Update comments on the unix file locking protocol. No changes to code.
FossilOrigin-Name: 716b20de4306de1653ba5bcdbfb8d210d2d46e1a
This commit is contained in:
parent
40dc357a01
commit
f878e6e1a7
12
manifest
12
manifest
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
C Remove\san\sunnecessary\sbranch\sin\sthe\ssqlite3LogEstToInt()\sroutine.
|
||||
D 2016-04-05T23:39:53.536
|
||||
C Update\scomments\son\sthe\sunix\sfile\slocking\sprotocol.\s\sNo\schanges\sto\scode.
|
||||
D 2016-04-07T13:45:20.032
|
||||
F Makefile.in eba680121821b8a60940a81454316f47a341487a
|
||||
F Makefile.linux-gcc 7bc79876b875010e8c8f9502eb935ca92aa3c434
|
||||
F Makefile.msc 1f123a0757f6f04f0341accb46457e116817159a
|
||||
@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ F src/os.c ca10edb445ad2c5fdc7285b49d72bcdf261fa23e
|
||||
F src/os.h 91ff889115ecd01f436d3611f7f5ea4dc12d92f1
|
||||
F src/os_common.h b2f4707a603e36811d9b1a13278bffd757857b85
|
||||
F src/os_setup.h c9d4553b5aaa6f73391448b265b89bed0b890faa
|
||||
F src/os_unix.c b1ccb273771f41dbdbe0ba7c1ad63c38ad5972ec
|
||||
F src/os_unix.c bde4844f0849cab5924c6a81178f8500774ce76b
|
||||
F src/os_win.c b3ba9573d8d893e70a6a8015bbee572ecf7ffbef
|
||||
F src/os_win.h eb7a47aa17b26b77eb97e4823f20a00b8bda12ca
|
||||
F src/pager.c 38718a019ca762ba4f6795425d5a54db70d1790d
|
||||
@ -1482,7 +1482,7 @@ F vsixtest/vsixtest.tcl 6a9a6ab600c25a91a7acc6293828957a386a8a93
|
||||
F vsixtest/vsixtest.vcxproj.data 2ed517e100c66dc455b492e1a33350c1b20fbcdc
|
||||
F vsixtest/vsixtest.vcxproj.filters 37e51ffedcdb064aad6ff33b6148725226cd608e
|
||||
F vsixtest/vsixtest_TemporaryKey.pfx e5b1b036facdb453873e7084e1cae9102ccc67a0
|
||||
P fb555c3c2af7f5e62ff839658f4fba7b645d3a68
|
||||
R 7154c3cc804ee2fc9b7c1578477c3cf7
|
||||
P da81d7afeb0566a09a505ba5fce901e991e4a029
|
||||
R c31dba9b364f6a5e65569f6b94115698
|
||||
U drh
|
||||
Z c58518044f9cf200f41dd76757fdb4e4
|
||||
Z 3e3e5fb3cba3f9bdb43d997a64c47647
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
da81d7afeb0566a09a505ba5fce901e991e4a029
|
||||
716b20de4306de1653ba5bcdbfb8d210d2d46e1a
|
@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ static int unixLock(sqlite3_file *id, int eFileLock){
|
||||
** lock transitions in terms of the POSIX advisory shared and exclusive
|
||||
** lock primitives (called read-locks and write-locks below, to avoid
|
||||
** confusion with SQLite lock names). The algorithms are complicated
|
||||
** slightly in order to be compatible with windows systems simultaneously
|
||||
** slightly in order to be compatible with Windows95 systems simultaneously
|
||||
** accessing the same database file, in case that is ever required.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** Symbols defined in os.h indentify the 'pending byte' and the 'reserved
|
||||
@ -1510,8 +1510,14 @@ static int unixLock(sqlite3_file *id, int eFileLock){
|
||||
** range', a range of 510 bytes at a well known offset.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** To obtain a SHARED lock, a read-lock is obtained on the 'pending
|
||||
** byte'. If this is successful, a random byte from the 'shared byte
|
||||
** range' is read-locked and the lock on the 'pending byte' released.
|
||||
** byte'. If this is successful, 'shared byte range' is read-locked
|
||||
** and the lock on the 'pending byte' released. (Legacy note: When
|
||||
** SQLite was first developed, Windows95 systems were still very common,
|
||||
** and Widnows95 lacks a shared-lock capability. So on Windows95, a
|
||||
** single randomly selected by from the 'shared byte range' is locked.
|
||||
** Windows95 is now pretty much extinct, but this work-around for the
|
||||
** lack of shared-locks on Windows95 lives on, for backwards
|
||||
** compatibility.)
|
||||
**
|
||||
** A process may only obtain a RESERVED lock after it has a SHARED lock.
|
||||
** A RESERVED lock is implemented by grabbing a write-lock on the
|
||||
@ -1530,11 +1536,6 @@ static int unixLock(sqlite3_file *id, int eFileLock){
|
||||
** range'. Since all other locks require a read-lock on one of the bytes
|
||||
** within this range, this ensures that no other locks are held on the
|
||||
** database.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** The reason a single byte cannot be used instead of the 'shared byte
|
||||
** range' is that some versions of windows do not support read-locks. By
|
||||
** locking a random byte from a range, concurrent SHARED locks may exist
|
||||
** even if the locking primitive used is always a write-lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int rc = SQLITE_OK;
|
||||
unixFile *pFile = (unixFile*)id;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user