73aa096f36
FossilOrigin-Name: c734585e1a801bec2d393d000c323ba842c2292d
225 lines
11 KiB
Tcl
225 lines
11 KiB
Tcl
set rcsid {$Id: different.tcl,v 1.8 2006/12/18 14:12:21 drh Exp $}
|
|
source common.tcl
|
|
header {Distinctive Features Of SQLite}
|
|
puts {
|
|
<p>
|
|
This page highlights some of the characteristics of SQLite that are
|
|
unusual and which make SQLite different from many other SQL
|
|
database engines.
|
|
</p>
|
|
}
|
|
proc feature {tag name text} {
|
|
puts "<a name=\"$tag\" />"
|
|
puts "<p><b>$name</b></p>\n"
|
|
puts "<blockquote>$text</blockquote>\n"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature zeroconfig {Zero-Configuration} {
|
|
SQLite does not need to be "installed" before it is used.
|
|
There is no "setup" procedure. There is no
|
|
server process that needs to be started, stopped, or configured.
|
|
There is
|
|
no need for an administrator to create a new database instance or assign
|
|
access permissions to users.
|
|
SQLite uses no configuration files.
|
|
Nothing needs to be done to tell the system that SQLite is running.
|
|
No actions are required to recover after a system crash or power failure.
|
|
There is nothing to troubleshoot.
|
|
<p>
|
|
SQLite just works.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Other more familiar database engines run great once you get them going.
|
|
But doing the initial installation and configuration can be
|
|
intimidatingly complex.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature serverless {Serverless} {
|
|
Most SQL database engines are implemented as a separate server
|
|
process. Programs that want to access the database communicate
|
|
with the server using some kind of interprocess communcation
|
|
(typically TCP/IP) to send requests to the server and to receive
|
|
back results. SQLite does not work this way. With SQLite, the
|
|
process that wants to access the database reads and writes
|
|
directly from the database files on disk. There is no intermediary
|
|
server process.
|
|
<p>
|
|
There are advantages and disadvantages to being serverless. The
|
|
main advantage is that there is no separate server process
|
|
to install, setup, configure, initialize, manage, and troubleshoot.
|
|
This is one reason why SQLite is a "zero-configuration" database
|
|
engine. Programs that use SQLite require no administrative support
|
|
for setting up the database engine before they are run. Any program
|
|
that is able to access the disk is able to use an SQLite database.
|
|
<p>
|
|
On the other hand, a database engine that uses a server can provide
|
|
better protection from bugs in the client application - stray pointers
|
|
in a client cannot corrupt memory on the server. And because a server
|
|
is a single persistent process, it is able control database access with
|
|
more precision, allowing for finer grain locking and better concurrancy.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Most SQL database engines are client/server based. Of those that are
|
|
serverless, SQLite is the only one that this author knows of that
|
|
allows multiple applications to access the same database at the same time.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature onefile {Single Database File} {
|
|
An SQLite database is a single ordinary disk file that can be located
|
|
anywhere in the directory hierarchy. If SQLite can read
|
|
the disk file then it can read anything in the database. If the disk
|
|
file and its directory are writable, then SQLite can change anything
|
|
in the database. Database files can easily be copied onto a USB
|
|
memory stick or emailed for sharing.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Other SQL database engines tend to store data as a large collection of
|
|
files. Often these files are in a standard location that only the
|
|
database engine itself can access. This makes the data more secure,
|
|
but also makes it harder to access. Some SQL database engines provide
|
|
the option of writing directly to disk and bypassing the filesystem
|
|
all together. This provides added performance, but at the cost of
|
|
considerable setup and maintenance complexity.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature small {Compact} {
|
|
When optimized for size, the whole SQLite library with everything enabled
|
|
is less than 225KiB in size (as measured on an ix86 using the "size"
|
|
utility from the GNU compiler suite.) Unneeded features can be disabled
|
|
at compile-time to further reduce the size of the library to under
|
|
170KiB if desired.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Most other SQL database engines are much larger than this. IBM boasts
|
|
that it's recently released CloudScape database engine is "only" a 2MiB
|
|
jar file - 10 times larger than SQLite even after it is compressed!
|
|
Firebird boasts that it's client-side library is only 350KiB. That's
|
|
50% larger than SQLite and does not even contain the database engine.
|
|
The Berkeley DB library from Sleepycat is 450KiB and it omits SQL
|
|
support, providing the programmer with only simple key/value pairs.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature typing {Manifest typing} {
|
|
Most SQL database engines use static typing. A datatype is associated
|
|
with each column in a table and only values of that particular datatype
|
|
are allowed to be stored in that column. SQLite relaxes this restriction
|
|
by using manifest typing.
|
|
In manifest typing, the datatype is a property of the value itself, not
|
|
of the column in which the value is stored.
|
|
SQLite thus allows the user to store
|
|
any value of any datatype into any column regardless of the declared type
|
|
of that column. (There are some exceptions to this rule: An INTEGER
|
|
PRIMARY KEY column may only store integers. And SQLite attempts to coerce
|
|
values into the declared datatype of the column when it can.)
