Currently we update s->use_copy_range and s->copy_size in
block_copy_do_copy().
It's not very good:
1. block_copy_do_copy() is intended to be a simple function, that wraps
bdrv_co_<io> functions for need of block copy. That's why we don't pass
BlockCopyTask into it. So, block_copy_do_copy() is bad place for
manipulation with generic state of block-copy process
2. We are going to make block-copy thread-safe. So, it's good to move
manipulation with state of block-copy to the places where we'll need
critical sections anyway, to not introduce extra synchronization
primitives in block_copy_do_copy().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210528141628.44287-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bed9523471