ca1145ee88
Add a test of the rST output from the QAPI doc-comment generator, similar to what we currently have that tests the Texinfo output. This is a bit more awkward with Sphinx, because the generated output is not 100% under our control the way the QAPI-to-Texinfo generator was. We can't observe the data we generate, only the Sphinx output. Two issues. One, the output can vary with the Sphinx version. In practice Sphinx's plaintext output generation has been identical between at least Sphinx 1.6 and 3.0, so we use that. (The HTML output has had changes across versions). We use an exact-match comparison check, with the understanding that perhaps changes in a future Sphinx version might require us to implement something more clever to cope with variation in the output. Two, the test can only protect us from changes in the data we generate that are visible in plain text. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Commit message improved] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
6 lines
189 B
ReStructuredText
6 lines
189 B
ReStructuredText
..
|
|
Test Sphinx manual that pulls in the test schema file. We will generate
|
|
a plain-text output file and compare it against a reference.
|
|
|
|
.. qapi-doc:: tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
|