171 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
171 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
NOTE (2012-11-29):
|
|
|
|
The functionality implemented by this extension has been superseded
|
|
by WAL-mode. This module is no longer supported or maintained. The
|
|
code is retained for historical reference only.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Normally, when SQLite writes to a database file, it waits until the write
|
|
operation is finished before returning control to the calling application.
|
|
Since writing to the file-system is usually very slow compared with CPU
|
|
bound operations, this can be a performance bottleneck. This directory
|
|
contains an extension that causes SQLite to perform all write requests
|
|
using a separate thread running in the background. Although this does not
|
|
reduce the overall system resources (CPU, disk bandwidth etc.) at all, it
|
|
allows SQLite to return control to the caller quickly even when writing to
|
|
the database, eliminating the bottleneck.
|
|
|
|
1. Functionality
|
|
|
|
1.1 How it Works
|
|
1.2 Limitations
|
|
1.3 Locking and Concurrency
|
|
|
|
2. Compilation and Usage
|
|
|
|
3. Porting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. FUNCTIONALITY
|
|
|
|
With asynchronous I/O, write requests are handled by a separate thread
|
|
running in the background. This means that the thread that initiates
|
|
a database write does not have to wait for (sometimes slow) disk I/O
|
|
to occur. The write seems to happen very quickly, though in reality
|
|
it is happening at its usual slow pace in the background.
|
|
|
|
Asynchronous I/O appears to give better responsiveness, but at a price.
|
|
You lose the Durable property. With the default I/O backend of SQLite,
|
|
once a write completes, you know that the information you wrote is
|
|
safely on disk. With the asynchronous I/O, this is not the case. If
|
|
your program crashes or if a power loss occurs after the database
|
|
write but before the asynchronous write thread has completed, then the
|
|
database change might never make it to disk and the next user of the
|
|
database might not see your change.
|
|
|
|
You lose Durability with asynchronous I/O, but you still retain the
|
|
other parts of ACID: Atomic, Consistent, and Isolated. Many
|
|
appliations get along fine without the Durablity.
|
|
|
|
1.1 How it Works
|
|
|
|
Asynchronous I/O works by creating a special SQLite "vfs" structure
|
|
and registering it with sqlite3_vfs_register(). When files opened via
|
|
this vfs are written to (using the vfs xWrite() method), the data is not
|
|
written directly to disk, but is placed in the "write-queue" to be
|
|
handled by the background thread.
|
|
|
|
When files opened with the asynchronous vfs are read from
|
|
(using the vfs xRead() method), the data is read from the file on
|
|
disk and the write-queue, so that from the point of view of
|
|
the vfs reader the xWrite() appears to have already completed.
|
|
|
|
The special vfs is registered (and unregistered) by calls to the
|
|
API functions sqlite3async_initialize() and sqlite3async_shutdown().
|
|
See section "Compilation and Usage" below for details.
|
|
|
|
1.2 Limitations
|
|
|
|
In order to gain experience with the main ideas surrounding asynchronous
|
|
IO, this implementation is deliberately kept simple. Additional
|
|
capabilities may be added in the future.
|
|
|
|
For example, as currently implemented, if writes are happening at a
|
|
steady stream that exceeds the I/O capability of the background writer
|
|
thread, the queue of pending write operations will grow without bound.
|
|
If this goes on for long enough, the host system could run out of memory.
|
|
A more sophisticated module could to keep track of the quantity of
|
|
pending writes and stop accepting new write requests when the queue of
|
|
pending writes grows too large.
|
|
|
|
1.3 Locking and Concurrency
|
|
|
|
Multiple connections from within a single process that use this
|
|
implementation of asynchronous IO may access a single database
|
|
file concurrently. From the point of view of the user, if all
|
|
connections are from within a single process, there is no difference
|
|
between the concurrency offered by "normal" SQLite and SQLite
|
|
using the asynchronous backend.
|
|
|
|
If file-locking is enabled (it is enabled by default), then connections
|
|
from multiple processes may also read and write the database file.
|
|
However concurrency is reduced as follows:
|
|
|
|
* When a connection using asynchronous IO begins a database
|
|
transaction, the database is locked immediately. However the
|
|
lock is not released until after all relevant operations
|
|
in the write-queue have been flushed to disk. This means
|
|
(for example) that the database may remain locked for some
|
|
time after a "COMMIT" or "ROLLBACK" is issued.
|
|
|
|
* If an application using asynchronous IO executes transactions
|
|
in quick succession, other database users may be effectively
|
|
locked out of the database. This is because when a BEGIN
|
|
is executed, a database lock is established immediately. But
|
|
when the corresponding COMMIT or ROLLBACK occurs, the lock
|
|
is not released until the relevant part of the write-queue
|
|
has been flushed through. As a result, if a COMMIT is followed
|
|
by a BEGIN before the write-queue is flushed through, the database
|
|
is never unlocked,preventing other processes from accessing
|
|
the database.
|
|
|
|
File-locking may be disabled at runtime using the sqlite3async_control()
|
|
API (see below). This may improve performance when an NFS or other
|
|
network file-system, as the synchronous round-trips to the server be
|
|
required to establish file locks are avoided. However, if multiple
|
|
connections attempt to access the same database file when file-locking
|
|
is disabled, application crashes and database corruption is a likely
|
|
outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. COMPILATION AND USAGE
|
|
|
|
The asynchronous IO extension consists of a single file of C code
|
|
(sqlite3async.c), and a header file (sqlite3async.h) that defines the
|
|
C API used by applications to activate and control the modules
|
|
functionality.
|
|
|
|
To use the asynchronous IO extension, compile sqlite3async.c as
|
|
part of the application that uses SQLite. Then use the API defined
|
|
in sqlite3async.h to initialize and configure the module.
|
|
|
|
The asynchronous IO VFS API is described in detail in comments in
|
|
sqlite3async.h. Using the API usually consists of the following steps:
|
|
|
|
1. Register the asynchronous IO VFS with SQLite by calling the
|
|
sqlite3async_initialize() function.
|
|
|
|
2. Create a background thread to perform write operations and call
|
|
sqlite3async_run().
|
|
|
|
3. Use the normal SQLite API to read and write to databases via
|
|
the asynchronous IO VFS.
|
|
|
|
Refer to sqlite3async.h for details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. PORTING
|
|
|
|
Currently the asynchronous IO extension is compatible with win32 systems
|
|
and systems that support the pthreads interface, including Mac OSX, Linux,
|
|
and other varieties of Unix.
|
|
|
|
To port the asynchronous IO extension to another platform, the user must
|
|
implement mutex and condition variable primitives for the new platform.
|
|
Currently there is no externally available interface to allow this, but
|
|
modifying the code within sqlite3async.c to include the new platforms
|
|
concurrency primitives is relatively easy. Search within sqlite3async.c
|
|
for the comment string "PORTING FUNCTIONS" for details. Then implement
|
|
new versions of each of the following:
|
|
|
|
static void async_mutex_enter(int eMutex);
|
|
static void async_mutex_leave(int eMutex);
|
|
static void async_cond_wait(int eCond, int eMutex);
|
|
static void async_cond_signal(int eCond);
|
|
static void async_sched_yield(void);
|
|
|
|
The functionality required of each of the above functions is described
|
|
in comments in sqlite3async.c.
|