qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/183.out
Stefan Hajnoczi effd60c878 monitor: only run coroutine commands in qemu_aio_context
monitor_qmp_dispatcher_co() runs in the iohandler AioContext that is not
polled during nested event loops. The coroutine currently reschedules
itself in the main loop's qemu_aio_context AioContext, which is polled
during nested event loops. One known problem is that QMP device-add
calls drain_call_rcu(), which temporarily drops the BQL, leading to all
sorts of havoc like other vCPU threads re-entering device emulation code
while another vCPU thread is waiting in device emulation code with
aio_poll().

Paolo Bonzini suggested running non-coroutine QMP handlers in the
iohandler AioContext. This avoids trouble with nested event loops. His
original idea was to move coroutine rescheduling to
monitor_qmp_dispatch(), but I resorted to moving it to qmp_dispatch()
because we don't know if the QMP handler needs to run in coroutine
context in monitor_qmp_dispatch(). monitor_qmp_dispatch() would have
been nicer since it's associated with the monitor implementation and not
as general as qmp_dispatch(), which is also used by qemu-ga.

A number of qemu-iotests need updated .out files because the order of
QMP events vs QMP responses has changed.

Solves Issue #1933.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 7bed89958b ("device_core: use drain_call_rcu in in qmp_device_add")
Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215192
Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214985
Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-17369
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240118144823.1497953-4-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2024-01-26 11:16:58 +01:00

67 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext

QA output created by 183
Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT.dest', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
=== Starting VMs ===
{ 'execute': 'qmp_capabilities' }
{"return": {}}
{ 'execute': 'qmp_capabilities' }
{"return": {}}
=== Write something on the source ===
{ 'execute': 'human-monitor-command',
'arguments': { 'command-line':
'qemu-io disk "write -P 0x55 0 64k"' } }
wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
{"return": ""}
{ 'execute': 'human-monitor-command',
'arguments': { 'command-line':
'qemu-io disk "read -P 0x55 0 64k"' } }
read 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
{"return": ""}
=== Do block migration to destination ===
{ 'execute': 'migrate',
'arguments': { 'uri': 'unix:SOCK_DIR/migrate', 'blk': true } }
{"return": {}}
{ 'execute': 'query-status' }
{"return": {"status": "postmigrate", "running": false}}
=== Do some I/O on the destination ===
{ 'execute': 'query-status' }
{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "RESUME"}
{"return": {"status": "running", "running": true}}
{ 'execute': 'human-monitor-command',
'arguments': { 'command-line':
'qemu-io disk "read -P 0x55 0 64k"' } }
read 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
{"return": ""}
{ 'execute': 'human-monitor-command',
'arguments': { 'command-line':
'qemu-io disk "write -P 0x66 1M 64k"' } }
wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 1048576
64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
{"return": ""}
=== Shut down and check image ===
{"execute":"quit"}
{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "SHUTDOWN", "data": {"guest": false, "reason": "host-qmp-quit"}}
{"return": {}}
{"execute":"quit"}
{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "SHUTDOWN", "data": {"guest": false, "reason": "host-qmp-quit"}}
{"return": {}}
No errors were found on the image.
No errors were found on the image.
wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 1048576
64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
Images are identical.
*** done