Add extra tests for the optimization on this branch.

FossilOrigin-Name: 4921cd9520080f9baff70e548f64a56e2204b398b8397a2d318a98c32ec4b00c
This commit is contained in:
dan 2017-05-01 14:09:32 +00:00
parent ab31a8450b
commit 181a1167dc
3 changed files with 82 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
C Automatically\stransfer\sterms\sfrom\sthe\sHAVING\sclause\sto\sthe\sWHERE\sclause\sof\san\naggregate\squery\sin\scases\swhere\sthe\sresult\sof\sevaluating\sthe\sterm\sdepends\sonly\none\sone\sor\smore\sof\sthe\sGROUP\sBY\sexpressions\s(and\son\sno\sother\sinputs).
D 2017-04-29T20:53:09.360
C Add\sextra\stests\sfor\sthe\soptimization\son\sthis\sbranch.
D 2017-05-01T14:09:32.423
F Makefile.in 1cc758ce3374a32425e4d130c2fe7b026b20de5b8843243de75f087c0a2661fb
F Makefile.linux-gcc 7bc79876b875010e8c8f9502eb935ca92aa3c434
F Makefile.msc 6a8c838220f7c00820e1fc0ac1bccaaa8e5676067e1dbfa1bafa7a4ffecf8ae6
@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ F test/fuzzer2.test a85ef814ce071293bce1ad8dffa217cbbaad4c14
F test/fuzzerfault.test 8792cd77fd5bce765b05d0c8e01b9edcf8af8536
F test/gcfault.test dd28c228a38976d6336a3fc42d7e5f1ad060cb8c
F test/genesis.tcl 1e2e2e8e5cc4058549a154ff1892fe5c9de19f98
F test/having.test a03676a754815628a08d3b96d506dd9eda8ffbdd356cd8ea9c2e5368286fbe6a
F test/having.test 30a02b8a9a47cba7bdb5281999c5cbff407c2ac296511ee64dd0b418fe38eb0f
F test/hexlit.test 4a6a5f46e3c65c4bf1fa06f5dd5a9507a5627751
F test/hidden.test 23c1393a79e846d68fd902d72c85d5e5dcf98711
F test/hook.test dbc0b87756e1e20e7497b56889c9e9cd2f8cc2b5
@ -1578,10 +1578,7 @@ F vsixtest/vsixtest.tcl 6a9a6ab600c25a91a7acc6293828957a386a8a93
F vsixtest/vsixtest.vcxproj.data 2ed517e100c66dc455b492e1a33350c1b20fbcdc
F vsixtest/vsixtest.vcxproj.filters 37e51ffedcdb064aad6ff33b6148725226cd608e
F vsixtest/vsixtest_TemporaryKey.pfx e5b1b036facdb453873e7084e1cae9102ccc67a0
P d7bb79ed3a40419d143fbe35c310e51fe7b384a22f082a61ad788671d2d33ee0
R bd50b7d1e9edcc2d5d20fca02c02c5c7
T *branch * having-where-optimization
T *sym-having-where-optimization *
T -sym-trunk *
P 5375a3ce56f1d993b13b469fe33ec7679948f53940f62a15ddbaeb8aaa26a22c
R 123e296789286f2ee6ee6640a2471eff
U dan
Z 94cbfc69ef14a78710cd01b746487e79
Z 8431f2088d761010cb187c22f8f8d978

View File

@ -1 +1 @@
5375a3ce56f1d993b13b469fe33ec7679948f53940f62a15ddbaeb8aaa26a22c
4921cd9520080f9baff70e548f64a56e2204b398b8397a2d318a98c32ec4b00c

View File

@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ source $testdir/tester.tcl
set testprefix having
do_execsql_test 1.0 {
CREATE TABLE t2(c, d);
CREATE TABLE t1(a, b);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 1);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 2);
@ -34,11 +36,14 @@ foreach {tn sql res} {
do_execsql_test 1.$tn $sql $res
}
# Run an EXPLAIN command for both SQL statements. Return true if
# the outputs are identical, or false otherwise.
#
proc compare_vdbe {sql1 sql2} {
set r1 [list]
set r2 [list]
db eval "explain $sql1" { lappend r1 $opcode $p1 $p2 $p3}
db eval "explain $sql2" { lappend r2 $opcode $p1 $p2 $p3}
db eval "explain $sql1" { lappend r1 $opcode $p1 $p2 $p3 $p4 $p5}
db eval "explain $sql2" { lappend r2 $opcode $p1 $p2 $p3 $p4 $p5}
return [expr {$r1==$r2}]
}
@ -46,17 +51,10 @@ proc do_compare_vdbe_test {tn sql1 sql2 res} {
uplevel [list do_test $tn [list compare_vdbe $sql1 $sql2] $res]
}
do_compare_vdbe_test 2.1 {
SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING a=2
} {
SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE a=2 GROUP BY a
} 1
do_compare_vdbe_test 2.2 {
SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a+1 HAVING a=2
} {
SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a+1 HAVING a=2
} 1
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Test that various statements that are eligible for the optimization
# produce the same VDBE code as optimizing by hand does.
#
foreach {tn sql1 sql2} {
1 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING a=2"
"SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE a=2 GROUP BY a"
@ -79,16 +77,78 @@ foreach {tn sql1 sql2} {
GROUP BY a
)
}
5 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a COLLATE binary HAVING 0"
"SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE 0 GROUP BY a COLLATE binary"
6 "SELECT count(*) FROM t1,t2 WHERE a=c GROUP BY b, d HAVING b=d"
"SELECT count(*) FROM t1,t2 WHERE a=c AND b=d GROUP BY b, d"
7 {
SELECT count(*) FROM t1,t2 WHERE a=c GROUP BY b, d
HAVING b=d COLLATE nocase
} {
SELECT count(*) FROM t1,t2 WHERE a=c AND b=d COLLATE nocase
GROUP BY b, d
}
8 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a||b HAVING substr(a||b, 1, 1)='a'"
"SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE substr(a||b, 1, 1)='a' GROUP BY a||b"
} {
do_compare_vdbe_test 3.$tn $sql1 $sql2 1
do_compare_vdbe_test 2.$tn $sql1 $sql2 1
}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 1: Test that the optimization is only applied if the GROUP BY term
# uses BINARY collation.
#
# 2: Not applied if there is a non-deterministic function in the HAVING
# term.
#
foreach {tn sql1 sql2} {
1 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a COLLATE nocase HAVING a=2"
"SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE a=2 GROUP BY a COLLATE nocase"
2 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING randomblob(a)<X'88'"
"SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE randomblob(a)<X'88' GROUP BY a"
} {
do_compare_vdbe_test 4.$tn $sql1 $sql2 0
do_compare_vdbe_test 3.$tn $sql1 $sql2 0
}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Test that non-deterministic functions disqualify a term from being
# moved from the HAVING to WHERE clause.
#
do_execsql_test 4.1 {
CREATE TABLE t3(a, b);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 1);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 2);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 3);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2, 1);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2, 2);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2, 3);
}
proc nondeter {args} {
incr ::nondeter_ret
expr {$::nondeter_ret % 2}
}
db func nondeter nondeter
set ::nondeter_ret 0
do_execsql_test 4.2 {
SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t3 GROUP BY a HAVING nondeter(a)
} {1 6}
# If the term where moved, the query above would return the same
# result as the following. But it does not.
#
set ::nondeter_ret 0
do_execsql_test 4.3 {
SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t3 WHERE nondeter(a) GROUP BY a
} {1 4 2 2}
finish_test