048c5fd1bf
As mentioned in commit 0c1bd46, we ignored requests to discard the trailing cluster of an unaligned image. While discard is an advisory operation from the guest standpoint, (and we are therefore free to ignore any request), our qcow2 implementation exploits the fact that a discarded cluster reads back as 0. As long as we discard on cluster boundaries, we are fine; but that means we could observe non-zero data leaked at the tail of an unaligned image. Enhance iotest 66 to cover this case, and fix the implementation to honor a discard request on the final partial cluster. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170407013709.18440-1-eblake@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>