:22:56 -0400
Subject: Disable floating-point test for ARM soft-float
tcc is not yet capable of doing softfloat floating-point operations on
ARM, therefore we disable this test for these platforms. Note that tcc
displays a warning to warn ARM users about this limitation
(debian)
From: Matteo Cypriani <mcy@lm7.fr>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:22:56 -0400
Subject: Disable floating-point test for ARM soft-float
tcc is not yet capable of doing softfloat floating-point operations on
ARM, therefore we disable this test for these platforms. Note that tcc
displays a warning to warn ARM users about this limitation
(debian)
A non declared function leads to a seriuos problems. And while
gcc don't turn this warning on lets tcc do it. This warning
can be turned off by -Wno-implicit-function-declaration option.
And autor must explicitly do this if program must be compiled
with this warning off.
* tccpp.c (parse_number): `shift' should be 1 while parsing binary
floating point number.
* tests/tests2/70_floating_point_literals.c: New test cases for
floating point number parsing.
Clear CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to build the tests, in case the main Makefile
passes some flags that aren't handled by tcc (we are not compiling tcc
here, we are using tcc to compile the tests).
- remove -norunsrc switch
Meaning and usage (-run -norun...???) look sort of screwed. Also
general usefulness is unclear, so it was actually to support exactly
one (not even very interesting) test
This partially reverts e31579b076
This provides a simple implementation of alloca for ARM (and enables
the associated testcase). As tcc for ARM doesn't contain an assembler,
we'll have to resort using gcc for compiling it.
Result of float to unsigned integer conversion is undefined if float is
negative. This commit take the absolute value of the float before doing
the conversion to unsigned integer and add more float to integer
conversion test.
- Thanks to Kirill "tcc -b itself" should work now
(was removed in d5f4df09ff)
Also:
- tests/Makefile:
- fix spurious --I from 767410b875
- lookup boundtest.c via VPATH (for out-of-tree build)
- test[123]b?: fail on diff error
- Windows: test3 now works (from e31579b076)
- abitest: a libtcc.a made by gcc is not usable for tcc
on WIndows - using source instead (libtcc.c)
- tccpe:
- avoid gcc warning (x86_64)
negate(x) is subtract(-0,x), not subtract(+0,x), which makes
a difference with signed zeros. Also +x was expressed as x+0,
in order for the integer promotions to happen, but also mangles signed
zeros, so just don't do that with floating types.
- Build libtcc1 for cross-compiler on arm (arm to X cross compilers)
- Install libtcc1 and includes for arm to i386 cross compiler
- Add basic check of cross-compilers (compile ex1.c)
- tccgen: error out for cast to void, as in
void foo(void) { return 1; }
This avoids an assertion failure in x86_64-gen.c, also.
also fix tests2/03_struct.c accordingly
- Error: "memory full" - be more specific
- Makefiles: remove circular dependencies, lookup tcctest.c from VPATH
- tcc.h: cleanup lib, include, crt and libgcc search paths"
avoid duplication or trailing slashes with no CONFIG_MULTIARCHDIR
(as from 9382d6f1a0)
- tcc.h: remove ";{B}" from PE search path
in ce5e12c2f9 James Lyon wrote:
"... I'm not sure this is the right way to fix this problem."
And the answer is: No, please. (copying libtcc1.a for tests instead)
- win32/build_tcc.bat: do not move away a versioned file
stdarg_test in abitest.c relies on a sum of some parameters made by both
the caller and the callee to reach the same result. However, the
variables used to store the temporary result of the additions are not
initialized to 0, leading to uncertainty as to the results. This commit
add this needed initialization.
VLA storage is now freed when it goes out of scope. This makes it
possible to use a VLA inside a loop without consuming an unlimited
amount of memory.
Combining VLAs with alloca() should work as in GCC - when a VLA is
freed, memory allocated by alloca() after the VLA was created is also
freed. There are some exceptions to this rule when using goto: if a VLA
is in scope at the goto, jumping to a label will reset the stack pointer
to where it was immediately after the last VLA was created prior to the
label, or to what it was before the first VLA was created if the label
is outside the scope of any VLA. This means that in some cases combining
alloca() and VLAs will free alloca() memory where GCC would not.
long double arguments require 16-byte alignment on the stack, which
requires adjustment when the the stack offset is not an evven number of
8-byte words.
