Commit Graph

103 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
grischka
232650f8b3 tccgen: reset aligned attribute for next type
Basically, with:
    typedef __attribute__((aligned(16))) struct _xyz {
         ...
    } xyz, *pxyz;

we want the struct aligned but not the pointer.

FIXME: This patch is a hack, waiting for someone in the knowledge
of correct __attribute__ semantics.
2011-07-14 19:00:46 +02:00
Joe Soroka
c71798c376 handle arrays with a flexible member but no initializer 2011-07-11 00:18:36 -07:00
Joe Soroka
cd3d1a45f3 better constant handling for expr_cond 2011-07-11 00:00:47 -07:00
Thomas Preud'homme
ee06ef9dd3 Remove unused variables
Remove unused local variables and declare them conditionally when they
are used only on some architectures.
2011-05-16 14:15:32 +02:00
Joe Soroka
2b7a8eb8f5 use of TOK_alloca breaks cross compiler build
VLA inserts a call to alloca via enum TOK_alloca, but TOK_alloca
only exists on I386 and X86_64 targets.  This patch just emits an
error at compile-time if someone tries to compile some VLA code
for a TOK_alloca-less target. The best solution might be to just
push the problem to link-time, since the existence-or-not of a
alloca implementation can only be determined by linking.  It seems
like just declaring TOK_alloca unconditionally would achieve that,
but for now, this at least gets the cross compilers to build.
2011-04-12 00:17:08 -07:00
Joe Soroka
812781cd11 simplify/rollback VLA pointer subtraction
I don't know if it makes a difference to gen_op(TOK_PDIV) or not,
but logically the ptr1_is_vla test in TP's VLA patch seems out of
order, where the patch to fix it would be:
------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1581,15 +1581,15 @@ ST_FUNC void gen_op(int op)
                 u = pointed_size(&vtop[-1].type);
             }
             gen_opic(op);
+            if (ptr1_is_vla)
+                vswap();
             /* set to integer type */
 #ifdef TCC_TARGET_X86_64
             vtop->type.t = VT_LLONG;
 #else
             vtop->type.t = VT_INT;
 #endif
-            if (ptr1_is_vla)
-                vswap();
-            else
+            if (!ptr1_is_vla)
                 vpushi(u);
             gen_op(TOK_PDIV);
         } else {
------------------------------------------------------------------

