1cd93fb0bf
Those functions are not needed, one remove function should already work. Clean it up. Here the code doesn't really care about whether we need to keep that dupfd around if close() failed: when that happens something got very wrong, keeping the dup_fd around the fdsets may not help that situation so far. Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dave@treblig.org> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> [add missing return statement, removal during traversal is not safe] Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
19 lines
304 B
C
19 lines
304 B
C
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
|
|
#include "qapi/error.h"
|
|
#include "monitor/monitor.h"
|
|
#include "../monitor/monitor-internal.h"
|
|
|
|
int monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add(int64_t fdset_id, int flags)
|
|
{
|
|
errno = ENOSYS;
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void monitor_fdset_dup_fd_remove(int dupfd)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void monitor_fdsets_cleanup(void)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|