We now implement a bunch of new facilities we can properly indicate.
ESOP-1/ESOP-2 handling is discussed in the PoP Chafter 3-15
("Suppression on Protection"). The "Basic suppression-on-protection (SOP)
facility" is a core part of z/Architecture without a facility
indication. ESOP-2 is indicated by ESOP-1 + Side-effect facility
("ESOP-2"). Besides ESOP-2, the side-effect facility is only relevant for
the guarded-storage facility (we don't implement).
S390_ESOP:
- We indicate DAT exeptions by setting bit 61 of the TEID (TEC) to 1 and
bit 60 to zero. We don't trigger ALCP exceptions yet. Also, we set
bit 0-51 and bit 62/63 to the right values.
S390_ACCESS_EXCEPTION_FS_INDICATION:
- The TEID (TEC) properly indicates in bit 52/53 on any access if it was
a fetch or a store
S390_SIDE_EFFECT_ACCESS_ESOP2:
- We have no side-effect accesses (esp., we don't implement the
guarded-storage faciliy), we correctly set bit 64 of the TEID (TEC) to
0 (no side-effect).
- ESOP2: We properly set bit 56, 60, 61 in the TEID (TEC) to indicate the
type of protection. We don't trigger KCP/ALCP exceptions yet.
S390_INSTRUCTION_EXEC_PROT:
- The MMU properly detects and indicates the exception on instruction fetches
- Protected TLB entries will never get PAGE_EXEC set.
There is no need to fake the abscence of any of the facilities - without
the facilities, some bits of the TEID (TEC) are simply unpredictable.
As IEP was added with z14 and we currently implement a z13, add it to
the MAX model instead.
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
b580b6ee05