Instead of that patch, which increases the complexity of the code,
this one fixes the problem by just rolling back and retrying with
a simpler approach.
2011-04-11 23:39:27 -07:00
Joe Soroka
1b8c094f39 remove no-longer-necessary naive fix for vla vstack leak 2011-04-09 23:04:01 -07:00
Joe Soroka
c85f77de70 prevent internal segfault on apparent VLA at file scope 2011-04-09 22:59:35 -07:00
Joe Soroka
1446b543ae VLA fix [3/3]: store VLA sizeofs in anonymous runtime stack vars 2011-04-09 22:52:25 -07:00
Joe Soroka
7c7ca3c6aa VLA fix [2/3]: removed VT_ARRAY from VT_VLA types
A VLA is not really an array, it's a pointer-to-an-array.
Making this explicit allows us to back out a few parts
of the original VLA patch and paves the way for the next
part of the fix, where a VLA will be stored on the runtime
stack as a pointer-to-an-array, rather than on the compile-
time stack as a Sym*.
2011-04-08 01:09:39 -07:00
Joe Soroka
174d61a56e move a comment to its correct location 2011-04-08 00:46:32 -07:00
Joe Soroka
b714af0405 add naive workaround for VLA vstack leak 2011-04-08 00:44:01 -07:00
Joe Soroka
c94f80502e VLA bcheck works via bound alloca; add test, remove warning 2011-04-06 15:27:45 -07:00
Joe Soroka
810aca9e68 clarify post_type() VT_STORAGE handling by moving it out 2011-04-06 12:08:50 -07:00
Joe Soroka
ace0f7f259 re-apply VLA by Thomas Preud'homme 2011-04-06 09:17:03 -07:00
Joe Soroka
17571298f3 handle c99 flexible array members less hackily 2011-03-18 17:50:42 -07:00
Joe Soroka
06a7c415a9 revert complicated & broken flexible array member handling 2011-03-18 17:47:35 -07:00
Joe Soroka
0b8aa909a3 fix c99 for-loop init decl scope (thanks: grischka)
see http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2011-03/msg00005.html
2011-03-08 15:19:54 -08:00
Joe Soroka
9ff91d4c6f clarify support for functions returning an array (try#2)
fixes first attempt:
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git/commitdiff/31fe1cc
2011-03-08 15:12:09 -08:00
Joe Soroka
91163f167e revert last commit. fails "make test"
test target in Makefile does not depend on tcc.
i'm not sure why, but i can think of at least one
good reason.  in my local tree I have it modified
to do so, but somehow inadvertently reverted that
so when i did "make test" before committing, it
didn't actually test my changes.  sorry.
2011-03-08 14:58:02 -08:00
Joe Soroka
31fe1cc62b clarify support for functions returning an array
previously, tcc would accept a prototype of a function returning
an array, but not giving those functions bodies nor calling them.
it seems that gcc has never supported them, so we should probably
just error out... but it's possible that someone already using
tcc includes some header that contains an unused prototype for
one, so let's continue to support that.
2011-03-08 14:13:08 -08:00
Joe Soroka
5eb82755db support c99 for-loop init decls (2nd attempt) 2011-03-08 13:36:04 -08:00
Joe Soroka
7fc2eee55c partially revert e23194a
see http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2011-03/msg00002.html
2011-03-08 13:22:48 -08:00
Joe Soroka
b3a8eed49e revert last 3 commits. will find better way. 2011-03-08 12:56:13 -08:00
Joe Soroka
2d292e69a1 small change to previous whitespace-only commit 2011-03-08 09:26:36 -08:00
Joe Soroka
545a37b306 some indentation made prev patch pretty; removed it 2011-03-08 01:59:50 -08:00
Joe Soroka
89059f94c0 refactor post_type() to be explicit about its recursion 2011-03-08 01:47:31 -08:00
Joe Soroka
772b302187 added a note clarifying post_type() recursion
some ancient pre-K&R C allows a function to return an array
and the array brackets to be put after the arguments, such
that "int c()[]" means the same as "int[] c()"
see:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2399
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/classes.html#38703
2011-03-08 01:33:17 -08:00
Joe Soroka
e23194a1fa support c99 for-loop init decls 2011-03-07 11:28:31 -08:00
Joe Soroka
4fbe3cda33 use new weaken_symbol() to fix another real-world corner case 2011-03-07 01:05:09 -08:00
Joe Soroka
8bcb2ae1b2 factor out symbol weakening into new function 2011-03-07 01:02:23 -08:00
Joe Soroka
0f0c2d9c02 weak redefinition of a symbol should weaken the original 2011-03-07 00:25:27 -08:00
Joe Soroka
38cbb40e90 __typeof(t) should not include storage modifiers of t 2011-03-06 22:32:35 -08:00
Joe Soroka
c93eca4fe4 tccgen: handle __attribute((alias("target"))) 2011-03-03 01:58:45 -08:00
Joe Soroka
ce8c1886a5 collapse branch in decl(), making way for next patch 2011-03-03 01:07:36 -08:00
Joe Soroka
3beb383236 handle post-asm-label attributes on variables 2011-03-03 00:55:02 -08:00
Joe Soroka
823f832630 tcc: fix weak attribute handling 2011-03-02 13:31:09 -08:00
Jaroslav Kysela
ab73c9bc4e fix another static struct init issue (arrays with unknown size at end) 2011-02-22 12:15:45 +01:00
Jaroslav Kysela
dbefae52b0 Fix complex static initializers (handle additional '}' and '{' brackets)
- added an example to test suite
- the "warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type"
  is present but harmless
2011-02-22 12:15:44 +01:00
Thomas Preud'homme
11b2d33523 Add support of asm label for variables.
Add support for asm labels for variables, that is the ability to rename
a variable at assembly level with __asm__ ("newname") appended in
its declaration.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.4/gcc/Asm-Labels.html for more
details.
2011-02-09 00:12:57 +01:00
Thomas Preud'homme
32a682b88f Fix fct asm label: only valid for declaration
- Fix function assembly label mechanism introduced in commit
  9b09fc376e to only accept alternative
  name for function declaration.
- merge the code with the one introduced in commit
  264a103610.
- Don't memorize token for asm label but directly the asm label.
2011-02-09 00:12:57 +01:00
Thomas Preud'homme
c23400278a Fix incorrect use of basic type as bitflags.
Fix incorrect use of basic types as bitflags and inefficiency in commit
cf36410e30
2011-02-07 23:46:20 +01:00
Thomas Preud'homme
cf36410e30 Complain for static fct declared w/o file scope
Error out on static function without file scope and give an explaination
to the user

This is a rewrite of e9406c09a3 but
considering problems raised about static local function pointers in
632ee5a540.
2011-02-06 22:50:05 +01:00
Thomas Preud'homme
db560e9439 Revert "Implement C99 Variable Length Arrays"
This reverts commit a5a50eaafe.
2011-02-05 02:33:46 +01:00
Thomas Preud'homme
4b8470f3ae Revert "Disable C99 VLA when alloca is unavailable."
This reverts commit e3e5d4ad7a.
2011-02-05 02:33:45 +01:00
Thomas Preud'homme
e3e5d4ad7a Disable C99 VLA when alloca is unavailable.
* Disable C99 VLA detection when alloca is unavailable and protect the
  new reference to TOK_alloca in decl_initializer in order to compile
  and run for architecture without working alloca.

  Not all code of C99 VLA is commented as it would required many ifdef
  stanza. Just the detection is commented so that VT_VLA is never set
  any type and the C99 VLA code is compiled but never called. However
  vpush_global_sym(&func_old_type, TOK_alloca) in decl_initializer needs
  to be protected by an ifdef stanza as well because it uses TOK_alloca.

* include alloca and C99 VLA tests according to availability of
  TOK_alloca instead of relying on the current architecture
2011-02-04 15:24:48 +01:00
Thomas Preud'homme
a5a50eaafe Implement C99 Variable Length Arrays
Implement C99 Variable Length Arrays in tinycc:
- Support VLA with multiple level (nested vla)
- Update documentation with regards to VT_VLA
- Add a testsuite in tcctest.c
2011-02-04 02:22:25 +01:00
Joe Soroka
cf08675702 weak definitions overrule non-weak prototypes 2011-02-01 09:41:03 -08:00
Joe Soroka
4d5105c8f1 support weak attribute on variables 2011-02-01 00:37:53 -08:00
Shinichiro Hamaji
0ed7ba3f5e Support struct arguments with stdarg.h
- add __builtin_va_arg_types to check how arguments were passed
- move most code of stdarg into libtcc1.c
- remove __builtin_malloc and __builtin_free
- add a test case based on the bug report
  (http://www.mail-archive.com/tinycc-devel@nongnu.org/msg03036.html)
2010-12-28 19:32:40 +09:00