|
|
<p>
|
|
As far as we can tell, the SQL language specification allows the use
|
|
of manifest typing. Nevertheless, most other SQL database engines are
|
|
statically typed and so some people
|
|
feel that the use of manifest typing is a bug in SQLite. But the authors
|
|
of SQLite feel very strongly that this is a feature. The use of manifest
|
|
typing in SQLite is a deliberate design decision which has proven in practice
|
|
to make SQLite more reliable and easier to use, especially when used in
|
|
combination with dynamically typed programming languages such as Tcl and
|
|
Python.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature flex {Variable-length records} {
|
|
Most other SQL database engines allocated a fixed amount of disk space
|
|
for each row in most tables. They play special tricks for handling
|
|
BLOBs and CLOBs which can be of wildly varying length. But for most
|
|
tables, if you declare a column to be a VARCHAR(100) then the database
|
|
engine will allocate
|
|
100 bytes of disk space regardless of how much information you actually
|
|
store in that column.
|
|
<p>
|
|
SQLite, in contrast, use only the amount of disk space actually
|
|
needed to store the information in a row. If you store a single
|
|
character in a VARCHAR(100) column, then only a single byte of disk
|
|
space is consumed. (Actually two bytes - there is some overhead at
|
|
the beginning of each column to record its datatype and length.)
|
|
<p>
|
|
The use of variable-length records by SQLite has a number of advantages.
|
|
It results in smaller database files, obviously. It also makes the
|
|
database run faster, since there is less information to move to and from
|
|
disk. And, the use of variable-length records makes it possible for
|
|
SQLite to employ manifest typing instead of static typing.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature readable {Readable source code} {
|
|
The source code to SQLite is designed to be readable and accessible to
|
|
the average programmer. All procedures and data structures and many
|
|
automatic variables are carefully commented with useful information about
|
|
what they do. Boilerplate commenting is omitted.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature vdbe {SQL statements compile into virtual machine code} {
|
|
Every SQL database engine compiles each SQL statement into some kind of
|
|
internal data structure which is then used to carry out the work of the
|
|
statement. But in most SQL engines that internal data structure is a
|
|
complex web of interlinked structures and objects. In SQLite, the compiled
|
|
form of statements is a short program in a machine-language like
|
|
representation. Users of the database can view this
|
|
<a href="opcode.html">virtual machine language</a>
|
|
by prepending the <a href="lang_explain.html">EXPLAIN</a> keyword
|
|
to a query.
|
|
<p>
|
|
The use of a virtual machine in SQLite has been a great benefit to
|
|
library's development. The virtual machine provides a crisp, well-defined
|
|
junction between the front-end of SQLite (the part that parses SQL
|
|
statements and generates virtual machine code) and the back-end (the
|
|
part that executes the virtual machine code and computes a result.)
|
|
The virtual machine allows the developers to see clearly and in an
|
|
easily readable form what SQLite is trying to do with each statement
|
|
it compiles, which is a tremendous help in debugging.
|
|
Depending on how it is compiled, SQLite also has the capability of
|
|
tracing the execution of the virtual machine - printing each
|
|
virtual machine instruction and its result as it executes.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#feature binding {Tight bindings to dynamic languages} {
|
|
# Because it is embedded, SQLite can have a much tighter and more natural
|
|
# binding to high-level dynamic languages such as Tcl, Perl, Python,
|
|
# PHP, and Ruby.
|
|
# For example,
|
|
#}
|
|
|
|
feature license {Public domain} {
|
|
The source code for SQLite is in the public domain. No claim of copyright
|
|
is made on any part of the core source code. (The documentation and test
|
|
code is a different matter - some sections of documentation and test logic
|
|
are governed by open-sources licenses.) All contributors to the
|
|
SQLite core software have signed affidavits specifically disavowing any
|
|
copyright interest in the code. This means that anybody is able to legally
|
|
do anything they want with the SQLite source code.
|
|
<p>
|
|
There are other SQL database engines with liberal licenses that allow
|
|
the code to be broadly and freely used. But those other engines are
|
|
still governed by copyright law. SQLite is different in that copyright
|
|
law simply does not apply.
|
|
<p>
|
|
The source code files for other SQL database engines typically begin
|
|
with a comment describing your license rights to view and copy that file.
|
|
The SQLite source code contains no license since it is not governed by
|
|
copyright. Instead of a license, the SQLite source code offers a blessing:
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
<i>May you do good and not evil<br>
|
|
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others<br>
|
|
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.</i>
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
feature extensions {SQL language extensions} {
|
|
SQLite provides a number of enhancements to the SQL language
|
|
not normally found in other database engines.
|
|
The EXPLAIN keyword and manifest typing have already been mentioned
|
|
above. SQLite also provides statements such as
|
|
<a href="lang_replace.html">REPLACE</a> and the
|
|
<a href="lang_conflict.html">ON CONFLICT</a> clause that allow for
|
|
added control over the resolution of constraint conflicts.
|
|
SQLite supports <a href="lang_attach.html">ATTACH</a> and
|
|
<a href="lang_detach.html">DETACH</a> commands that allow multiple
|
|
independent databases to be used together in the same query.
|
|
And SQLite defines APIs that allows the user to add new
|
|
<a href="capi3ref.html#sqlite3_create_function">SQL functions</a>
|
|
and <a href="capi3ref.html#sqlite3_create_collation">collating sequences</a>.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
footer $rcsid
|